QUOTE(Amenson @ Feb 9 2015, 09:29 AM)
Ya, about those gaps...
...
I see one of the tube mockup thingies in your picture. Does it help?
I am in the same boat. I know that the current bar works but is way beefy. Something lighter will work, just don't want to risk going too light. Luckily somebody
is providing a tail shift engine bar for me to use or reference for material selection! See you Thursday.
Cheers,
Scott
Quick answer Nope thus the reason for the gaps!!!!! I hate copying others work, but Ian had the right idea here. Easy to mockup, scribe a line, cut, and well, weld in place. It could also allow the brackets to be smaller. Which would help with leverage on the mounts and other factors. With out going into a bunch of force calculations, it becomes basic physics. Less leverage on a given point if it can be avoided, means less stress on the given point, thus lighter materials can be used.
The issue with the tube tool is keeping it oriented correctly, keeping a constant angle on the tube that matches the finale angle of the production piece. Then be able to get it in there. So I marked a line on the tube. Marked a line on the tool, always keep the two on the marked lines. And still got a gap.
It was closer than if I had done it with a pencil, and just guessing, but not close enough for me to say it was easier.
If some one has an easier way, I am open to suggestions. Wood dowels, build a prototype, and then recreate it with metal. I used to do it with a roll of tape, and a sharpie, it works. I have also used a holes, but that works in fitting two tubes. This should have been a simple angle calculation.
I could weld up a box section, two sides to build the angle then make a pattern and for the other two sides and fill it in.
That would have been way easier, and could be made just as strong or stronger do to better joints. And I would have been done, when we had a nice day to weld outdid yesterday
Tube is just so sexy though, I keep going back to it.