Cevan
May 23 2012, 03:37 PM
Hopefully this helps those who felt dissed by the Jalopnik article.
Click to view attachment
jsayre914
May 23 2012, 03:40 PM
SirAndy
May 23 2012, 04:52 PM
It's missing the targa bar ???
jsayre914
May 23 2012, 04:56 PM
QUOTE(SirAndy @ May 23 2012, 06:52 PM)
It's missing the targa bar ???
reflection from the camera i think
hot_shoe914
May 23 2012, 05:41 PM
Looks like they shopped it out.
SirAndy
May 23 2012, 06:09 PM
QUOTE(hot_shoe914 @ May 23 2012, 04:41 PM)
Looks like they shopped it out.
Looks like someone photo-shopped out the targa top and also removed the top of the bar with it ...
biosurfer1
May 23 2012, 07:22 PM
I think its just a bend in the cover and the reflection for the camera flash
tod914
May 23 2012, 07:30 PM
Maybe they photoshoped it out to remove the top, to show it's removable. Will definetly grab that issue.
Cevan
May 23 2012, 07:48 PM
The targa bar is there. Musta been the reflection.
Pat Garvey
Jun 3 2012, 03:58 PM
They left out the World as a source.
I'll email them about that.
How many mebers do we have these days?
bulitt
Jun 3 2012, 04:27 PM
according to the bottom of the "forums" index page - 13259 members.
bigkensteele
Jun 3 2012, 06:48 PM
Unfortunately, the article contains several inaccuracies. That is the one gripe I have with the magazine - they would rather spend more time waxing poetic than researching the story.
jim_hoyland
Jun 3 2012, 08:16 PM
Who's car ?
lotus_65
Jun 3 2012, 08:46 PM
QUOTE(jsayre914 @ May 23 2012, 04:40 PM)
abnrdo
Jun 3 2012, 11:23 PM
Neat!
6freak
Jun 4 2012, 07:37 AM
QUOTE(jsayre914 @ May 23 2012, 03:56 PM)
QUOTE(SirAndy @ May 23 2012, 06:52 PM)
It's missing the targa bar ???
reflection from the camera i think
yup....i zoomed in ...its there!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.