Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Converting a 1.7/ 1.8 engine into a 2.0, A new article I just finished
Jake Raby
post Apr 6 2008, 09:47 PM
Post #1


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Here it is posted on my forums. You have to register and be granted access if you are not a current member.

This is a hot topic with a multitude of misunderstanding surrounding it. I hope the article answers all the questions that are posted here on the forums and end up being emailed my way for clarification.

Feel free to post replies/ reviews here or on my forums, where the article is posted.

Jake's 1.7> 2.0 conversion article

I am creating a video (DVD) on this topic for more visual aids and better, more thorough information (the article is actually most of my script for the video)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rick 918-S
post Apr 6 2008, 09:51 PM
Post #2


Hey nice rack! -Celette
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,928
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Now in Superior WI
Member No.: 43
Region Association: Northstar Region



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Apr 6 2008, 07:47 PM) *

Here it is posted on my forums. You have to register and be granted access if you are not a current member.

This is a hot topic with a multitude of misunderstanding surrounding it. I hope the article answers all the questions that are posted here on the forums and end up being emailed my way for clarification.

Feel free to post replies/ reviews here or on my forums, where the article is posted.

Jake's 1.7> 2.0 conversion article

I am creating a video (DVD) on this topic for more visual aids and better, more thorough information (the article is actually most of my script for the video)



Dead link, why not just post it here?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post Apr 6 2008, 10:16 PM
Post #3


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,096
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Fixed the link...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
G e o r g e
post Apr 6 2008, 10:22 PM
Post #4


Dr
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,905
Joined: 20-September 05
From: Southern Cal
Member No.: 4,832
Region Association: None



link worked for me
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post Apr 6 2008, 10:23 PM
Post #5


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,096
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



That's because I fixed it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Apr 7 2008, 11:18 AM
Post #6


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



After having my tech articles stolen in 2004 by Stromberg I must now seriously watch how and where I post intellectual property. When users sign on to my forums they are required to accept my rules and regulations governing items like this tech article. If the article should fall into the wrong hands and end up on someone else's website (like what happened in 2004 word for word) I will be able to use the legal system to my advantage much more effectively.

When I post something ehre on these forums, or anyone else's forums it becomes their property and I lose my ability to contriol how it is used in the future...

Thats why the article is posted on my online community....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JoeSharp
post Apr 7 2008, 05:50 PM
Post #7


In Irvine, Ca. May 15-18
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,947
Joined: 9-July 03
From: DeLand, Florida
Member No.: 898
Region Association: South East States



Link worked but thew site wouldn't let me register.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Apr 7 2008, 07:36 PM
Post #8


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Thats odd, what message did it give you??? I signed up 40 new members today and I don't believe anyone had any issues..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jesiv
post Apr 7 2008, 09:36 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 552
Joined: 5-August 07
From: Pensacola/Milton, Florida
Member No.: 7,975
Region Association: Northern California



Awesome article! My goal (1975 1.8L) is to get has much HP but maintain FI. How much HP is realistic and could/should I convert to D-Jet from l-jet?

As always, thank you for your considered opinions.

James


PS on the sign up I had problems with the referrer. I tried to enter 914world and Jake finally left it blank and it worked.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Apr 7 2008, 10:07 PM
Post #10


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Cool.. Glad you got in..

The threshold for stock FI performance is 115 HP and I have a "safe" combination that is proven to make this reliably. There is a current thread on the subjsct on my forums now-
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jesiv
post Apr 7 2008, 11:11 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 552
Joined: 5-August 07
From: Pensacola/Milton, Florida
Member No.: 7,975
Region Association: Northern California



So how would this compare to an original 6? I am trying to get a reference point for 35% increase in HP. Is it a more nimble 6? Where do you feel the difference?

Regards,

James


Does anyone in the Bay Area have something like this that I could catch a ride in and experience a 115 HP teener? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cevan
post Apr 8 2008, 06:51 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,079
Joined: 11-December 06
From: Western Massachusetts
Member No.: 7,351



If using 1.8 heads and carbs for this conversion, do you need to change the intake studs from 4 to 3, or in other words, are all intake runners for carbs 3 bolt? If so, do the outer 2 studs stay put and the inner two removed ad replaced with one?

If using L-Jet, are there any adjustments or modifications that need to be made to it?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
type47
post Apr 8 2008, 08:11 AM
Post #13


Viermeister
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,254
Joined: 7-August 03
From: Vienna, VA
Member No.: 994
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(Cevan @ Apr 8 2008, 04:51 AM) *

are all intake runners for carbs 3 bolt? If so, do the outer 2 studs stay put and the inner two removed ad replaced with one?


i don't think so. in fact, i remember seeing a set of intake manifolds with 5 holes drilled so that it would fit both a 1.8 (4 studs) and a 2.0 (3 studs). it may have been drilled by the owner but.....

an option if using 1.8 heads with d-jet is to get a set of intake runners that already have the 4 hole. the size of the runners are the same for 1.8 and 2.0.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Apr 8 2008, 09:18 AM
Post #14


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



The only heads or runners that have 3 studs are the 2.0/914 components.

If someone used 2.0/914 heads for their conversion from a 1.7, they would need the matching intake runners.

If you stick with the 1.8L heads the 1.7 runners will work, but they are smaller- the 1.8 runners are larger and still bolt right up with the same bolt spacing.

QUOTE
So how would this compare to an original 6? I am trying to get a reference point for 35% increase in HP. Is it a more nimble 6? Where do you feel the difference?

Regards,

James


Does anyone in the Bay Area have something like this that I could catch a ride in and experience a 115 HP teener?


Do some searches.. You'll find many people who have used my components to build these 115HP engines that still use the factory EFI.

This article was for guys converting a 1.7/1.8 OE engine into a 2.0 engine. The interchange of components and the reasons why things are swapped was my only objective.

If you want to compare a 2.0/6 to a 2.0/4 that is an entirely different topic.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EdArango
post Aug 23 2010, 08:08 PM
Post #15


914 Enthusiast
**

Group: Members
Posts: 267
Joined: 30-January 10
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Member No.: 11,309
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Apr 6 2008, 08:47 PM) *

Here it is posted on my forums. You have to register and be granted access if you are not a current member.

This is a hot topic with a multitude of misunderstanding surrounding it. I hope the article answers all the questions that are posted here on the forums and end up being emailed my way for clarification.

Feel free to post replies/ reviews here or on my forums, where the article is posted.

Jake's 1.7> 2.0 conversion article

I am creating a video (DVD) on this topic for more visual aids and better, more thorough information (the article is actually most of my script for the video)

Jake......Why is it that I can't get into any of the forum/threads on your site by following your link? I set up an account the other day.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Aug 24 2010, 12:16 AM
Post #16


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Your permissions may not be active yet. Did you click on the link that my site emailed to you? If not you can't post as the account registration is not complete yet.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Aug 24 2010, 09:22 AM
Post #17


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,036
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(jesiv @ Apr 8 2008, 02:11 AM) *

So how would this compare to an original 6? I am trying to get a reference point for 35% increase in HP. Is it a more nimble 6? Where do you feel the difference?

Regards,

James


Does anyone in the Bay Area have something like this that I could catch a ride in and experience a 115 HP teener? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif)


The 2056 is quicker in the low revs as it has more torque there than a six but a six also revs to 6800 rpms with hp so you drive a stock six differently. Longer between shifts as you rev it out . The four you shift at 5000 rpms as thats where the power is...and it feels quicker to me with less engine weight. The stock six has carbs too so its louder and just a different feel but a 2056 with FI (Djet or Ljet) has really smooth power thru the gears.....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2025 - 07:58 PM