Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: ok any chemists among us?
914World.com > The 914 Forums > 914World Garage
messix
i'm thinking BS
http://www.mygassaver.net/index.htm
dw914er
Golly, Can it be real?????

probably not (i call bs too)
SirAndy
IMHO, anybody who ends a sentence/headline with " - Guaranteed" is lying ...

shades.gif Andy

PS: the whole ad sounds like one of them fake viagra webpages ...
Danny_Ocean
Do a Google search on the huckster's name "Kacper M. Postawski"...that should tell you all you need to know about Ethos... IPB Image
mudfoot76
QUOTE(SirAndy @ May 2 2008, 03:09 PM) *

IMHO, anybody who ends a sentence/headline with " - Guaranteed" is lying ...


agree.gif

I only made it about 30% through the opening page before I hit my tolerance for BS. You might as well put rare-earth magnets, the Tubonator in your intake and have a prayer vigil because it will have as much positive effect as pouring 'ethos' into your tank.

It has been pointed out here before - if there was an easy solution to increasing fuel economy, the automakers and the petroleum companies would be all over it.
ericread
YAY! Does this mean I no longer have to use my gas magnets and I can stop burning water as my fuel???

Finally, a solution for all of us!!! laugh.gif
DNHunt
The guy offered 7 -19% improvement. I think if you keep your tires inlated well, the car tuned up and drive conservatively with a goal toward fuel economy and you can get those kind of results with almost any vehicle. Granted that's not easy for a bunch like us. Also, how easy is it to measure a 7% increase.
Madswede
I'm a chemical engineer working in the nuclear field now, but I do remember something of my combustion engineering course and organic chemistry courses. My first read of this, and some brief research, seemed to indicate that it actually could be effective ... but it depends on the car, driver, conditions, and probably some no small amount of psychology. I've observed that when it comes to things like this, people want to see improvement and will actually changing their driving habits, in the process becoming more efficient drivers.

This whole website is touting the effects of adding organic chemicals of the family called "esters" to gasoline. I know this is done for diesel, both to stablize it for burning at lower temperatures and to improve efficiency and performance, so it would seem perhaps this would positively affect gasoline engines as well. Probably a different ester (there are whole slews of them, they're a family of organic compounds that actually tend to smell very nice - look up a Wiki article on "ester" for much more).

I think this is not so much about a product that will lower the effective volatility of the gasoline mixture (which seems to be a lot of what the initial discussion / background over-simplification discussion seems to be about). Gas companies already add all sorts of things to improve volatility, and most modern cars (unless they're made in Britain it seems) don't have serious issues with lower-volatility fuels even in extreme heat (vapor lock), probably due to improved fuel pumps operating at higher pressures, as well as better fuel lines.

Also, I don't think the explanation that esters "break up" the "thick, heavy gasoline molecules" is entirely accurate - it's more of an explanation one would give to a child, and isn't really explaining much. I don't think esters are actually catalyzing the gasoline-oxygen chemical reactions as much as they are helping combust the initial byproducts of some of the first, or quickest combustion reactions that occur - overall, improving the combustion process to more simpler end products (reducing pollution, but actually increasing carbon dioxide output). This is what probably is reducing the so-called "engine wear" due to buildup as well as all the carbon black that's all over our exhaust pipes.

I have to be honest. I'm not entirely certain what's going on exactly with the esters being added, but I think it's probably some sort of reverse esterification reaction that affects some of the fuel and it's volatility. Esters can react to form alcohols that in turn burn "better" than some of the things in gasoline, as most people already know or have been told many times over ("ethanol added to improve fuel economy"). That apparently is part of the formulation, a smaller ester molecule (there are two, it appears) in this "Ethos" that improves full combustion of hydrocarbon molecules to the ultimate carbon dioxide, instead of carbon black that sticks to metal. The second ester molecule apparently helps reduce that "sticking" of carbon black to metals, and is apparently good for lubricity as well. (I love that word ... lubricity ... laugh.gif)

The timing of the multiple combustion reactions that occur is nothing short of superultramegacomplex. There are people at DOE laboratories (I've met a couple) that use some of the fastest supercomputers in the world to try to model all of the combustion reactions occurring in a few milliseconds in the cylinder of a combustion-chamber powered engine. It's seriously complicated shit, in other words. I've wanted to study the myriad of chemical reactions that occur in a cylinder, but I ain't that bright. And I don't have a a spare $billion or two to get the computer together I'd need. blink.gif

Some research online turned up a couple patent applications that helped me with the above, but nothing really all that knowledgeable except other references to this same product. I did come across some people trying acetone with some limited but similar results claimed by the ester guy. Acetone is not an ester, but a ketone - somewhat similar to esters in that it has oxygen double bonded to carbon, as esters do, but lacking the complexity of esters. It's a great solvent, as I'm sure many people here could vouch for.

