QUOTE(J P Stein @ Mar 31 2013, 07:18 AM)
At what point does "gathering data" become an end in its self rather than a means to an end?
Our "butt dyno" served us well and fit in well with the TM&E factor.
I can't give ya'll a print out of data nor even event results. I don't think my shocks were perfect.....but close enuff to keep us towards the pointy end of the field.
Brit now has a data collection system on the car (not cheep) and it ain't gonna help him a bit with a shreaded 901. The butt dyno was saying " how long can this tranny last?" The data came in a couple weeks ago. I'm sure that the data collection will point him to exactly what trans (& ratios) to put back in there.
For me, I learned more in my first two days of using data than I had in the previous 5 years of driving. The more you use data with different people, you quickly realize that perception often does not match reality and you get much better feedback from the data system. You can also see a lot of trends and problems that would never show up with the butt dyno.
So, I'm using data as a tool. These sensors will help confirm what I'm feeling out of the shocks, then we will be able to take the data collected, have the shocks dynoed, and figure out new valving based on the facts of our car, not what someone else says works well based on their hunch.
For pro guys like NASCAR, ALMS, F!, etc they use the data collection to verify their simulations. The actual car testing is only maybe 10% of what they want. They are far more interested in figuring how to make their models match the actual car so they can figure things out quicker and cheaper than real world testing.