Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Additional Cooling, Running a 3"- 4" Hose directly onto the fan
GBallantine
post Feb 8 2007, 11:13 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 12-October 04
From: Toronto,Ont.Canada
Member No.: 2,930



Any race guys ever run a 3 or 4 inch hose mounted off the front air dam or attached near the outside mirror thru the rear fire wall and directed onto the fan? Does it add any cooling effect? Any pics of setups?

GB
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
groot
post Feb 8 2007, 11:45 AM
Post #2


Dis member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 894
Joined: 17-December 03
From: Michigan
Member No.: 1,444



I have... one of my many attempts to cool my engine enough.

I ran 2-3" hoses from my turn signal openings. Each of them went to my fan inlet. It helped, but wasn't enough. I moved to a 6" duct early last year.

It all depends on what you're doing with the car. There's a old thread here somewhere.... let me look for it.


Here it is....
3" Ducts
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Demick
post Feb 8 2007, 04:50 PM
Post #3


Ernie made me do it!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,312
Joined: 6-February 03
From: Pleasanton, CA
Member No.: 257



Some quick calculations:
Fan is rated for 1700cfm if I recall correctly. Maybe you want to shoot for 1/2 of this number as it won't be realistic or necessary to supply the entire volume of air at max fan rating.

So you want to supply ~900cfm. This means that the air would have to travel at over 200mph through a 3" duct to supply this kind of air. Not going to even get remotely close to that.

4" duct would be about 120mph of air. No dice.

But use a 6" duct, and that number drops to about 55mph. Seems fairly realistic. Might get this kind of volume if the car travels at ~80mph (depending on lots of factors).

So you can see that it makes sense that a number of racers use a 6" dia 'sewer pipe' to supply the engine cooling air to the fan. Get too much smaller than that and it won't be real effective.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Feb 8 2007, 05:12 PM
Post #4


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,620
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



AJRS once told me that he finally solved heating problems that he had been chasing for years..

when he installed a roughly 6-8inch square duct. His came from a naca duct on the roof and then a clear lexa/plastic square duct through the cockpit and through the lexan rear window.. where it dumped onto a flat central electric style fan.

(Think about the the roof ducting done on the porsche GT1, ralley cars, mcclaren, and other exotics)

he runs all of his hot 4's without the metal front cooling shroud and without the front blower wheel, or front alternator.

His installation of adequate cooling opened up all kinds of HP and longevity options for his -4's

brant
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Randal
post Feb 8 2007, 06:27 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,446
Joined: 29-May 03
From: Los Altos, CA
Member No.: 750



QUOTE(Demick @ Feb 8 2007, 02:50 PM) *

Some quick calculations:
Fan is rated for 1700cfm if I recall correctly. Maybe you want to shoot for 1/2 of this number as it won't be realistic or necessary to supply the entire volume of air at max fan rating.

So you want to supply ~900cfm. This means that the air would have to travel at over 200mph through a 3" duct to supply this kind of air. Not going to even get remotely close to that.

4" duct would be about 120mph of air. No dice.

But use a 6" duct, and that number drops to about 55mph. Seems fairly realistic. Might get this kind of volume if the car travels at ~80mph (depending on lots of factors).

So you can see that it makes sense that a number of racers use a 6" dia 'sewer pipe' to supply the engine cooling air to the fan. Get too much smaller than that and it won't be real effective.



So Demick, for a race car situation, why not just bolt on one of these powerful electric fans and get rid of the mechanical fan altogether?

http://store.summitracing.com/egnsearch.as...k=KeywordSearch
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Demick
post Feb 8 2007, 08:00 PM
Post #6


Ernie made me do it!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,312
Joined: 6-February 03
From: Pleasanton, CA
Member No.: 257



You could, but those axial type fans do not move enough air. Sure, it says 2800cfm or whatever, but that is under no load (free air). They don't move nearly as much when you put resistance in it's way. For airflow against a large resistance, you can't do better than an impeller (which is what the original fan is).

Besides, what is being accomplished with the 'sewer pipe' is getting fresh, cool air to the motor. Volume isn't so much of an issue as getting cooler air. In a stock configuration, the air entering the fan is preheated by 20 to 30 degrees (F) if I recall correctly.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Randal
post Feb 8 2007, 09:15 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,446
Joined: 29-May 03
From: Los Altos, CA
Member No.: 750



QUOTE(Demick @ Feb 8 2007, 06:00 PM) *

You could, but those axial type fans do not move enough air. Sure, it says 2800cfm or whatever, but that is under no load (free air). They don't move nearly as much when you put resistance in it's way. For airflow against a large resistance, you can't do better than an impeller (which is what the original fan is).

Besides, what is being accomplished with the 'sewer pipe' is getting fresh, cool air to the motor. Volume isn't so much of an issue as getting cooler air. In a stock configuration, the air entering the fan is preheated by 20 to 30 degrees (F) if I recall correctly.




