Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Is this what a "ballast resistor" looks like?, I have little faith in the Radio Shack guy
Porsche Rescue
post Sep 22 2008, 09:35 AM
Post #1


Saving and Enjoying Old Porsches
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,978
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Bend, Oregon
Member No.: 64
Region Association: None



I'm trying to follow the suggestion of Brad Anders and others on this board. They recommend trying a 270 ohm ballast resistor in the the head temp sensor line as a way to richen the mixture as a fix for a poor cold running engine.

I asked for such a resistor and this is all the Radio Shack guy could provide. I had a choice between 220 ohms and 330 so I took 220. What concerns me is that the word "ballast" is nowhere on the item. Are these what I want or do I need keep looking?

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Sep 22 2008, 09:57 AM
Post #2


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,858
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



the 270 ohm is available in factory form, but a 12 v radio shack 270 ohm would suffice placed in line with the head temp sensor. It was used to solve the hot running problems not cold running as the temp sensor at a full 2750 did fine to make the car run well cold. The residual 50 or so ohms the sensor provided hot was not quite enough on some of the high compression 2.0 models to give them the fatness of air to fuel ratio when hot so the factory then suggested and produced the resistor to cure this problem make the idle and whole range better (richer)
I would suggest that if you have a cold running problem the resistor is not the solution
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Spoke
post Sep 22 2008, 09:58 AM
Post #3


Jerry
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,978
Joined: 29-October 04
From: Allentown, PA
Member No.: 3,031
Region Association: None



If you need a 270 ohm resistor and can only find 220 ohm, you can use 2 resistors in series to achieve 270 like 220 + 47 = 267 ohms.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
So.Cal.914
post Sep 22 2008, 10:12 AM
Post #4


"...And it has a front trunk too."
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,588
Joined: 15-February 04
From: Low Desert, CA./ Hills of N.J.
Member No.: 1,658
Region Association: None



QUOTE
What concerns me is that the word "ballast" is nowhere on the item. Are these what I want or do I need keep looking?



Yup they look like a ballast or load resistor. At that value they don't need to be very large. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jasons
post Sep 22 2008, 10:28 AM
Post #5


Jackstand Extraordinaire
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,002
Joined: 19-August 04
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Member No.: 2,573
Region Association: None



FWIW My car had a lean idle hunt when fully warm with the 270. I ended up using a variable resistor to dial out the hunt. 270 wasn't enough, I think I ended up in the mid 300's. Now it idles rock steady when warm.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Porsche Rescue
post Sep 22 2008, 10:40 AM
Post #6


Saving and Enjoying Old Porsches
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,978
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Bend, Oregon
Member No.: 64
Region Association: None



I have another thread on the board asking advice. My problem is: Car starts hard and requires lots of throttle action to keep it going. It coughs and sputters until it is fully warm (5 minutes or more on the road) and then runs perfectly, good idle, good acceleration, good power.
I replaced head temp sensor (not necessary, but did it anyway). It is correct for ECU according to Anders chart. ECU is correct for '70 1.7. AAR is open cold, closed hot. I did complete resistance check on all circuits from the ECU plug as per Anders and all were on spec. That led me to the resistor as a last resort.
Other ideas welcome and appreciated.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
So.Cal.914
post Sep 22 2008, 10:47 AM
Post #7


"...And it has a front trunk too."
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,588
Joined: 15-February 04
From: Low Desert, CA./ Hills of N.J.
Member No.: 1,658
Region Association: None



QUOTE(jasons @ Sep 22 2008, 09:28 AM) *

FWIW My car had a lean idle hunt when fully warm with the 270. I ended up using a variable resistor to dial out the hunt. 270 wasn't enough, I think I ended up in the mid 300's. Now it idles rock steady when warm.


Useing a potentiometer was a cleaver out of the box solution. Good thinking. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jasons
post Sep 22 2008, 10:52 AM
Post #8


Jackstand Extraordinaire
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,002
Joined: 19-August 04
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Member No.: 2,573
Region Association: None



QUOTE(So.Cal.914 @ Sep 22 2008, 09:47 AM) *



Useing a potentiometer was a cleaver out of the box solution. Good thinking. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)



I can't take credit, I think I read someone here did it. The lean idle hunt was driving me nuts and that fixed it. And, the car sails through emissions in AZ.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Sep 22 2008, 12:04 PM
Post #9


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



go back to radio shack.
Buy a variable rate potentiometer (a trun style volume knob)
0-1k ohms rated.

