Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: D-jet troubleshooting
914World.com > The 914 Forums > 914World Garage
saigon71
My 1974 2.0 D-jet is running very strong, but there were two lingering issues with the FI that I wanted to address over the winter:

1. A severe idle "hunt." The engine would rush up to about 1200 RPM, then nearly stall...repeat cycle.

2. Every once in a while the car would buck, most notably at highway speeds...it wasn't bad, just annoying.

Last week I installed a new circuit board in the TPS purchased from Dave Sprinkle a few years back. It was calibrated according to the Pelican tech article using an ohmmeter.

I took a 210 mile road trip over the weekend to test things out. The car now idles perfectly through the entire warm-up sequence. Thanks Dave! beerchug.gif

The problem is that I still have the same bucking issue. All my research points to the TPS. Any suggestions on what to check next?
914_teener
Fuel pressure.
mepstein
I had a bucking issue. sometimes bad, sometimes not. All new fuel and vacuum lines, cleaned injectors, new seals, ect. Checked mps, tps and fuel pressure. Plugs, wires, and rebuilt dizzy. Even installed a different engine wire harness. Finally went away with a different (used) coil. Maybe the coil was the fix, maybe not but it hasn't bucked since.
boxsterfan
My car has the "idle hunt" problem on warmup. But once warmed up, the idle is perfect at 900-950RPM.

I thought the "idle hunt" during warm-up was related to bad CHT sensor? $16 part.
watsonrx13
I have a '74 2.0 D-jet also. My runs very well but also has a similar bucking/hesitation at 2900-3100 RPM. When I have the gas pedal set at the 3000 RPM range, then slightly reduce, it bucks/hesitate. Once past 2900 it evens out.

I have replaced the TPS circuit board from Dave, new vacuum and fuel hoses, professionally rebuilt FI. Tested TPS, MPS, new fuel pump, plugs and wires. Newly rebuilt 2056 with Raby cam kit for FI engine.

My sentiments exactly: "Every once in a while the car would buck, most notably at highway speeds...it wasn't bad, just annoying."

I too am looking for a solution to this annoying problem.

--- Rob
saigon71
QUOTE(boxsterfan @ Mar 16 2014, 11:17 PM) *

My car has the "idle hunt" problem on warmup. But once warmed up, the idle is perfect at 900-950RPM.

I thought the "idle hunt" during warm-up was related to bad CHT sensor? $16 part.


I always related idle hunt to the CHT as well, so I installed a new CHT and it made no difference. The new TPS board fixed the problem for me.
DRPHIL914
QUOTE(watsonrx13 @ Mar 17 2014, 08:04 AM) *

I have a '74 2.0 D-jet also. My runs very well but also has a similar bucking/hesitation at 2900-3100 RPM. When I have the gas pedal set at the 3000 RPM range, then slightly reduce, it bucks/hesitate. Once past 2900 it evens out.

I have replaced the TPS circuit board from Dave, new vacuum and fuel hoses, professionally rebuilt FI. Tested TPS, MPS, new fuel pump, plugs and wires. Newly rebuilt 2056 with Raby cam kit for FI engine.

My sentiments exactly: "Every once in a while the car would buck, most notably at highway speeds...it wasn't bad, just annoying."

I too am looking for a solution to this annoying problem.

--- Rob


try disconnecting the air intake temp sensor, see if that makes a difference.- I too had this at one time, but once i changed out the TPS circuit board, it was gone, but recently someone else had stated that in addition to a surging problem the bucking was improved by disconnecting the air temp sensor.
Logically the most obvious causes would be TPS, but if warming up partly improves it then maybe its an issue with the CHT, - just to play with this a bit, i put a potentiometer in line with the cht, and did see this clear up when i hit the right amount of resistance, also got rid of the lean running that causes idle hunting- but the real problem is either the CHT or the MPS which are not set correctly to have the proper A/F mix. ---
larss
QUOTE(saigon71 @ Mar 16 2014, 11:06 PM) *

My 1974 2.0 D-jet is running very strong, but there were two lingering issues with the FI that I wanted to address over the winter:

1. A severe idle "hunt." The engine would rush up to about 1200 RPM, then nearly stall...repeat cycle.

....


