Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> MassIVe redefined., This should seriously influence future "six Vs four" debates
Jake Raby
post Oct 11 2007, 12:44 AM
Post #1


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



This first became a partial solid model 7 years ago. 1.5 years later that solid model was completed by Shad Laws, LN Engineering Co-founder.
Attached Image

Life happened and Shad moved on, leaving with Charles Navarro with a ton of files that were partially completed. After a couple of failed attempts with another billet head design that I began in 2002 (poor exhaust port location) I convinced Charles to allow me a try at getting the "Porkies" head design to a functional state and out of the solid model stages.


Fast forward over two years from that time and you have this MassIVe creation that has been an effort between myself, Tom Digby (The Engineering apprentice currently working with us) and LN Engineering. Charles had already done his part with the development, having assumed all other responsibilities of managing LN Engineering while his (then) partner Shad Laws did NOTHING except the research, design and etc related to these heads and their characteristics, so we have taken things to the next level, but it has been a bumpy road!

These pictures are of Porkies prototype MK-I, it was subject to a machining malfunction and deemed a paper weight about 20 hours into the machining process, but we had the head mostly finished for mock up purposes and to assist with the final rocker arm design before maching the MK-II heads that are 95% finished today, just awaiting pushrod tube bores to be machined and rocker pads to be carved. Of course this particular head has not had the fins cut into it yet- no need as this head will never "run" on an engine. The MK-II heads are fully finned, even fins are cut into the exhaust port OD, and in other areas.

The design needs no intake manifold, the intake flange is designed to accept an IDF Weber patter throttle body DIRECTLY, hence it's shape.

Valve sizes START at 54X46 mm and can go as high as 58.5mm intake and 51mm exhaust on extremely large bore sizes. The MK-II heads, as well as this MK-I prototype are bored for a 106.3mm cylinder, but we'll be testing them with a 105.07mm cylinder from my 3 Liter R/D engine initially and keeping the most conservative valve sizes available. Using this test engine allows direct comparison of this truly MassIVe head against other previous offerings like the German made "Engine Plus" heads, stock big valve TIV heads and the Pauter Super Pro heads, all of which I posess a pair of solely for comparative analysis. The difference is the combustion chamber technology of these heads absolutely supersedes ANYTHING EVER AVAILABLE for pushrod driven aircooled engines. This technology is the only thing we can't picture publicly and thats because of the patent pending processes that Charles is currently exploring.

These heads will have a custom made piston that optimizes the valve angles and combustion chamber characteristics to further optimize the chamber technology. These pistons are completely designed and ready to be machined. We'll also be applying another Nickies cylinder especially made to best suit these heads, designed for Turbo applications to handle insane boost, because these heads are VERY, VERY rigid!

Anyway, here are some pics to make you scratch your head and wonder "Why the hell did they do that.

Yes, they will fit in a 914 engine bay with a custom Tangerine header, since Chris also assisted Shad with the initial research, sizing and exhaust flange characteristics.

Features:
-Porcupine chamber technology (on steroids) with anti detonation features built in allowing up to 11.5:1 CR on PUMP GAS!
-Bores from 100mm up to 111.5mm possible (these are not for something as miniscule as a 2270!)
-OFF THE SHELF Corvette Z06 lightweight valves, springs, seats and retainers are standard (cost effective, latest technology available and readily available anywhere!)
-Standard rocker ratio is 1.6:1, up to 2:1 ratios available on the MK-III race heads
-Rocker arms are billet chromoly steel and "self oilers" for street applications
- Anti-reversion exhaust port design- no stub pipe needed!
- Direct throttle body fitting to the cylinder head for up to 60mm throtle bodies!

The conception of MassIVe performance from a block of billet into the biggest development the Type 4 engine has seen to date.
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 11 2007, 12:51 AM
Post #2


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Top side of business!

Attached Image

No more exhaust port flow challanges!
Attached Image

Tons of fresh real estate in the rocker box- starting from scratch is a true blessing!
Attached Image

Close up of the Anti-reversion exhaust port/stub pipe combo
Attached Image

Yeah, this changes everything in every way possible!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Oct 11 2007, 12:53 AM
Post #3


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/drooley.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 11 2007, 12:55 AM
Post #4


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Mark, now you see why I wanted the "M4" logo so badly!!!