Drive and turn, gently each time.
Use an ohm meter to test the setting each time you turn it.
Once you are happy, go back to radio shack and buy one or several resistors (like you show above) put them inline to add up to the same value the potentiometer was reading when you were happy.

remove the potentiometer and replace it with the resistors.

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Sep 22 2008, 12:54 PM
Post #10


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,143
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=84088
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tod914
post Sep 22 2008, 01:03 PM
Post #11


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,755
Joined: 19-January 03
From: Lincoln Park, NJ
Member No.: 170



Please let me know what your low idle solution is. I'm very curious myself.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
orange914
post Sep 23 2008, 01:04 AM
Post #12


http://5starmediaworks.com/index.html
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,371
Joined: 26-March 05
From: Ceres, California
Member No.: 3,818
Region Association: Northern California



i've got the real deal (fact. 2.0/039 ecu resister) from a 73 2.0.
$20 +whatever shipping is to ya

mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Sep 23 2008, 09:29 AM
Post #13


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(Porsche Rescue @ Sep 22 2008, 09:40 AM) *

I have another thread on the board asking advice. My problem is: Car starts hard and requires lots of throttle action to keep it going. It coughs and sputters until it is fully warm (5 minutes or more on the road) and then runs perfectly, good idle, good acceleration, good power.
I replaced head temp sensor (not necessary, but did it anyway). It is correct for ECU according to Anders chart. ECU is correct for '70 1.7. AAR is open cold, closed hot. I did complete resistance check on all circuits from the ECU plug as per Anders and all were on spec. That led me to the resistor as a last resort.
Other ideas welcome and appreciated.



My thoughts on hard cold starting are that the grounds/wiring are corroded so getting the proper electricity to the coil/dizzy is the problem. You must have fuel and good spark.

changing the cold mix is a bandaid fix until you find the root cause. Look for a vacuum leak too. Poor manifold gaskets act like this as they seal when the get warmed up.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mike_the_man
post Sep 23 2008, 05:35 PM
Post #14


I like stuff!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,338
Joined: 11-June 03
From: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Member No.: 809



What about the Cold Start Injector? I can't remember how cold it has to be for the injector to fire, but could that contribute? The more I think about it, the less likely that is. The cold start injector only fires when the starting is cranking, correct? I guess that's not likely it. Sorry for the pointless post! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Porsche Rescue
post Sep 23 2008, 06:04 PM
Post #15


Saving and Enjoying Old Porsches
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,978
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Bend, Oregon
Member No.: 64
Region Association: None



Hi Mike. You're right, only when cranking and less than 50 degrees I think. Thanks for the help anyway. I will muddle on. I have a back-up ECU which I may try just for kicks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
orange914
post Sep 23 2008, 10:35 PM
Post #16


http://5starmediaworks.com/index.html
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,371
Joined: 26-March 05
From: Ceres, California
Member No.: 3,818
Region Association: Northern California



i always thought the resister richened up the full rpm range. from there you could set idle as long as off idle up is good... no???
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Porsche Rescue
post Sep 24 2008, 10:14 AM
Post #17


Saving and Enjoying Old Porsches
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,978
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Bend, Oregon
Member No.: 64
Region Association: None



D-jet guru Brad Anders suggests the resistor as a last resort solution to my type of problem. He agrees with you that it richens the mixture over the entire range. He suggests a switch in the cockpit to delete the resistor from the circuit when the car is warm.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Porsche Rescue
post Sep 30 2008, 10:08 AM
Post #18


Saving and Enjoying Old Porsches
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,978
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Bend, Oregon
Member No.: 64
Region Association: None





changing the cold mix is a bandaid fix until you find the root cause. Look for a vacuum leak too. Poor manifold gaskets act like this as they seal when the get warmed up.
[/quote]

Thanks Geoff. I have been too busy lately to work on the car, but I am anxious to check the torque on the intake manifolds. This engine has less than 5K on a DIY rebuild by the PO (pretty competent guy I think). I can't find any vacuum leaks in the ususal places.
Is it also possible that the heads could be "loose" as well, self-sealing with expansion when hot?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Sep 30 2008, 01:27 PM
Post #19


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,143
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



To answer your original question of "ballast resistor" it is more of an application thing. It is the use of a resistor in a ballast situation. That really does not mean much in this instance. What this resistor does is shift the operation range.
The resistors you have are fine, but I don't think they are suited to the wattage very well. See the photo in the link I provided above of an original resistor. To use what you have, put two in parallel, in series with two more in parallel; thus using four resistors and quadrupling the wattage while keeping the resistance the same. Do the same with some 47 ohm resistors, and add them in series to get very close to the 270 ohm original.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 06:44 AM