I also got this cycling after putting 1911cc together, worst during warm up. I found that if I put an extra 50 to 100 Ohms in serial with the 270 Ohm ballast resistor for the CHT sensor, the cycling was almost eliminated. The extra resistance makes the engine run somewhat richer (the CPU Believes the Engine is colder than what it is).

/Lars S
DRPHIL914
QUOTE(larss @ Mar 17 2014, 08:32 AM) *

QUOTE(saigon71 @ Mar 16 2014, 11:06 PM) *

My 1974 2.0 D-jet is running very strong, but there were two lingering issues with the FI that I wanted to address over the winter:

1. A severe idle "hunt." The engine would rush up to about 1200 RPM, then nearly stall...repeat cycle.

....


I also got this cycling after putting 1911cc together, worst during warm up. I found that if I put an extra 50 to 100 Ohms in serial with the 270 Ohm ballast resistor for the CHT sensor, the cycling was almost eliminated. The extra resistance makes the engine run somewhat richer (the CPU Believes the Engine is colder than what it is).

/Lars S

- agree.gif -exactly, i used the pot. to get the resistance that worked and then removed it and put the fixed resistance in like Lars did..
r_towle
QUOTE(saigon71 @ Mar 16 2014, 06:06 PM) *

My 1974 2.0 D-jet is running very strong, but there were two lingering issues with the FI that I wanted to address over the winter:

1. A severe idle "hunt." The engine would rush up to about 1200 RPM, then nearly stall...repeat cycle.

2. Every once in a while the car would buck, most notably at highway speeds...it wasn't bad, just annoying.

Last week I installed a new circuit board in the TPS purchased from Dave Sprinkle a few years back. It was calibrated according to the Pelican tech article using an ohmmeter.

I took a 210 mile road trip over the weekend to test things out. The car now idles perfectly through the entire warm-up sequence. Thanks Dave! beerchug.gif

The problem is that I still have the same bucking issue. All my research points to the TPS. Any suggestions on what to check next?


Clean your distributor ever?
plas76targa
Bob,
i get the same bucking issues. It's usually the worst if i try to take off without a good warm-up period. My car also sometimes cuts completely out at cruising speed. Most annoying!
I just installed a new coil per mepsteins suggestion which didn't improve the problem. The four wires going to the Dizzy are all soft insulation and look poor in quality and supplier support. I plan on replacing those too.

Good luck and hope you find the solution soon!
jsayre914
Bob,

I fixed this issue by removing the trigger points from the dizzy and cleaning them. Give it a try. I am not sure if they are available new (I couldnt find any) but if you find a new set, Get one for me too. beerchug.gif


Good Luck!
brant
QUOTE(Philip W. @ Mar 17 2014, 06:25 AM) *

QUOTE(watsonrx13 @ Mar 17 2014, 08:04 AM) *

I have a '74 2.0 D-jet also. My runs very well but also has a similar bucking/hesitation at 2900-3100 RPM. When I have the gas pedal set at the 3000 RPM range, then slightly reduce, it bucks/hesitate. Once past 2900 it evens out.

I have replaced the TPS circuit board from Dave, new vacuum and fuel hoses, professionally rebuilt FI. Tested TPS, MPS, new fuel pump, plugs and wires. Newly rebuilt 2056 with Raby cam kit for FI engine.

My sentiments exactly: "Every once in a while the car would buck, most notably at highway speeds...it wasn't bad, just annoying."

I too am looking for a solution to this annoying problem.

--- Rob


try disconnecting the air intake temp sensor, see if that makes a difference.- I too had this at one time, but once i changed out the TPS circuit board, it was gone, but recently someone else had stated that in addition to a surging problem the bucking was improved by disconnecting the air temp sensor.
Logically the most obvious causes would be TPS, but if warming up partly improves it then maybe its an issue with the CHT, - just to play with this a bit, i put a potentiometer in line with the cht, and did see this clear up when i hit the right amount of resistance, also got rid of the lean running that causes idle hunting- but the real problem is either the CHT or the MPS which are not set correctly to have the proper A/F mix. ---


To both of you who richened the mixture by enrich ending the cht. Did either of you verify your mixtures with a wide band? The reason I ask a that my mps is already adjusted with a wide band and I'm not going lean on the mixture. Yet I too have the exact occasional 3000-ish highway sporadic buck.

