QUOTE(Cap'n Krusty @ Nov 2 2010, 05:15 PM)
Does 10-12 Japanese cars a day in a 3 man shop count as "a regular basis"? If not, does being a smog testing facility help? Nissans, like BMWs, seem to be complicated for complication's sake. Toyotas, while reliable, have no soul. Driving a Toyota is like driving a refrigerator, except there's no beer. Like a refrigerator with no beer, they're BORING. Besides that, Toyota trucks and SUVs get the WORST mileage, as a group, of any of the manufacturers building similar vehicles. So much for the touchy-feelie green car company, darling of the NY Times and its leftie following. Honda, on the other hand, has lost its corporate vision. They build cars with no soul, no class, no style, and no redeeming social value. They once were at the cutting edge of the industry, but they, like Toyota, got lost in the search for more profits and less car. They also, like BMW and Nissan, seem to like to do things the hard way ........
No doubt there. Toyota builds appliances now. No debating that. But for the majority of the car buying public, appliances are what they want. Toyota builds cars that sell. Hence the reason they are the largest car company in the world. Dear Honda please stop building cars that suck. Their cars are great, but they are completely souless. Compare the cars HOnda used to make to the current crop of green junk. The old Civics, Integras, CRX, NSX, S2000, etc. Now Honda makes lame ass CRZs. BORING. Honda forgot its roots. Such bummer, but their appliances are some of the most reliable cars on the market.
QUOTE(Cap'n Krusty @ Nov 2 2010, 05:15 PM)
The best engineering in the passenger car industry today, hands down, is coming from VW's Audi Group, and they've got the pedal to the metal. Give it a few years, Toyota needs some time to steal it ...............
I would argue that. BMW does some top drawer engineering as does Porsche. Toyota doesn't engineer anything, they find the least expensive way to produce a top quality product. GM actually has some great engineers, too bad GM gets in their way. But VW/AUDI is radically over complicating the car. Time and again it can be seen when working on their cars. Its a damn shame the drive so nice.
QUOTE(Cap'n Krusty @ Nov 2 2010, 05:15 PM)
As for CELs being lit, ALL OBD 2 cars have CEL issues, because they're ALL required to light up when the CU sees a reason to light it, and the reasons are common for ALL OBD 2 cars. I get several calls a week from people who go through the phone book, looking for someone to "do a diagnostic". As in, my CEL is on, and I need someone to tell me why. Most I turn down, 'cause I don't work on Asian cars. Why? Because I don't know enough about them, and I'm smart enough to admit it.
From what I have seen in the last 15 years VW products by in large have more problems than the other Imports. I am not counting American junk, cuz I know little about it beyond my tow vehicles. Unless it is a brand new VW, most of the ones I have seen and most of the people that tell me they have a VW/Audi, mention the CEL. Its running joke in many places.
QUOTE(Cap'n Krusty @ Nov 2 2010, 05:15 PM)
Maybe Snap-on, MAC, Matco, Mitchell, All Data, and the specialty tool manufacturers make very few diagnostic tools and manuals for European cars, and so many for US and Asian cars because they see the greatest demand from that market segment? Could be ..............
The Cap'n
They go where the money is. I don't blame them for that. Just as you work on VW/Audi products, that is where the money is, sometimes. If the owner wants to pay for it.
But one of my biggest complaints with VW/Audi is, they are such a pain in the ass to work on. I assume you have worked on anything with a 2.7TT engine. S4, RS4, etc. Can you honestly tell me that it is anything but an overengineered POS? Drives great, but God help you if you have to work on it. Why should it pay 30 hours to do a simple engine R&R. That is absurd. 20hours to change turbos? WTF. VW could do so many cool things, but they don't know when to stop either.