Version 1


Version 2


Version 3


Version 4

Version 1 I hate big BUGS

1.

- easy to read
- a-symetrical (which makes it more interesting, visually) ...

Andy

i voted 3 the bug isnt overwhelming and i like the psuedo cursive with the block style

#1 just looks like more FUN!

#1, just seems to flow better and catches the eye.

#1

Neat use of graphics, legible, would look good on top of a window.

In all honesty......

THEY ALL SUCK.... Really..

The truth is better than bullshit.....

Twystd1

I voted for #1 for the same reasons given above. The offset text and tilted bug give it dimension. The a-symetry does catch your eye.

QUOTE (SirAndy @ Jan 20 2005, 04:03 PM)

1. - easy to read - a-symetrical (which makes it more interesting, visually) ... Andy

What he said

QUOTE (Twystd1 @ Jan 20 2005, 07:08 PM)

In all honesty...... THEY ALL SUCK.... Really.. The truth is better than bullshit..... Twystd1

what a dickweed...you could just say that you didn't care for them or you could explain why they suck...whatever

QUOTE (SirAndy @ Jan 20 2005, 04:03 PM)

1. - easy to read - a-symetrical (which makes it more interesting, visually) ... Andy

Lisa

I voted for v1 as well because I have no will of my own. No, just kidding, I like the Name being the main focus of the logo...

#1 because the font looked more jungle-bugs-weeds-stuff and the image wasn't overwhelming (bug)

Maybe if you did #2 with #1's font.

#2 as its easy to read and a nice design!

I like #1 Sean. Looks like a modern business logo.

Rick

one or two...

#1 with #3's font, and the n the correct way

#4

I like it cause it's symetrical

I can't believe that dude said they all suck! It brings to mind the old saying "if you don't have something nice to add then shut the F%&@ up A##hole!"

I like Junebugz font in #1 with the bug that size, but with the word graphics in a font like it is in #4 as well as the overall layout from 2, 3, or 4.

I voted for #4 because I wanted to be different.

No. 1 because I like the use of the bug for a slash. But I dont like the "Z" for an "S" it is way over used IMHO.

what is the target client?

younger and more creative, i say #1.

more conservative client, #3 or #4.

if doing business cards and stationary, no reason why you can't have a couple to accomodate your audience.

but all of them look great since i am still working on making stick figures on my pc!

larry,
I bought the domain a couple of years ago...junebugs.com was way gone...soooooo....junebugz.com was next.
Originally, I was gonna make a kids site with coloring book pages and stuff, but I nixed that ide so it sat dormant.
I decided to do the vinyl graphics under the Junebugz Graphics moniker.

Andy hit the nail on the head. Number 1 is easier to read. And afterall, that is kinda important. You might want to emphasize the "Z" though since it is different than normal and like you said, JunebugS is already taken. You don't want to drive people to the wrong site.

#2 - I like the layout but the font needs something

Mike D.

I didn't read anyones replies to the thread so as not to be influenced , but I like the "haphazard" look of the font in Version #1. Kind of how June bugs fly (into the side of the house, into your hair, smacking off the sliding glass door...)

I voted for Nader.



M

I like the subtle elegance of #1, however, I suggest that whichever you choose, please add the other set of legs that's missing in these representations. Presents "visual tension" , at least for me. Insects have six legs. . . .

Good luck,

I like the layout of #1 and the font from #3.

Insects have six legs. . . .

Good luck, [/QUOTE]
Terrible bug-zapper accident.....JB doesn't like to talk about it.

I like #1 because it flows the best.

#1
flows better to the eye

Bernie

I voted for #1. Just seemed more pleasing to me.

I went through logo selection and registration for a company
I started about 10 years ago.

Some other things you may want to consider.
How does it look when zeroxed? i.e. does it still look ok in b/w? (FAXes)
Logos that are long and narrow don't work as well on certain
things like watch faces, polo shirts, or shirt pockets.
You may want to consider a graphic only portion without
text that can be used as well.

A good example of this is to look at the Sun Microsystems logo.
SUN Microsystems Logo (upper left corner)
They have their full logo which includes a graphic of the
letters "S-U-N" along with text. They also have just the "SUN" logo.

When you register your logo with the PTO it is a full graphic regardless
if it is just a graphic or a graphic with text.
So if you decide to register it, you may want to register multiple
versions so that you can protect versions with and with out text.

--- bill