Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: OT: 4 Valve Vs. 2 Valve
914World.com > The 914 Forums > 914World Garage
windforfun
?????

popcorn[1].gif popcorn[1].gif popcorn[1].gif
Rufus
4v - allows optimized plug location which allows higher compression ratio,
allows greater valve area for better breathing / volumetric efficiency,
reduces valve train mass for each valve spring to control, which raises valve train rpm limit
technicalninja
25-40% more airflow.
Almost always cross flow.
Less "curtain" regarding valves
Automatically makes it hemispherical (or semi-hemi)
Valves are significantly lighter allowing for less valve spring tension which reduces frictional losses. Higher engine speed because of this.
Total cam drive load can drop more than 50%.
Less stress on camshaft drive equipment.

Forces center chamber plug location (single plug heads) Reduces "burn time" allowing less timing to reach MBT.

Normally smaller valve stem diameter and less side loading on valve. Reduces guide wear.

Only downside that I can see is added complexity. This can make shim style valve adjustments a PIA.
Many Toyota V8 have 32 valves to adjust!
brant
Incoming charge increase
Easier exhaust scavenging

Turbos also force more air in
But more valves reduce NA restrictions for intake
930cabman
More air in and more air out = more power

Check out the Ferrari 355 developed in the mid 90's. 5 valves/cylinder
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2024 Invision Power Services, Inc.