I'll try the coil and trigger points next. Not sure what is causing this
larss
QUOTE(brant @ Mar 17 2014, 10:22 PM) *



To both of you who richened the mixture by enrich ending the cht. Did either of you verify your mixtures with a wide band? The reason I ask a that my mps is already adjusted with a wide band and I'm not going lean on the mixture. Yet I too have the exact occasional 3000-ish highway sporadic buck.

I'll try the coil and trigger points next. Not sure what is causing this


I only have a narrow band AF sensor on mine (yes I know I can't at all compare it with a wide band).
Before adding the extra resistor to the CHT the reading cycled at Optimal, after adding the Ohms it was more steady at Rich but not bottomed out. I did the adjustment during warm up since it was there the big problem was, have not yet fully checked what the reading is when fully warmed up.
I did not use the gauge to adjust - I adjusted the resistance in small steps until the cyling in rpm (almost) went out.


/Lars S



/Lars S
davesprinkle
The interdigitated traces (love that word, I found it on pbanders site, every djet owner should read it: http://members.rennlist.com/pbanders/) on the TPS board are designed to act as little triggers for for an extra 'shot' of fuel. Similar intent to the accelerator pump on a holley.

The TPS wiper scrubs across these serrated traces and shorts alternately between two contacts. If this action doesn't happen, in other words, if the throttle moves WITHOUT generating these alternating connections, then the engine may momentarily go lean on a slight throttle tip-in and can result in the famous djet 'buck'. (Other problems can result in this behavior, but in most cases this is due to a problem with the TPS.)

I need to be careful to state that this should be viewed as a 'system' problem, and not as a TPS board problem. The TPS board is one part in the system, but there are others: the wiper where it contacts the boards, the leaf-contacts in the wiper stem, the connector contacts, the wiring harness, the contacts at the ECU. All of these things need to be healthy or you can get this problem: throttle movement without accel trigger.

In many cases, as djet guys know, the replacement board resolves the issue. This is fortunate, because the board seems to be the most prominent failure point in this accel enrichment system. It's also fairly cheap and easy to replace. But if simple board replacement still leaves you with the problem, then you'll need to confirm that ALL of the accel system still works.

The easiest way to do this is to switch on the ignition (don't start the car), and while being very quiet, listen for injector clicks as you slowly open the throttle. (Lean into the open engine bay for this. Put your ear as close to an injector as possible. And turn off the Motorhead, for cryin out loud, Lemmy's not gonna help you hear the damn thing.)

Another way to do this is to probe between the appropriate contacts AT THE ECU with a continuity buzzer or an LED that you rig up. You need to confirm the alternating connection as you move the throttle or you've got another problem than just the board.

By the way, all these wiring harnesses are unreliable. They've spent their life (40 years now) exposed to heat and hydrocarbon vapor and vibration. They're junk. Get a new one.
DRPHIL914
I have a new wide band installed and will be testing this soon.
As for the suggestion about the harness, I agree and replaced this with a new one from Jeff B. Also have a new tps board from you, Dave. I would suggest also cleaning or replacing the injectortriggers. I did this too. It will be interesting to get the car off jackstands so I can test the A/F meter and see where the mixture is with those adjustments. ?

QUOTE(brant @ Mar 17 2014, 05:22 PM) *

QUOTE(Philip W. @ Mar 17 2014, 06:25 AM) *

QUOTE(watsonrx13 @ Mar 17 2014, 08:04 AM) *

I have a '74 2.0 D-jet also. My runs very well but also has a similar bucking/hesitation at 2900-3100 RPM. When I have the gas pedal set at the 3000 RPM range, then slightly reduce, it bucks/hesitate. Once past 2900 it evens out.

I have replaced the TPS circuit board from Dave, new vacuum and fuel hoses, professionally rebuilt FI. Tested TPS, MPS, new fuel pump, plugs and wires. Newly rebuilt 2056 with Raby cam kit for FI engine.

My sentiments exactly: "Every once in a while the car would buck, most notably at highway speeds...it wasn't bad, just annoying."

I too am looking for a solution to this annoying problem.

