QUOTE(technicalninja @ Sep 17 2023, 01:32 PM)
Why did they not just use 911 stuff from the start?
It was already in process, and it cannot be any cheaper to design and build stuff that is less than 20% different.
And it would have made it easier for enthusiasts 50 years down the road...
911 parts are complicated (separate hubs, fasteners, rotors) - they are way more expensive than 914/4 parts by a large margin.
Redesign between early and late costs very little for the engineering. The ability to use more common and cheaper parts vs changing a few machining operations on the strut is overwhelming. In automotive, variable cost of parts is always way more than the overhead cost of engineering the part. Parts get changed to save penny’s. $0.05 per part x 100,000 part on something like a Silverado (600,000 per year) is $30k saved per year. If that change is transparent to the customer, transparent to the manufacturing plant, and doesn’t degrade warranty costs, it’s just lost revenue. Despite what the public may believe, automotive is a low profit margin industry. Cost efficiency matters a lot.
No one, and I do mean no one, engineers a car for service 50 years down the road. In modern age, no one engineers beyond program life cycle (6-10 years).