QUOTE(carr914 @ Apr 9 2012, 07:37 PM)
But to argue your Belt theory, think about that a Stock set of belts are now 40 Years Old.
I think in SCCA, you can't have Belts that are over 5 years old
You cannot have
AFTERMARKET belts (harnesses) that are over 5 years old. You can have
FACTORY belts that are as old as the car. (Or older.) Done primarily for liability; the assumption is that the OEMs did enough research to ensure that the stock belts are good enough for a reasonable impact.
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Apr 9 2012, 09:13 PM)
Last time i checked, the Jetta metal is just as hard as the 914 metal.
How in the world is it safer to have a factory metal beam 3" from my head than a aftermarket metal beam 5" from my head
Maybe your case is different; at least JP and I would have a beam much closer than 3" from our heads in our cars.
The point, however, is that the Jetta was designed so that people would have reasonable odds of surviving a collision, even when their heads are 3" from that beam. Perhaps the beam is designed to crumple out of the way, or perhaps the belts are designed to keep you from going that direction, or perhaps something else is supposed to keep you from hitting that beam. The seatbelts and cockpit structures are (in theory at least!) designed as a complete system. Making ad-hoc changes to that system can result in Very Bad Things happening.
If you want to keep arguing that your 914 is safer for you than your Jetta is, you can keep talking. But it doesn't change the fact that full roll cages in street-driven cars are generally a Very Bad Idea. In the general case, for most people and most cars.
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Apr 10 2012, 10:18 AM)
My point being, the side part of a roll cage is no worse that the top of a roof or door in a normal passenger car. Hitting your head on metal hurts.
Hurts, yup. But hitting your head on a large flat piece of metal is not as likely to shatter your skull as hitting it on a 2" diameter tube. It wouldn't be fun, but you're less likely to become a corpse due to it.
--DD