--- Rob


try disconnecting the air intake temp sensor, see if that makes a difference.- I too had this at one time, but once i changed out the TPS circuit board, it was gone, but recently someone else had stated that in addition to a surging problem the bucking was improved by disconnecting the air temp sensor.
Logically the most obvious causes would be TPS, but if warming up partly improves it then maybe its an issue with the CHT, - just to play with this a bit, i put a potentiometer in line with the cht, and did see this clear up when i hit the right amount of resistance, also got rid of the lean running that causes idle hunting- but the real problem is either the CHT or the MPS which are not set correctly to have the proper A/F mix. ---


To both of you who richened the mixture by enrich ending the cht. Did either of you verify your mixtures with a wide band? The reason I ask a that my mps is already adjusted with a wide band and I'm not going lean on the mixture. Yet I too have the exact occasional 3000-ish highway sporadic buck.

I'll try the coil and trigger points next. Not sure what is causing this
saigon71
QUOTE(davesprinkle @ Mar 18 2014, 09:44 PM) *

The interdigitated traces (love that word, I found it on pbanders site, every djet owner should read it: http://members.rennlist.com/pbanders/) on the TPS board are designed to act as little triggers for for an extra 'shot' of fuel. Similar intent to the accelerator pump on a holley.

The TPS wiper scrubs across these serrated traces and shorts alternately between two contacts. If this action doesn't happen, in other words, if the throttle moves WITHOUT generating these alternating connections, then the engine may momentarily go lean on a slight throttle tip-in and can result in the famous djet 'buck'. (Other problems can result in this behavior, but in most cases this is due to a problem with the TPS.)

I need to be careful to state that this should be viewed as a 'system' problem, and not as a TPS board problem. The TPS board is one part in the system, but there are others: the wiper where it contacts the boards, the leaf-contacts in the wiper stem, the connector contacts, the wiring harness, the contacts at the ECU. All of these things need to be healthy or you can get this problem: throttle movement without accel trigger.

In many cases, as djet guys know, the replacement board resolves the issue. This is fortunate, because the board seems to be the most prominent failure point in this accel enrichment system. It's also fairly cheap and easy to replace. But if simple board replacement still leaves you with the problem, then you'll need to confirm that ALL of the accel system still works.

The easiest way to do this is to switch on the ignition (don't start the car), and while being very quiet, listen for injector clicks as you slowly open the throttle. (Lean into the open engine bay for this. Put your ear as close to an injector as possible. And turn off the Motorhead, for cryin out loud, Lemmy's not gonna help you hear the damn thing.)

Another way to do this is to probe between the appropriate contacts AT THE ECU with a continuity buzzer or an LED that you rig up. You need to confirm the alternating connection as you move the throttle or you've got another problem than just the board.

By the way, all these wiring harnesses are unreliable. They've spent their life (40 years now) exposed to heat and hydrocarbon vapor and vibration. They're junk. Get a new one.


Thanks for all the info Dave.

It started to rain early today so I couldn't get out to test the new coil I installed last night.

I appreciate all the suggestions on what to check next. I will post what the fix is as it seems a number of us have this problem.

The distributor has never been cleaned.





watsonrx13
Thanks for all of the suggestions. I'm going to remove the air intake temp sensor wire first and test this weekend. What is the recommended coil, the regular Bosch blue or a Petronix Flame-Thrower? BTW I have points in mine. New points, condenser and gapped correctly. Timing and valves recently adjusted.

Also, I've already cleaned the trigger points.

--- Rob
watsonrx13
I finally purchased and installed a new Bosch 'Blue' coil on the car and tested it. It ran the same, i.e. I still have the hesitation after holding the throttle at 3000 RPM, then easing off.

I also removed the wire from the air temp sensor and drove the car. With the wire disconnected the car wouldn't idle and it continued to hesitate at 3000 rpm. Here's the wire I disconnected and the temp sensor. If this is not the correct sensor, can someone upload a pic showing the correct one?

Click to view attachment

--- Rob
914itis
Bob,
Some may remember my long thread after installing my 2.0 djet bucking at 3300 rpm.
After months and tons if money changing injectors ,tps ecu, vaccum lines trotle body and gasket, the issue was a $100 fix.

It was the vacuum advanced on the dizzy getting stuck. I replaced it and that was it.

I know it could be a number of things as stated in your thread, but you can do a simple test by sucking air out of the tubes and see if the arm moves.

Give it a try
Here is the thread Buckling at 3300
914_teener
QUOTE(914itis @ Apr 21 2014, 11:46 AM) *

Bob,
Some may remember my long thread after installing my 2.0 djet bucking at 3300 rpm.
After months and tons if money changing injectors ,tps ecu, vaccum lines trotle body and gasket, the issue was a $100 fix.

