QUOTE(ClayPerrine @ Jul 17 2020, 11:25 PM)
Not saying you are wrong, but that is a completely different chart from the one I used.
Clay
No worries
@ClayPerrine . I assumed it was an oversight.
In fact,
there is a google chart that pops up from time to time on fastener searches that is blatently erroneous and doesn't reference tensile strengh. That's why I posted the chart and the source URL. It's a good reference by actual tensile strength and also had the common bolt and nut markings to help ID them. It's also easy to mess up the conversion between imperial units and metric when doing the conversions for comparision - been there done that.
I'm an engineer and have done quite a bit of fastener testing and you wouldn't believe how deep it can get with respect to fasteners. Proof load, yield, tenslile load. Torque vs. stretch? Physical measurement of stretch vs. ultrasonic measurement. Measurement of clamp load vs. torque. On and on.
Don't even get me started on AN fasteners (Army Navy Standards).
As always, I encourage people to double check me. I'm just another dope on the Interwebz. Don't take what I say for gospel. Do your own homework when it really matters. Here is another datapoint from NAPA just to make sure I'm not fibbing.
http://knowhow.napaonline.com/common-autom...asteners-guide/