Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> New engine design, Anyone see this before
Phoenix-MN
post Mar 28 2009, 05:47 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 927
Joined: 23-January 04
From: ST. Bonifacius,MN
Member No.: 1,590



Neat simple design, if it doesn't have any seal problems not much to wear out. The demo animation take a while to download

http://kugelmotor.peraves.ch/index_en.htm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ericread
post Mar 28 2009, 06:10 PM
Post #2


The Viper Blue 914
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,177
Joined: 7-December 07
From: Irvine, CA (The OC)
Member No.: 8,432
Region Association: Southern California



Seems kind of similar to the Wankel engine in many respects. Any thoughts on this?

Eric
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
So.Cal.914
post Mar 28 2009, 06:14 PM
Post #3


"...And it has a front trunk too."
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,588
Joined: 15-February 04
From: Low Desert, CA./ Hills of N.J.
Member No.: 1,658
Region Association: None



I don't know how much it's like a Wankel but it's not a piston engine. It will be interesting to see how it plays out. Bet it revs like a MoFo.


Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
904svo
post Mar 28 2009, 07:08 PM
Post #4


904SVO
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,118
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Woodstock,Georgia
Member No.: 5,146



Reminds me of the squash plate engine from the 2nd world war.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lotus_65
post Mar 28 2009, 07:13 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,608
Joined: 21-March 05
From: minneapolis, mn
Member No.: 3,795
Region Association: Northstar Region



... a way better option... IMHO (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
(IMG:http://www.revetec.com/images/x4.gif)
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...&hl=revetec
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jcambo7
post Mar 28 2009, 07:17 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,664
Joined: 24-December 08
From: Graham, WA
Member No.: 9,867
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



hm...looks interesting. Wonder if it is powerful enough for a car though? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Todd Enlund
post Mar 28 2009, 07:39 PM
Post #7


Resident Photoshop Guru
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,251
Joined: 24-August 07
From: Laurelhurst (Portland), Oregon
Member No.: 8,032
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



3 moving parts my ass.

Looks like it's somewhere between a piston and a Wankel. Still has parts that must accelerate/decelerate on each rotation, although not to the extent that a piston does. The rotary valve is going to limit breathing, but it has forced induction to compensate.

For all it's shortcomings, I think the Wankel design is far superior.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Mar 28 2009, 08:42 PM
Post #8


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



That is really cool.
amazing what people invent.

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RJMII
post Mar 28 2009, 09:52 PM
Post #9


Jim McIntosh
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,125
Joined: 11-September 07
From: Sandy, Utah
Member No.: 8,112
Region Association: None



QUOTE(r_towle @ Mar 28 2009, 08:42 PM) *

That is really cool.
amazing what people invent.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dbgriffith75
post Mar 28 2009, 11:50 PM
Post #10


TheGrif
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 25-July 07
From: Iowa, USA
Member No.: 7,945
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Todd Enlund @ Mar 28 2009, 08:39 PM) *

3 moving parts my ass.

Looks like it's somewhere between a piston and a Wankel. Still has parts that must accelerate/decelerate on each rotation, although not to the extent that a piston does. The rotary valve is going to limit breathing, but it has forced induction to compensate.

For all it's shortcomings, I think the Wankel design is far superior.


Unfortunately the video is not mac compatible, so I couldn't watch it.

I agree with you Todd, but at this point in time it's a new idea- with a few more years of R+D they may really have a breakthrough in engine tech. Plus I think the fact that they do have a working prototype speaks for the engine's potential, even if it is just a scooter.

It will be interesting to see where this goes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post Mar 29 2009, 07:04 AM
Post #11


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,075
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(dbgriffith75 @ Mar 28 2009, 11:50 PM) *
Unfortunately the video is not mac compatible, so I couldn't watch it.


