Eddie914
Sep 13 2004, 03:38 PM
Chassis: 1973 914 1.7
Engine: 1977 2.7 liter 6 cylinder
Transmission: 197? 914 sideshifter
Suspension (f): 911 front hubs with Koni struts and Weltmeister sway bar.
Suspension ®: OEM hubs drilled for 5 lug with Koni shocks
Brakes: 1979 911SC iron calipers/rotors
Rear tires: 245/45/16 Yokohama a032r on BBS RA 16 x 8 et11
Front tires: 225/50/16 Yokohama a032r on Fakes 16 x 7 et23
Induction: Weber 40IDA3C with K&N Watershield air filters
Cooling: Front mounted cooler with Mark Stephens oil tank (battery tray mount)
Safety: Autopower rollbar, TRW Sabelt 5 pt harnesses, OMP driver seat, ? passenger seat
Bodywork: fiberglass bumpers, fenders, hood, and rear deck
Fuel tank: OEM less header tank
Exhaust: Bursch muffler with 1 5/8” headers of unknown origin
Interior: Stock except removal of carpets, backpad, console, & doorpanels
Thanks
iiibdsiil
Sep 13 2004, 03:47 PM
What do we weigh bone stock?
machina
Sep 13 2004, 03:53 PM
fg bodywork cancels out extra weight of six,
rollbar but not full cage,
I'm guessing still has glass windows...
1 ton
dr
Eddie914
Sep 13 2004, 03:55 PM
still has glass windows, 3/4 tank of fuel and 14 quarts of 20W50
TimT
Sep 13 2004, 03:56 PM
2200 plus or minus a coupla pounds
I just corner balanced my 914 w 3.2/six
its a pig, weighs 2254
time to make it light!!! lighter is faster!!
machina
Sep 13 2004, 04:06 PM
QUOTE(Eddie914 @ Sep 13 2004, 05:55 PM)
still has glass windows, 3/4 tank of fuel and 14 quarts of 20W50
eddie,
do you know what it really weighs? are you testing us?
Now I really want to know.
My car weighs 1900 with full cage and metal bodywork.
dr
jPs
Sep 13 2004, 04:20 PM
QUOTE(Eddie914 @ Sep 13 2004, 01:55 PM)
still has glass windows, 3/4 tank of fuel and 14 quarts of 20W50
Full of wiper fluid?
d914
Sep 13 2004, 04:22 PM
mine with a 2.5 six, windows, cage, full tank and me 2400. I gotta loose weight. car has since loss weight, I havent.... <_<
brant
Sep 13 2004, 04:44 PM
I would guess the 2200 (+/- 50)...
but I'd love to actually find out the real number...
let us know would you.
brant
Eddie914
Sep 13 2004, 05:23 PM
2080 LBS
920 LBS Front - 44%
1160 lbs Rear - 56%
Andyrew
Sep 13 2004, 05:31 PM
Wowza! How in the world did you do that?
Thats alot of weight loss.... Good job!
TimT
Sep 13 2004, 05:37 PM
My tub is a '75..... maybe, like with the 911's the early tubs are lighter
The p/o of my car told me it weighed a touch over 2000, however, on the scales I use it weighs a touch over 2200.. Ive corner balanced it twice since Ive owned it, using the same scles... and it consistently weighs the same (plus minus a few lbs for fluids)
I wonder how 2 sets of Longacre, or Intercomp scales compare? Ive been at a club race where stock guys were screaming because the scruts scales didnt read the same as the scales their set-up guys used..
redshift
Sep 13 2004, 05:57 PM
I am so glad this thread isn't abnout someone's penis.
M
Eddie914
Sep 13 2004, 06:14 PM
Must be pretty serious about weigh reduction to consider removing that to save a few ounces.
I know Colin Chapman of Lotus was a fanatic about weight reduction but I don't think he ever asked that much of his drivers!
machina
Sep 13 2004, 06:19 PM
QUOTE(Eddie914 @ Sep 13 2004, 07:23 PM)
2080 LBS
920 LBS Front - 44%
1160 lbs Rear - 56%
I guessed the closest,
what do I win?
dr
lapuwali
Sep 13 2004, 06:39 PM
QUOTE
My tub is a '75..... maybe, like with the 911's the early tubs are lighter
The '75-'76 is the heaviest car, by a good margin. The '70-'71 cars are a lot lighter. No side-impact beams in the doors, no reinforcement for the 5mph bumpers. Maybe other things, too. Certainly a lot less sound insulation. Less than 2100lbs with a Six is pretty good.
TimT
Sep 13 2004, 06:43 PM
Heh, my doors are getting a makeover soon.. I have the doorskins Paul made fro me ready to install...
Just a few more track days left
3liter914-6
Sep 14 2004, 12:29 AM
QUOTE(lapuwali @ Sep 13 2004, 08:39 PM)
QUOTE
My tub is a '75..... maybe, like with the 911's the early tubs are lighter
The '75-'76 is the heaviest car, by a good margin. The '70-'71 cars are a lot lighter. No side-impact beams in the doors, no reinforcement for the 5mph bumpers. Maybe other things, too. Certainly a lot less sound insulation. Less than 2100lbs with a Six is pretty good.
Yeah, that's really good. My '70 914-6 weighed 2200lbs according to the CAT scales back when it was still a 3.0 with the 40IDTs. That's with FG bumpers. FM Oil cooler, but everything else stock (weight wise at least). How much weight does getting the trunks done in FG save? 30lbs a piece? more?
brant
Sep 14 2004, 08:43 AM
Good job Eddie,
thats a good weight and encouraging to hear.
-how much do you think the FG fenders save?
-Are the FG fenders both front and rear?
(must be for those big tires)
-do you still have the front fresh air ventilation system,
wiring, and headlights?
thanks for your time!
brant
lapuwali
Sep 14 2004, 08:43 AM
As I recall, each trunk lid was about 30lbs, and the FG replacements I had five years ago were about 10lbs each. Figure 40lbs overall, maybe more if you use very lightweight bits.
Eddie914
Sep 14 2004, 09:50 AM
The front fenders are attached with Dzus fasteners. I cut away all the OEM fenders with a plasma cutter.
The hood and deck are very light. Made from coremat with no internal frame. No hinges, only mounting clips and hood pins.
I use the original fog lights as headlights (a handful of fireflies in a pickle jar might be brighter). OEM headlights are gone but I have not removed the buckets yet.
I still have the fresh air system with fan. Very nice to have here is rainy Seattle
The rear fenders are FG bonded on to the original steel by the prior owner. Nicely done but a lot more steel could have been cut away.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.