Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: 2.0 throttle body mod's.
914World.com > The 914 Forums > 914World Garage
orange914
just wondering what t.b. conversions are out there and what issues have been incured?.
what size is the stock t.b. anyway
Jake Raby
The stock unit is adequate for 150HP and 2300ccs....

Krieger
The stock TB has a 45mm plate. You could bore out the stock TB 3 mm or so before you start to run out of roomand have a new plate made. The opening in the plenum it bolts to is wider than the TB- I can't remember but its about 50 mm. I don't think anyone makes conversion.
914Sixer
Jake said it all !!!
jd74914
Don't bore it out.

Think of it using this equation:

m(dot)= p*A*V.
(p is a constant, the density of air)

The engine consumes a finite amount of air (M(dot)). This value is only dependent on engine speed. The air's speed is inversely dependent on the area of the TB/runners it flows through (A). When these have larger cross-sectional areas the air inside of them moves at a slower rate (V), which kills efficiency. Maximum power can be found with air speeds of around .4 or .5 mach usually. Once you go supersonic efficiency drops though.

Basically you want high intake port air velocity for best performance. smile.gif
orange914
QUOTE(jd74914 @ Dec 13 2007, 04:09 PM) *

Don't bore it out.

Basically you want high intake port air velocity for best performance. smile.gif


QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Dec 13 2007, 02:59 PM) *

The stock unit is adequate for 150HP and 2300ccs....


thumb3d.gif
sounds like any mods would defeat any gains for street 2056 d-jet
TeenerTim
Is the 2.0 bigger than the 1.7 and do the 2.0 injectors flow more than the 1.7?
jd74914
2.0 Injectors flow significantly more than 1.7s. I would assume the TB is also larger.
Jake Raby
The 2.0 plenum is larger, but it's design is the least effective of all the plenums, even on larger displacement engines. Design overcomes size in this situation.

Boring out the stock T/B without altering the engine and the rest of the intake system only HURTS drivability, especially throttle response. Been there, done that.
orange914
QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Dec 14 2007, 12:28 PM) *

The 2.0 plenum is larger, but it's design is the least effective of all the plenums, even on larger displacement engines. Design overcomes size in this situation.



is air flow of the plenum ineffective becouse of shape (boxy/not smooth air flow) or other factor/s? if so has any one messed with upgrading negatives of 2.0 plenum?

mostly just curious idea.gif


sean_v8_914
jake:
tell us more about the 2.0 plenum. would a 1.8 plenum work better with a 2.0 TB on a 2.0? what did you discover to be the problem with this plenum?
ConeDodger
QUOTE(orange914 @ Dec 13 2007, 01:20 PM) *

just wondering what t.b. conversions are out there and what issues have been incured?.
what size is the stock t.b. anyway


Mike,
Your toes are on the diving board at the pool of misery. Change that and you have a chain of changes you must make to rectify the way the car runs. blink.gif
orange914
QUOTE(ConeDodger @ Dec 15 2007, 11:04 AM) *

QUOTE(orange914 @ Dec 13 2007, 01:20 PM) *

just wondering what t.b. conversions are out there and what issues have been incured?.
what size is the stock t.b. anyway


Mike,
Your toes are on the diving board at the pool of misery. Change that and you have a chain of changes you must make to rectify the way the car runs. blink.gif


yep, i guess i was more curious. mostly q&a session while im waiting on my cylinders for the next stage of the build. hopefully i'm not leaving any stones unturned on this 1.7 to 2056 d-jet conversion. jeff's going to set the mps/check the harness. always good to know others experiances with this stuff beerchug.gif

mike
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2024 Invision Power Services, Inc.