With the trans cooler:
I'm getting 220 degree's after 20 minute vintage race with a 2liter on an 80 degree day at coronado island/sea level
(I also ran at hallet, oklahoma which is 900ft above sea level. I still ran 220 on an 80degree ambient day)
imagine what I was getting before the cooler at the event I blew the trans up last july. It was a 110 degree day and we had 2 drivers on the car that day, running back to back sessions at 5000ft of elevation where the air is less dense and cooling less efficient by far...
I didn't have a gauge on it then, but I'm guessing 260f or more is the norm without a cooler (in a 20 minute session with a tiny 2.0 motor)
I also would theorize that lower gears, smaller diameter wheels, more rpm and definitely a clutch limited slip differential would add to the heat problem if a person has any of those contributing factors.
putting a gauge on the tranny is a real eye opener... no wonder everyone has always said the 901 couldn't handle high hp. I still believe its a 250hp tranny but that keeping oil temps in check is mandatory just like you would for a motor.
for example, you don't hear people recommending to skip front coolers on race cars or that its a waste of time to install an oil temp gauge for an air cooled motor.
brant
QUOTE(naro914 @ Nov 9 2012, 03:19 AM)
QUOTE(larryM @ Nov 8 2012, 11:35 PM)
but - WHY ??
it makes sense for a 24-hrs enduro World Makes Championship run in 1970-72
but vintage racing today is only about 15-20 minutes on track
so why bother -??
(yep - i know - i BTDT - old age now questions the folly of my youthful fevers)
.
Are you asking "why bother with trans cooling"?
Agreed, if you're running stock engine, wheels, etc. probably no need.
But I'm pushing 330 +/- hp with the stress of 12" wide slicks through a basically stock 901 trans that was build with about 100 hp in mind back in the day... THAT'S why.
Plus, PCA enduro races are 90 minutes.