Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> stock 2.0 dyno printout, from Jake Raby's website
reverie
post Feb 2 2004, 10:03 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 783
Joined: 14-March 03
Member No.: 427
Region Association: None



Here's a printout from Jake's website.. ~ 77 hp, 103 ft-lbs.

I'd like to know how to compare my stock 2.0's output (73 hp, 88 ft-lbs at the rear wheels) to this printout.
Is "corrected engine output" estimated from output at the rear wheels?


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Feb 2 2004, 10:13 PM
Post #2


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



My Dyno measures flywheel HP.

The *MOST* I have ever seen from a stock 2.0 was 86BHP at the flywheel..

I'd like to see the math from the chassis dyno as it sounds a tad off to me.

The engine shown in this graph is a typical stock 2.0, in fact it was the very last one I built that was 100% stock about 3 years ago... The fuel curve should be much flatter and around the .60 range. The stock cam can be attributed to this through inefficiency.

The fuel curve should be a mirror image of the torque plot with a slight dip at peak torque since thats the point where the engine is making the most power with the least amount of fuel...

Your engine sounds typical, and not really tired at 135 psi, I like to see 145 but 135 ain't too shabby as long as leak down is good as well.

BTW, I *THINK* that this was a Bus Spec 2.0 and not a 914 spec... Big difference..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Feb 2 2004, 10:28 PM
Post #3


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,036
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



The stock 2.0l cars I have seen on a dynoday is around 75-85 Hp.

Geoff
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
reverie
post Feb 2 2004, 10:42 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 783
Joined: 14-March 03
Member No.: 427
Region Association: None



Thanks, Jake and Geoff.. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

Jake, you are very quick.. lol
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th July 2025 - 05:29 AM