falconfp2001
Apr 2 2011, 08:06 PM
I was having problems with the Throttle and my TPS. Way to much slack and the circuit board was grooved.
So I decided to replace.
Here is a a 73 on the left and a 71 on the righ
73 has 5 terminals and the 71 has 4. the 73 also has a different location for the return spring than the 71.
falconfp2001
Apr 2 2011, 08:07 PM
When I popped the covers off you can tell there is a little more thought put into the 73. Technically both switches only use two terminals but which on is the key.
falconfp2001
Apr 2 2011, 08:09 PM
71 now on the left and 73 on the right
falconfp2001
Apr 2 2011, 08:11 PM
You can tell that the 73 TPS is more serviceable. I was stunned by how clean it looked.
falconfp2001
Apr 2 2011, 08:16 PM
Here is a shot of the bottom of the 73 TPS. You can see it is numbered according to the schematic. 14 is not used but 9 and 20 are. IF you are using a 4 pin connector from an early FI harness. connect from 9 over and it should be fine.
falconfp2001
Apr 2 2011, 08:19 PM
Heres a shot of the TPS connected. You can make out the numbers from this side as well. Remember, 14 is not used.
falconfp2001
Apr 2 2011, 08:25 PM
Test drive with the 73 TPS was a success. Seems to have more acceleration and definately steady when partial load is on gas.
The Slack in the 73 TPS throttle body shaft and butterfly was almost non-existent.
I was told that the serrations on the boards are different but I surmised that the serrations were for extra pulses during acceleration and not for any value for the ECU.
Operation is smooth and now I'm gonna find me a back up for the future.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.