It was the vacuum advanced on the dizzy getting stuck. I replaced it and that was it.

I know it could be a number of things as stated in your thread, but you can do a simple test by sucking air out of the tubes and see if the arm moves.

Give it a try
Here is the thread Buckling at 3300



Yep.....and testing the vac at the can....it has been suggested a couple of times.
zymurgist
Wow, good info in the linked thread. Mine is doing this too. Distributor is fine, though, I just had it apart and lubed everything and made sure the advance plates and can were all in working order.
luskesq
Timing (and it wasn't off by much) caused my issue as well as a defective vacuum advance (wouldn't hold a vacuum for long).

Keith
watsonrx13
Well finally had a chance to check the vacuum advance on the distributor.

Here are the steps I took (photos to follow).

1. Removed distributor cap
2. Disconnected the vacuum hose
3. Hookup up a vacuum gauge (hand pump to bleed brakes) to vacuum advance on distributor
4. Pump up the vacuum and checked movement of arm.
5. No movement on arm
6. Hookup vacuum gauge on other line
7. Pump up vacuum and noticed movement on arm
8. Reconnected vacuum line to other side of vacuum advance (using a hose clamp)
9. Test drove car

Conclusion: the car didn't sputter, but now the idle is around 1600 RPM, before was 900 RPM.

So is this a good solution?
If this is a good solution I'll readjust the idle.

Vacuum pump hooked up to first vacuum line
Click to view attachment

Close up of connection of vacuum pump
Click to view attachment

Vacuum hose hookup to second vacuum line with extra hose clamp
Click to view attachment

Wide shot of distributor/vacuum hose connection
Click to view attachment

Vacuum pump set up
Click to view attachment

Vacuum pump kit
Click to view attachment


r_towle
The distributor has never been cleaned...well it's 40 years old and it may be time to relive the advance plates...

Cost is about 5 cents of grease and some time.

Rich
type47
I checked the vacuum advance on a distributor on a project motor and was surprised at how little the plate moved with vacuum applied. Anybody have an estimate/comment about the amt of movement?
r_towle
QUOTE(type47 @ May 10 2014, 12:51 PM) *

I checked the vacuum advance on a distributor on a project motor and was surprised at how little the plate moved with vacuum applied. Anybody have an estimate/comment about the amt of movement?

Depends upon the distributor.

Rich
watsonrx13
QUOTE(r_towle @ May 10 2014, 11:45 AM) *

The distributor has never been cleaned...well it's 40 years old and it may be time to relive the advance plates...

Cost is about 5 cents of grease and some time.

Rich


Rich I think you missed my point. When I checked the second vacuum line on the vacuum advance, the arm DID move.
My question is: 'Is it OK to use either vacuum line on either side of the vacuum advance?'

--- Rob
TheCabinetmaker
One port is advance, the other is retard.
boxsterfan
I think your vacuum line (as pictured) is hooked up to the wrong port on the cannister for a 74 2.0L. Mine is hooked to the other port on the cannister. And the port you are hooked to is left open (mine has a short 3-4" piece of rubber hose on it connecting to nothing). Some cars had a connection on the plenum for that side of the cannister.
r_towle
Yup, one is advance, one is retard.
Retard was left up capped and floating in the atmosphere on stock cars.

Also I think some parts swapping was going on because in order for it to work properly, you would need a throttle body that has one vacuum port in front of and one port behind the throttle plate.

Not every car has the right throttle body and not every distributor has both ports for retard and advance.

Mixed results in the car I tuned that had everything required.
It would slam back to idle between shifts....
watsonrx13
Rich thanks for the reply, that explains everything.

--- Rob
type47
QUOTE(r_towle @ May 10 2014, 08:52 AM) *

QUOTE(type47 @ May 10 2014, 12:51 PM) *

I checked the vacuum advance on a distributor on a project motor and was surprised at how little the plate moved with vacuum applied. Anybody have an estimate/comment about the amt of movement?

Depends upon the distributor.

Rich


039.xxx.??? but it's a 2L distributor...
TheCabinetmaker
Where does the hose with the clamp go to? It's headed the wrong direction. That hose is to too big also.
914_teener
I really think you should yank that dizzy out and make sure the the little ball for which the advance plate rides is clean and moving fully....if you haven't already.