Seriously? There are probably other ways also to get it done, but I've been using this on my macbook for over 2 years.


flip4mac link on apple.com

Literal URL for the paranoid types:
CODE
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/video/flip4macwindowsmediacomponentsforquicktime.html
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dlestep
post Mar 29 2009, 08:14 AM
Post #12


I am smilin'...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 890
Joined: 15-January 08
From: Sunrise Florida
Member No.: 8,573
Region Association: South East States



...the animation does not represent the side loading on the guides. The ceramic hemi-spheres take the loads perpendicular, instead of axial. There will be a lot of internal friction at those four points. It will not be able to sustain high rpms because of that loading. Sintered ceramics are hard, but very brittle.
Also the work side of that stroke is loosing power because no matter how much force is created, the guide slots control the rate of expansion.
I see intake flow restrictions at six places. The intake pulse will not be stable and will have dead spots. The rotating disks at certain rpms will create problems as well. Even their port shape has problems.
but that's just me.....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Katmanken
post Mar 29 2009, 08:16 AM
Post #13


You haven't seen me if anybody asks...
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,738
Joined: 14-June 03
From: USA
Member No.: 819
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Nah, it's a piston engine.....

Friction and high loads looks like it might be a problem.. Those pistons have large surface areas that rub flat on flat, not a ring in a cylinder. The power transmission depends on the spreading pistons pushing on those balls and the balls push against the figure 8 grooves in the case to provide rotary power to the crank. Hopefully they have optimized the surface areas with a little careful analysis, but spheres tend to apply point loads (aka aw shit, very high). Rollers might be a better choice ( a line of contact and lower loading) but they might have to be a funky tapered shape.

Haven't thought it out completely but I suspect that the balls may have to change rotational direction as they travel around the grooves (move together, move apart). If they do, the rotating balls will have inertia and slamming them to a stop and reversing rotational direction causes "interesting" wear and noise problems. I saw a Rovac air conditioner at one time with a similar problem. Theoretically, it worked great and actually provided tons of cooling from a very small unit with NO FREON. In actuality, it put out SOOO much noise from the bearings changing direction, it made your ears bleed. They said that they initially had wear issues from the directional changes, but had overcome them.

I bet wear of a spherical ball in a case groove might be a problem and might require a ceramic case($$$$$$$). Ceramic on ceramic is an ok bearing surface, but I'm not sure what a little hydrocarbon byproduct woud do to gum up the works.

That being said, its way cool, let's build one and see what the heck happens....
And a little long term testing will really tell how well it works.

Ken


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Wilhelm
post Mar 29 2009, 09:01 AM
Post #14


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 408
Joined: 7-September 07
From: Hooterville, OR
Member No.: 8,088
Region Association: None



"Unfortunately the video is not mac compatible, so I couldn't watch it."

Go to versiontracker.com download VLC. You'll be able to look at almost anything and can even copy scenes from movies.

Oh, and the engine...That would be crazy to machine all those surfaces. What maintains the seals between the walls of the orb and combustion chambers?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Katmanken
post Mar 29 2009, 09:27 AM
Post #15


You haven't seen me if anybody asks...
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,738
Joined: 14-June 03
From: USA
Member No.: 819
Region Association: Upper MidWest



You can machine ceramics to a nats ass.

Japanese ceramic company brought in a play toy sample that was about 5 inches long and comprised a long piston and rod assembly. The rod slid in the bore without much resistance, and could draw a vacuum.

And the price was $350 or so in quantity...

$$$pendy $$tuff

Ken
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rascobo
post Mar 29 2009, 09:12 PM
Post #16


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 203
Joined: 26-July 07
From: Portland,OR.
Member No.: 7,948
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Somewhat off topic, but does anyone remember the name of the engine being developed by an Aussie inventor (early 90's?)that seemed to have so much potential, and generated a lot of press, and what became of it?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dbgriffith75
post Mar 30 2009, 12:07 AM
Post #17


TheGrif
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 25-July 07
From: Iowa, USA
Member No.: 7,945
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Wilhelm @ Mar 29 2009, 10:01 AM) *

"Unfortunately the video is not mac compatible, so I couldn't watch it."

Go to versiontracker.com download VLC. You'll be able to look at almost anything and can even copy scenes from movies.

Oh, and the engine...That would be crazy to machine all those surfaces. What maintains the seals between the walls of the orb and combustion chambers?



Thanks for the link Wilhelm.

And now that I've seen the video... I stand by my previous statements.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Katmanken
post Mar 30 2009, 06:13 PM
Post #18


You haven't seen me if anybody asks...
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,738
Joined: 14-June 03
From: USA
Member No.: 819
Region Association: Upper MidWest



That other Aussie engine was the Orbital Engine. Did a search, the company is working on things other than that engine and Wikipedia had an answer...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_engine

Hmmm..... site seems buggy, It won't let me post a link... I get a title error and an url error....

Ken
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th May 2024 - 11:01 PM