Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Copper fins instead of iron or aluminum??, for cylinders...........
Mueller
post Mar 7 2004, 03:22 PM
Post #1


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



Just wondering if anyone has seen this or expermented with such an idea??

LN Engineering has (or had, not sure if they still make 'em or not) iron cylinders pressed into an aluminum fin arrangment.......cost wise they are decent, but I know the cooling of thier "nickies" is far, far superior

Now copper is even better than aluminum at getting rid of the heat, so I thought that would be an interesting material to try out....of course the cost and softness of copper would not make it an ideal material for the entire cylinder...........


thoughts???
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Mar 7 2004, 03:38 PM
Post #2


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,143
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



Well, copper is a better conductor than aluminum or iron, but then silver and diamond are even better than copper. Diamond should have better wear characteristics than the iron for bore material, and would also offer the benfit of watching the combustion process. Now as far as cost and thermal rates of expansion, I think we run into problems. I have worked with copper fins on an aluminum heatsink before without noticable improvements. There are several problems with dual materials in this applicaton. First is the introduction of a thermal interface between the two; that tends to be the biggie. Next is differing rates of thermal expansion; tends to cause separation or cracking.. Third is galvanic corrosion. In my experience, as a thermal scientist, improvements in airflow and surface area would provide bigger results for less cost.

DaveP
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mikester
post Mar 7 2004, 07:51 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 326
Joined: 18-June 03
From: CA
Member No.: 837



In my computer I have a pure copper heat sink on my CPU. with a large case fan over it running a bit slowly (quiet). It does a great job of keeping my cpu cool. Much better than those crappy aluminum heat sinks with the fan bolted directly on. The thing is, the aluminum is failry light and the copper is about 20 times heavyer. Seriously - H-E-A-V-Y.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Mar 7 2004, 09:07 PM
Post #4


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE
Third is galvanic corrosion.


to help stop/control this how about using a heat sink compound(silver instead of silicon) in between the iron and the copper? Most of these are good for 200°C

for the differing thermal expansion, the fins could hinged or have springs to compensate for the expansion/contraction.....

i guess I was out it the sun too much today
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Mar 7 2004, 09:10 PM
Post #5


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



How about gold or silver fins? They don't react with iron.

Geoff
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Mar 7 2004, 10:02 PM
Post #6


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



[QUOTE=Mueller,Mar 7 2004, 07:07 PM] [QUOTE]
i guess I was out it the sun too much today
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif) [/QUOTE]
Really?
Seemed like one of your "normal" days to me (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Mar 7 2004, 10:47 PM
Post #7


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,986
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



The "Biral Babies" turned out to be too expensive to make. LN did one small run of them, but stopped and won't be offering them again soon, from what I hear. Charles said he was considering using a cheaper, lower-quality manufacturing method, but that he didn't think it was worthwhile to cheapen the product like that.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
maf914
post Mar 8 2004, 07:42 AM
Post #8


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



QUOTE(davep @ Mar 7 2004, 01:38 PM)
Well, copper is a better conductor than aluminum or iron, but then silver and diamond are even better than copper.

DaveP

I have never heard diamond mentioned as a good heat conductor. But as you note, the cost would typically keep it from being used for one. I would have assumed it would conduct heat in a manner similar to glass.

Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
banderson
post Mar 8 2004, 08:01 AM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 88
Joined: 22-August 03
From: Massachusetts
Member No.: 1,064



DATA:

Thermal conductivity, BTU/hr-ft-DegreeF
205---Copper, 145 (free machining)
104---Aluminum, 6061
28-----Grey cast Iron

Thermal Expansion
9.9---Copper, 145 (free machining)
13----Aluminum, 6061
5.8---Grey cast Iron

Summary, Aluminum is 5 times more conductive than iron. Cu doubles that again. In terms of expansion, you have to plan for it in your bolts, but Cu would be less extreme than aluminum. $/lb-?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Mar 8 2004, 08:56 AM
Post #10


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE
I have never heard diamond mentioned as a good heat conductor.


diamonds are 10 times more efficient than aluminum when it comes to conductivity.......
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
maf914
post Mar 8 2004, 09:23 AM
Post #11


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mueller @ Mar 8 2004, 06:56 AM)
QUOTE
I have never heard diamond mentioned as a good heat conductor.


diamonds are 10 times more efficient than aluminum when it comes to conductivity.......