My .02...just from the look of it.

watsonrx13
Thanks for everyone's suggestions. I have pulled the distributor and removed the vacuum advance. I visually checked the arm and it looks clean. I also manually was able to move it. I hooked up a vacuum gauge to the advance port and nothing moved nor did it hold vacuum. I hooked up to the retard port and was able to get vacuum and movement.

At this point I'm assuming the advance side isn't working and I've placed an ad for a2.0l vacuum advance.

Once I've replaced the vacuum advance I'll reinstall the distributor, hook up the vacuum hose and test the car again.

Also someone commented about the vacuum hose not routed correctly, I've included a photo of where the hose is connected to the plenum.

Stay tuned for more updates.

Vacuum advance, advance side where arm comes out.
Click to view attachment

Distributor (039 905 205A) with vacuum advance removed. The advance is removed by removing the circlip from the distributor and (2) screws.
Click to view attachment

Distributor removed. The distributor is easily removed by removing the wires to the FI trigger and coil and unbolting the mounting nut and washer. Do NOT loosen the locking arm.
Click to view attachment

Location of the vacuum advance hose on the plenum.
Click to view attachment

--- Rob
r_towle
Remove the other two screws and pull out the actual advance plates...the plates that your points are attached to.

Be careful not to break the ground strap between the two plates.

Pull them out, pull off the little clip on the side.
There is a single ball bearing in there that could fly across the floor....so go slow.

Open them up and see the sludge....
That is why they don't move well when it gets hot.

Clean and re grease that setup and out it back in place.

Your car will run fine without the vacuum advance. That is there to being on the advance a little earlier, but eventually the rotating for extends the advance plates anyways to full advance.
watsonrx13
Rich, which (2) screws are you talking about removing?

Click to view attachment

--- Rob
watsonrx13
OK, I reread your reply and did the following

1. Removed screw from condenser and removed from distributor
2. Removed (2) screws that held the clips
3. Carefully removed the actual advance plates
4. Removed clip with ball bearing

What should I use to clean the parts? Can I use some aerosol electronic cleaner I got from Radio Shack?

After cleaning, where should I put grease?

Before shot
Click to view attachment

After condenser removal
Click to view attachment

After (2) clip and advance plate removal
Click to view attachment

Dirty distributor
Click to view attachment

Clip with ball bearing removed
Click to view attachment


--- Rob
Dtjaden
Carb or brake cleaner would work well. The RS cleaner will most likely not be strong enough.

QUOTE(watsonrx13 @ May 11 2014, 08:44 AM) *

OK, I reread your reply and did the following

1. Removed screw from condenser and removed from distributor
2. Removed (2) screws that held the clips
3. Carefully removed the actual advance plates
4. Removed clip with ball bearing


What should I use to clean the parts? Can I use some aerosol electronic cleaner I got from Radio Shack?

After cleaning, where should I put grease?

Before shot
Click to view attachment

After condenser removal
Click to view attachment

After (2) clip and advance plate removal
Click to view attachment

Dirty distributor
Click to view attachment

Clip with ball bearing removed
Click to view attachment


--- Rob

birthday3.gif
watsonrx13
Cleaned parts. BTW, I added a small amount of grease between the plates at the center opening.

Now all I have to do is reinstall and test drive.

Click to view attachment

--- Rob
watsonrx13
Successful test drive. The engine idles great and there is no longer a hesitation around 3000 RPM.

Thanks to everyone that has assisted me with this issue.

By documenting my steps hopefully this will help the next NineFourTeener.

--- Rob
r_towle
Was at moms today.

You found it....
I use whatever cleaner I have laying around...anything to get rid of the grease.
Re grease it with wheel bearing grease, making sure to glob a bit on the ball...and lightly coat the two pieces.

Hopefully you will have felt a difference when in your hand trying to move them before and after you did the cleaning.

With the weak power that vacuum advance canister applies, and sticky old grease, and loads of heat...they don't always retard from partial advance...which causes the high idle, and all sorts of other weird behavior..

It may not solve everything, but at least you know you have done that, it's good for another 40 years....and the rest of the tuning is not that.

Rich
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2024 Invision Power Services, Inc.