Went to a Porsche show today and had a close up look of the new Cayenne.....I told my self I'd reserve my judgement until I saw it in the flesh...And (imho) it doesn't work -its F.ugly.
Although its performance is unquestionable....EVO magazine recorded that it was quicker round their test track than a BMW M3!!

some good cars there tho-

another-

Nice USA import....never got to speak to the owner-Steel flares and usa tail lights

some more

Nice pics, thanks..

IMHO, As long as it keeps Porsche in production, and keeps their up their budget, then I dont really care, Like the 924.. I dont particularly like it, but it saved the comp, and its an older sibling of the 944's (which I like alot).

Andrew

how the heck can that be faster around the track than an M3!?

my buddy and i did a little car shopping in the rain last week. he's in suburban/stationwagon mode. the local p dealer has one of each and the turbo was optioned out to almost 100k. i lost my woodie.

I didn't realise that Porsche was so late to the game...

I saw a Ferrari SUV today: a Donzai or something close. Other than being the bright red color, normal for those cars, there didn't seem to be anything special. It did say it was 5 liters, on the back.



James

Yes, I did raise my eyebrows ....but I figured that these are journalists' primarily and not race drivers. Having said that they do test cars for a living and should be pretty tasty drivers -better than your average Joe.
EVO quoted :-
Porsche Cayenne Turbo 126.85
BMW M3 126.85
So NOT actually faster but an amazing achievement.