Interesting. How about other gem stones? Must be that crystal molecular structure. I must have missed the heat conduction discussion during my materials classes! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Mar 8 2004, 09:39 AM
Post #12


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,143
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



Other gemstones? Not that I'm aware of, and I try to keep up with thermal data on a weekly basis.
Yes, definitely the crystal structure. Some forms of carbon are very conductive, but it can be very directional.
As far as thermal grease, that adds another interface and a lower conductivity material. The only use for such greases is to fill in the microscopic void (air bubbles) between surfaces. If the aluminum were cast onto the iron cylinder there should not be much to worry about. They have used this technology for years, and it is not too popular now for good reasons. I'd have to say that the "Nickies" are the state of the art. You only get what you pay for.

Mike, glass is a liquid, very viscious but a liquid. Diamond is a crystal. Very different in so many ways. Do not confuse crystal stemware with cheap glass imitations. They are very different.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fiid
post Mar 8 2004, 10:44 AM
Post #13


Turbo Megasquirted Subaru Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,827
Joined: 7-April 03
From: San Francisco, CA
Member No.: 530
Region Association: Northern California



Diamond is a pretty damned cool material.

I read in Wired a few months ago that there are a couple of companies that specialise in manufacturing synthetic diamonds, much to the annoyance of DeBeers. They tend to produce purer diamonds that may at some point be viable for more industrial applications like cylinders, etc. There is also some interest in producing integrated cicuits based on diamond, which will also gain from better heat dissipation.

Maybe in the next 10 years we will see a time when it is not utterly impossible to have diamond cylinders!

In that time, I'm sure Mueller will get the appropriate machinery for his workshop :-) LOL
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
maf914
post Mar 8 2004, 12:04 PM
Post #14


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



QUOTE(davep @ Mar 8 2004, 07:39 AM)
Mike, glass is a liquid, very viscious but a liquid. Diamond is a crystal. Very different in so many ways. Do not confuse crystal stemware with cheap glass imitations. They are very different.

Glass a liquid? You're right. Now I remember. That's why old glass panes distort, they're flowing.

I figured I was wrong about glass being a similar conductor to diamond when I started to think about the crystalline structure of diamond.

Now, stemware. What is quality crystal stemware if not glass? I always thought the word "crystal" was used to denote high quality glass ware.

Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Mar 8 2004, 12:42 PM
Post #15


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,986
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



I have read recently that the "glass is a liquid" is incorrect. A quick Google search turns up, among other things, this link:
http://www.glassnotes.com/WindowPanes.html

Isn't glass actually an amorphous solid? Different from a crystal, certainly, but not a liquid.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
maf914
post Mar 8 2004, 12:55 PM
Post #16


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



Damn! Another urban myth bites the dust!

I like the statement "Half of the pieces in a window are thicker at the bottom, he said, but, he added quickly, the other half are thicker at the top."

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Mar 8 2004, 04:46 PM
Post #17


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,143
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



I stand corrected. I've always claimed to be a "mad physicist", now you know the emphasis should be on the "mad". Heck, I even get angry sometimes! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
John Kelly
post Mar 9 2004, 08:07 AM
Post #18


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 692
Joined: 1-May 03
From: Moclips WA.
Member No.: 640



Steel can look like a liquid...(insert smirk)

John www.ghiaspecialties.com


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
maf914
post Mar 9 2004, 09:42 AM
Post #19


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



QUOTE(John Kelly @ Mar 9 2004, 06:07 AM)
Steel can look like a liquid...(insert smirk)

John www.ghiaspecialties.com

John, I bet the birds in your yard get PO'd when they visit your bird bath! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

I have two bird baths in my backyard that get a lot of bird and squirrel traffic. Takes a bit of maintenance to keep them clean and full of water though. The steel would solve that problem I guess. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
John Kelly
post Mar 9 2004, 12:47 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 692
Joined: 1-May 03
From: Moclips WA.
Member No.: 640



Hi Mike,

I'm going to have to put out a real bird bath too I guess.

John www.ghiaspecialties.com
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th May 2024 - 02:20 AM