Folks,

Dunno what exactly happened. I left the bbs up on my screen for most of the day. I refreshed occasionally as I took breaks in the day. I posted occasionally. Later in the day, I posted and it insisted that I "log on". Oh oh. To make a long story short, I got into a cycle that could only be broken by asking for a new password. I appear to be successfully back, although we'll see as I try to post this:-)

I can provide answers to specific questions as always.

kim.

I've had problems with the 'log on' also!

I've had a few issues too.

I've got the same issues.

So it happened again this morning from the "quick logon" feature. However, I can log in just fine from the top of the page tho.

kim.

Hmmm... haven't had any trouble loggin in
(not since we're on this server anyway)
We will look into it...

Cheers,

Jeroen

I got an error signing up, forgot what it said, but it still allowed me to log in.

I need to turn on the error logging feature. I'll address them as fast as I can. These are minor compared to what we where finding..LOL


B

The user timeout was set to 3600 seconds. I changed it too 9999999. This will allow you to stay signed in.

When you guy's post a problem (I used to say Ya'll) tell me what OS your running. I know KRK is on Linux. This will help me debug the BBS faster.

B

Good points Brad.

rhat linux 7.3, Mozilla 1.0.3

I can now only sign in with the quick one. If I sign in from the top of the page, I end up in an endless cycle of sign in, thankyou, but you end up not signed in.

krk.

My problems went away today. I'm using Windows 2000 and Crazy Browser 1.0.5.

Mark . . . did you get it fixed?

Nope! No one's heard from Mark since 2002. nice one Mike! The zombie apocalypse is upon us!

Holy crap. This is like the thread of people who disappeared.

Mysterious, isn't it? First they have log-in "issues" and then . . . .


I'm worried aboot Mr. Henry. He has one of my engines.

This is a who-is-who of who isn't here anymore!

...if it had included some MikeZ posts, it would have been more nostalgic

I went to the oldest garage post I could find (one that hasn't been moved) and made a reply.

You see, a few of us are trying to illustrate to a member where the beginning or 'start' of something is versus the 'end' of something.

This member argues that the posts in the garage start at the top of page one with the most recent posting. However, a few of us counter that in fact the true "start" in the 914World Garage is some 1700+ pages ago back at the end of '02.

This member has chosen to disagree with this and has resorted to name calling.

As an example: if I was to say, "The Club site isn't getting much traffic - page 1 starts back on November 29!?!!"

. . . he argues that would mean the top post of page 1 would be dated November 29.

It's not a good situation. Ve-e-erry tense.

Speaking of the oldest threads that are still in existence, here they are in order:

Thread 5 by krk:
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=5

Thread 7 by Gint:
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=7

Thread 8 by Mark Henry:
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=8

And thread 8 is still nailed on top of the first page of the garage after 10 years!

But you know for a fact that he is "mentally challenged" (or as they say in French Canadian speak; a Rè-tard). Do you think this will really help?

stupid Canadians

Not really. But it was worth a shot.

Oh, I see.

Back with the name calling.