nuff said
Full Version: OT: #1 Vote for Most Stupid Kit Car
I thought it looked pretty good. 
FWD! AAH HA HA HA HA!
Yeah, all the world's greatest sports cars are front wheel drive.
Yeah, all the world's greatest sports cars are front wheel drive.
Maybe not the best handeling or performance car, but I didn't think it was bad lloking, actually was appealing to me. 
We are talking abot the yellow car right?
We are talking abot the yellow car right?
QUOTE(plymouth37 @ Jan 17 2008, 05:40 PM) 
Agreed! And you don't have to find a running Fiero to build it!
Looks pretty good.
Now, THIS, on the other hand . . .
Now, THIS, on the other hand . . .
How about this one.
Built on a C6 Vette platform.....
Beauty is very subjective. =)
http://www.57classicchevy.com/789-chevy.html
Built on a C6 Vette platform.....
Beauty is very subjective. =)
http://www.57classicchevy.com/789-chevy.html
They reworked the c-pillar lines, headlight outline, and removed the negative character line. It could use refinement but not bad work IMHO, you can hardly tell what the donor car was or that it is not mid-engine...
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
The tail is the most out of proportion and the fake engine bay is pretty lame...
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
Umm, that rear end does not look out of proportion at all. In fact, it looks exactly in proportion to a real Ferrari F430 to me.
I went back and looked at all of the pictures closely. There is no way that yellow car in those pictures is made from a Toyota Celica. Sorry, no way. Too many problems, for ex., the front engine, shock towers, radiator, etc. would not fit under that sleek front end on the yellow car.
I also hadn't seen the supposed "fake" Ferrari engine. The "fake" engine in the picture is too well done and detailed to be fake.
LOL.
I went back and looked at all of the pictures closely. There is no way that yellow car in those pictures is made from a Toyota Celica. Sorry, no way. Too many problems, for ex., the front engine, shock towers, radiator, etc. would not fit under that sleek front end on the yellow car.
I also hadn't seen the supposed "fake" Ferrari engine. The "fake" engine in the picture is too well done and detailed to be fake.
LOL.
better looking that the 9014... sorry George, but thats one ugly sombich
QUOTE(914-8 @ Jan 17 2008, 09:44 PM)
Now, THIS, on the other hand . . .
awww hey now! i happen to love my chalon
Guys. They're trying to pull a fast one on you.
They've shot pictures of a real Ferrari. Seriously.
Notice how there aren't any pictures of the front engine bay, and the rear engine bay look mighty real to me....
Meanwhile, their real product will just be a rebody on a celica chassis. It'll look like drek and none of the panels will match up quite right.
They've shot pictures of a real Ferrari. Seriously.
Notice how there aren't any pictures of the front engine bay, and the rear engine bay look mighty real to me....
Meanwhile, their real product will just be a rebody on a celica chassis. It'll look like drek and none of the panels will match up quite right.
"Paintings of our blank SenseCars are tailor-made according to our customers' order. "
They don't speak english none too good.
In case you really can't tell what they said- they paint to spec.
In case you really can't tell what they said- they paint to spec.
QUOTE(alpha434 @ Jan 18 2008, 07:44 AM)
Guys. They're trying to pull a fast one on you.
They've shot pictures of a real Ferrari. Seriously.
Notice how there aren't any pictures of the front engine bay, and the rear engine bay look mighty real to me....
Meanwhile, their real product will just be a rebody on a celica chassis. It'll look like drek and none of the panels will match up quite right.
Now here is a funny lookin car
Click to view attachment
QUOTE(alpha434 @ Jan 18 2008, 08:31 AM)
They don't speak english none too good.
In case you really can't tell what they said- they paint to spec.
Ahhh... thanks for the transliteration.
QUOTE(degreeoff @ Jan 18 2008, 08:32 AM)
QUOTE(alpha434 @ Jan 18 2008, 07:44 AM)
Guys. They're trying to pull a fast one on you.
They've shot pictures of a real Ferrari. Seriously.
Notice how there aren't any pictures of the front engine bay, and the rear engine bay look mighty real to me....
Meanwhile, their real product will just be a rebody on a celica chassis. It'll look like drek and none of the panels will match up quite right.
Now here is a funny lookin car
Click to view attachment
Can that be the fabled "Mulholland Look"?
On the flip side I like the color....! reminds me of sumtin...?
QUOTE(7TPorsh @ Jan 17 2008, 05:30 PM)
You know what I think is funny....
The pictures are of a real Ferrari, and this is your response.
QUOTE(alpha434 @ Jan 18 2008, 10:15 AM)
QUOTE(7TPorsh @ Jan 17 2008, 05:30 PM)
You know what I think is funny....
The pictures are of a real Ferrari, and this is your response.
LOL, true!
wonder what it really looks like in the details
How do you fake a Ferrari engine?
How do you fake a Ferrari engine?
Crap, I liked the Fiore in its day. 
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.