Got any new versions for me??? LOL (damn you did good on that one!)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
hwgunner
post Oct 11 2007, 01:01 AM
Post #5


914 Parts @ Discount Prices 800.321.5432
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,714
Joined: 11-November 04
From: Santa Maria, Ca
Member No.: 3,095
Region Association: None



QUOTE(McMark @ Oct 10 2007, 11:53 PM) *


Ditto
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Oct 11 2007, 01:03 AM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



You saw the latest one from today, right? Tom has that and the T1 one.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
craig downs
post Oct 11 2007, 01:08 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 768
Joined: 25-November 05
From: mira loma ca.
Member No.: 5,189
Region Association: Southern California



All I can say is WOW
I wonder why the factory didn't extend the exhaust like that.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 11 2007, 01:13 AM
Post #8


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE
I wonder why the factory didn't extend the exhaust like that.


Same reason they didn't swap to roller cams, Nickies and etc.


Mark, I was welding all day on a Pinzgauer EFI test plenum and only saw the first versions.. Feel free to post the TIV one here :-)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Oct 11 2007, 01:15 AM
Post #9


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Okay...


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 11 2007, 01:19 AM
Post #10


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Bitchin! EXACTLY what I wanted!
For those that don't know Mcmark was the guy that came up with my current, worldwide recognized "MassIVe" logo like 8 years ago!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PeeGreen 914
post Oct 11 2007, 01:33 AM
Post #11


Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,219
Joined: 21-September 06
From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett
Member No.: 6,884
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



You know Jake. I think I am going to look for a great 914 in a little over a year to put one of you newest engines init. I like the fact that I can do everything with a four...hp, cool running, and such... as you can with a six. Not only that, but it is easier to weight balance a four and it is much lighter. I will be in touch soon. I just need to get a 2.4l in my six first (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 11 2007, 01:43 AM
Post #12


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Or find a 356 or 912 or a beetle!

This beast shoved into a 356 would be ungodly!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PeeGreen 914
post Oct 11 2007, 02:05 AM
Post #13


Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,219
Joined: 21-September 06
From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett
Member No.: 6,884
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Yeah, but spend all that money for a 356 and not have it handle like a 914? I need to stick with the 914s. I had a 911, and I just wanted to do more stuff to m 914 and neglected the 911.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rand
post Oct 11 2007, 02:06 AM
Post #14


Cross Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,409
Joined: 8-February 05
From: OR
Member No.: 3,573
Region Association: None



Amazing Jake. Very cool to see this becoming reality.

Is it way too early to estimate any rough ballpark figures for expected cost and power?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 11 2007, 02:24 AM
Post #15


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



356s handle great and they are lighter than a 914 :-)

I have NO IDEA what the potential for the heads really is HP wise. Based on the calculations of the intake cross sections they will easily flow 300CFM and thats generally good for 1HP/CFM N/A.

But with all the other advancements impacting things too its impossible to say.

None of my software has a template for this chamber design and spark plug location, so its really a total crap shoot and thats what I love!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
grantsfo
post Oct 11 2007, 02:28 AM
Post #16


Arrrrhhhh!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 16-March 03
Member No.: 433
Region Association: None




I'd call that "The Frankenhead"

(IMG:http://www.mr-c.me.uk/BlogImgs/big-frank.jpg)


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 11 2007, 02:31 AM
Post #17


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Right now it's referred to as "The money pit"....

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PeeGreen 914
post Oct 11 2007, 02:49 AM
Post #18


Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,219
Joined: 21-September 06
From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett
Member No.: 6,884
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Oct 11 2007, 01:24 AM) *

356s handle great and they are lighter than a 914 :-)

I have NO IDEA what the potential for the heads really is HP wise. Based on the calculations of the intake cross sections they will easily flow 300CFM and thats generally good for 1HP/CFM N/A.

But with all the other advancements impacting things too its impossible to say.

None of my software has a template for this chamber design and spark plug location, so its really a total crap shoot and thats what I love!


Okay, I am sure a 356 would kick ass, but I just can't reason spending as much for one as I am thinking I would have to drop. I found a fixer for 25,000 the other day, and I was told that it was a steal. One of my buddies has a speedster, and Iget to drive it on the track soon.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 11 2007, 03:21 AM
Post #19


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



I'm working on a deal for a 64 C sunroof that's a good driver car...

I'm keeping it bone stock except a taller 4th gear and fuel injected TIV power.

914s are definately cheaper, but the 356 is money in the bank-
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Oct 11 2007, 07:06 AM
Post #20


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,578
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



Aluminum as art. Amazing work.

Now are you looking at making cases too? Of course you are why did I ask.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th May 2024 - 01:42 PM