Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Need help I.D'ing an older Mercedes engine, cap'n ? Rick ?
scotty b
post Oct 16 2008, 06:45 PM
Post #1


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



I'm looking for a early 70's 6.3 or 6.9 engine and trans for a hot rod project. The guy I used to work for has an early V8 he swapped out several years ago, he THINKS is a 450 SEL. How can I tell the difference between the high horse 6.3 & 6.9 and the lesser horse 4.5 ? I have always been confuzicated by M.B. badgiung because it never seems to have any bearing on engine displacement (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ws91420
post Oct 16 2008, 06:58 PM
Post #2


Yes I have one a Lensley 914
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,063
Joined: 10-September 03
From: Ruther Glen,VA (halfway between sticks and civilization)
Member No.: 1,137
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



engine designation is M100 and was found in 70 450SEL featured a dry sump oil system as well
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty b
post Oct 16 2008, 06:59 PM
Post #3


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



Additional question. Did all of the 6.3 6.9 engines use the " log " style intake runners? The engine he has has a low profiule manifold with the t.b. in the center and the whole intake setup sits barely above the cam covers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty b
post Oct 16 2008, 07:00 PM
Post #4


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



QUOTE(ws91420 @ Oct 16 2008, 04:58 PM) *

engine designation is M100 and was found in 70 450SEL featured a dry sump oil system as well



That designaiton is only for the larger displacement engines? And where would it be located on the block ?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Oct 16 2008, 07:21 PM
Post #5


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



6.9s were dry sump, or so I've found on Google. Pretty easy to i.d. THAT! CIS injection. The 6.3 had 2 long kinda tubular intake manifolds that come together at the throttle body in front of the right cam cover. Identified as the M100 engine, and there are numbers somewhere on the left side of the block, as I recall. Maybe at the flywheel end. The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty b
post Oct 16 2008, 07:27 PM
Post #6


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



Yup the rumnner are what I referred to as " log " style. I have a pic of one I know to be a 6.3. Problem I have is identifying the engine my friend has. His does not have that style intake but he says it is a 450 sel. I'm assumoing it may be a later style with a different intake ? I'll try to get a pic tomorrow if I have time to go that way. This IS a 1970 300 sel 6.3, and I beleive the 6.9 looks the same. I want this style not nly for the H.P. but the runners would be very easy to cap the ends off, reverse the stance and put an adapter plate for a carb...or 3....... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Hot rod ya know, I can't run messy F.I. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty b
post Oct 16 2008, 07:29 PM
Post #7


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Intake option 1. pretty easy to make


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty b
post Oct 16 2008, 07:54 PM
Post #8


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



Well after a bit more research I found a pic of the intake on hois engine. The guy says it is off of a 4.5 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) FUCH. My friend also has a complete car we used to bomb around in, all I remember is it was FAST. I'm guessing it has the larger engine. I'm alsoi guessing it could be mine since he has a 911 he wants painted (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif)

Pic of the 4.5 intake FWIW



Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Oct 16 2008, 08:10 PM
Post #9


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 42,201
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(scotty b @ Oct 16 2008, 05:54 PM) *

The guy says it is off of a 4.5 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) FUCH.

Geeze, you guys are spoiled ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)


Back in the early '90s, i had a 280 SE with a 2.8L /6 and i thought that car was fast ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Andy
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty b
post Oct 16 2008, 08:14 PM
Post #10


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Oct 16 2008, 06:10 PM) *

QUOTE(scotty b @ Oct 16 2008, 05:54 PM) *

The guy says it is off of a 4.5 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) FUCH.

Geeze, you guys are spoiled ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)


Back in the early '90s, i had a 280 SE with a 2.8L /6 and i thought that car was fast ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Andy


How's that 1.7 running ? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/av-943.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Oct 16 2008, 08:29 PM
Post #11


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



Here's a low quality photo of a 6.9. The intake you have is a 4.5 style with EFI.

The Cap'n


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
arvcube
post Oct 16 2008, 09:27 PM
Post #12


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 170
Joined: 25-September 07
From: poway, ca
Member No.: 8,147



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Oct 16 2008, 06:10 PM) *

QUOTE(scotty b @ Oct 16 2008, 05:54 PM) *

The guy says it is off of a 4.5 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) FUCH.

Geeze, you guys are spoiled ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)


Back in the early '90s, i had a 280 SE with a 2.8L /6 and i thought that car was fast ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Andy


I had a 71 300sel with the 3.5L/8 and i thought that was fast. It had the same type manifold with the downdraft throttle body as that one pictured as it was EFI.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Oct 17 2008, 12:36 PM
Post #13


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,301
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Pops had a 6.9. That car was fast. Faster than my SHO and that was fast.

Put that cross-ram on it! (ooooooooops sorry, wrong post)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty b
post Oct 17 2008, 07:49 PM
Post #14


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Eric_Shea @ Oct 17 2008, 10:36 AM) *

Pops had a 6.9. That car was fast. Faster than my SHO and that was fast.

Put that cross-ram on it! (ooooooooops sorry, wrong post)



I'm gonna find a cross ram ...turn it sideways and shove it sqwah up yer arse !! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/av-943.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
championgt1
post Oct 17 2008, 08:11 PM
Post #15


Don't embarrass me Filmore!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,681
Joined: 3-January 07
From: Tacoma, Washington
Member No.: 7,420
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



The 300 SEL 6.3 and 6.9 were serious sleepers. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Oct 17 2008, 08:32 PM
Post #16


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,301
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE
I'm gonna find a cross ram ...turn it sideways and shove it sqwah up yer arse !!


That does it Mister. From now on we require you use your real full name on this site! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

(IMG:http://www.monicattichrysler.com/comersus/store/catalog/p5007534_hc-300.jpg)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty b
post Oct 17 2008, 08:38 PM
Post #17


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Eric_Shea @ Oct 17 2008, 06:32 PM) *



Big Dick McGee
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2025 - 12:56 PM