OK.. and the impeller fan probably moves a lot more air depending upon the RPM, right? So it is 1700 cfm at ?RPM, but much more at say 5-6K
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john rogers
post Feb 8 2007, 09:30 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,525
Joined: 4-March 03
From: Chula Vista CA
Member No.: 391



As Kevin noted the 3 inch ducts are way too small, with 2 of them only providing 14.13 square inches of cross section area for the air to move down. A SINGLE 6 inch duct provides 28.26 square inches of area so there is way less resistance to the flow into the engine. My racing mentor who used to race 914s back in the early 70's showed me picts of the large single 6 inch duct running right through the firewall into the front of the engine. It was the smooth heating duct type of metal tube. The front mounted fan had only FOUR blades so as long as the car was going fast it was cool. Yellow flag laps were very bad and could actually cook the engine, but then again it only had to last a single race weekend! I think the past post showed the ducts on Frank Beck's car and also the old Wayne Baker #22 IMSA car if I remember right?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Demick
post Feb 8 2007, 09:44 PM
Post #9


Ernie made me do it!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,312
Joined: 6-February 03
From: Pleasanton, CA
Member No.: 257



QUOTE(Randal @ Feb 8 2007, 07:15 PM) *

OK.. and the impeller fan probably moves a lot more air depending upon the RPM, right? So it is 1700 cfm at ?RPM, but much more at say 5-6K



From the factory manual: fan delivery volume ~800L/sec @ 4600rpm. This corresponds to about 1700 CFM.

That is probably the peak performance, as I have heard that the fan cavitates at higher RPM's and therefore delivers less air. So a race motor that regularly spins above 5K RPM really wants some fan modifications to make it perform better at those RPM ranges.

Demick
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
grantsfo
post Feb 9 2007, 01:36 AM
Post #10


Arrrrhhhh!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 16-March 03
Member No.: 433
Region Association: None



Pull the fan off and mount one of these pointed into the cooling ducts. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Good for 800 CFM

http://www.electricsupercharger.com/
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gregrobbins
post Feb 9 2007, 10:12 PM
Post #11


Member: Team NARP
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,515
Joined: 23-March 04
From: Arizona
Member No.: 1,844
Region Association: Southwest Region



The pictures John referrs to at in my Blog.

http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?aut...blogid=230&

QUOTE(john rogers @ Feb 8 2007, 08:30 PM) *

As Kevin noted the 3 inch ducts are way too small, with 2 of them only providing 14.13 square inches of cross section area for the air to move down. A SINGLE 6 inch duct provides 28.26 square inches of area so there is way less resistance to the flow into the engine. My racing mentor who used to race 914s back in the early 70's showed me picts of the large single 6 inch duct running right through the firewall into the front of the engine. It was the smooth heating duct type of metal tube. The front mounted fan had only FOUR blades so as long as the car was going fast it was cool. Yellow flag laps were very bad and could actually cook the engine, but then again it only had to last a single race weekend! I think the past post showed the ducts on Frank Beck's car and also the old Wayne Baker #22 IMSA car if I remember right?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Feb 10 2007, 06:17 PM
Post #12


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Gord, look at my post in the garage forum that shows pics of Kevin Groot's RAT modified cooling fan..

When the fan is spun over 5K RPM constantly it's effectiveness is drastically reduced, no matter how you shove air into it..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
race914
post Feb 11 2007, 03:44 PM
Post #13


73 914-4
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,006
Joined: 31-October 05
From: Nipomo, California (Central Coast)
Member No.: 5,027
Region Association: Central California



Here is a partial view of Frank Beck's setup

Attached Image

Here is another solution that John Rogers posted in another thread

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Feb 18 2007, 06:00 PM
Post #14


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,138
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(Randal @ Feb 8 2007, 04:27 PM) *

So Demick, for a race car situation, why not just bolt on one of these powerful electric fans and get rid of the mechanical fan altogether?
http://store.summitracing.com/egnsearch.as...k=KeywordSearch

Simply put, the mechanical fan takes less crank horsepower. If you figure 80% conversion factors, then the alternator & electric fan arrangement is only 64% as effective as a mechanical fan on the end of the crankshaft.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john rogers
post Feb 18 2007, 09:33 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,525
Joined: 4-March 03
From: Chula Vista CA
Member No.: 391



Probably the most efficient method, with all of the %'s aside is to use fans such as in pict #2 above which is the #22 Wayne Baker car and then use an alternator, specially wound, so it will freewheel until over 4K RPM and then put out the 12 volts needed. There is no fan on the engine and the air ducts blow directly on the cylinders and heads. This setup is terrible for auto-x but GREAT for road racing. When Ron Mistak would bring #22 to the stadium in San Diego, his crew would always have a jumper batt on a cart handy since it would nearly always need jump starts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gregrobbins
post Feb 25 2007, 02:00 AM
Post #16


Member: Team NARP
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,515
Joined: 23-March 04
From: Arizona
Member No.: 1,844
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE(john rogers @ Feb 18 2007, 08:33 PM) *

Probably the most efficient method, with all of the %'s aside is to use fans such as in pict #2 above which is the #22 Wayne Baker car and then use an alternator, specially wound, so it will freewheel until over 4K RPM and then put out the 12 volts needed. There is no fan on the engine and the air ducts blow directly on the cylinders and heads. This setup is terrible for auto-x but GREAT for road racing. When Ron Mistak would bring #22 to the stadium in San Diego, his crew would always have a jumper batt on a cart handy since it would nearly always need jump starts.

There is a third fan on the 22 car located to the rear of the motor and dumping air to the two rear cylinders. Mugs914 works on the car and said there is never a heating problem on the track. Car also has a big oil cooler mounted in the location of the fresh air vent opening in front of the windsheild.

Hell of a car. 2.0L with BMW mechanical fuel injection.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th May 2024 - 05:41 PM