Also, I found that esterification is an important part of stablizing biodiesel fuels, particularly for colder climates. So having esters in diesel is desirable. Perhaps something similar is occuring in a gasoline mixture - esters can be reacted to their "parent" alcohols. In fact, a process called "saponification" is where esters in fats (animal or plant) are converted to alcohols and acid salts (glycerol and fatty acids respectively in this case), making soap. Maybe that's how it cleans the engine. rolleyes.gif

- Nelson (waiting for new brake rotors, with time on his hands)
Sleepin
.....wow Nelson......




You sound just like my older brother...he is a chemist as well. I usually hear "The cool thing is the nucleus blahblahblahblah....."

biggrin.gif
Dave_Darling
QUOTE(DNHunt @ May 2 2008, 12:23 PM) *
I think if you keep your tires inlated well, the car tuned up and drive conservatively with a goal toward fuel economy and you can get those kind of results with almost any vehicle.


More like 30%-50%. Google "hypermiler" some time...

--DD
ericread
QUOTE(Madswede @ May 2 2008, 04:15 PM) *

I'm a chemical engineer working in the nuclear field now, but I do remember something of my combustion engineering course and organic chemistry courses. My first read of this, and some brief research, seemed to indicate that it actually could be effective ... but it depends on the car, driver, conditions, and probably some no small amount of psychology. I've observed that when it comes to things like this, people want to see improvement and will actually changing their driving habits, in the process becoming more efficient drivers.

This whole website is touting the effects of adding organic chemicals of the family called "esters" to gasoline. I know this is done for diesel, both to stablize it for burning at lower temperatures and to improve efficiency and performance, so it would seem perhaps this would positively affect gasoline engines as well. Probably a different ester (there are whole slews of them, they're a family of organic compounds that actually tend to smell very nice - look up a Wiki article on "ester" for much more).

I think this is not so much about a product that will lower the effective volatility of the gasoline mixture (which seems to be a lot of what the initial discussion / background over-simplification discussion seems to be about). Gas companies already add all sorts of things to improve volatility, and most modern cars (unless they're made in Britain it seems) don't have serious issues with lower-volatility fuels even in extreme heat (vapor lock), probably due to improved fuel pumps operating at higher pressures, as well as better fuel lines.

Also, I don't think the explanation that esters "break up" the "thick, heavy gasoline molecules" is entirely accurate - it's more of an explanation one would give to a child, and isn't really explaining much. I don't think esters are actually catalyzing the gasoline-oxygen chemical reactions as much as they are helping combust the initial byproducts of some of the first, or quickest combustion reactions that occur - overall, improving the combustion process to more simpler end products (reducing pollution, but actually increasing carbon dioxide output). This is what probably is reducing the so-called "engine wear" due to buildup as well as all the carbon black that's all over our exhaust pipes.

I have to be honest. I'm not entirely certain what's going on exactly with the esters being added, but I think it's probably some sort of reverse esterification reaction that affects some of the fuel and it's volatility. Esters can react to form alcohols that in turn burn "better" than some of the things in gasoline, as most people already know or have been told many times over ("ethanol added to improve fuel economy"). That apparently is part of the formulation, a smaller ester molecule (there are two, it appears) in this "Ethos" that improves full combustion of hydrocarbon molecules to the ultimate carbon dioxide, instead of carbon black that sticks to metal. The second ester molecule apparently helps reduce that "sticking" of carbon black to metals, and is apparently good for lubricity as well. (I love that word ... lubricity ... laugh.gif)

The timing of the multiple combustion reactions that occur is nothing short of superultramegacomplex. There are people at DOE laboratories (I've met a couple) that use some of the fastest supercomputers in the world to try to model all of the combustion reactions occurring in a few milliseconds in the cylinder of a combustion-chamber powered engine. It's seriously complicated shit, in other words. I've wanted to study the myriad of chemical reactions that occur in a cylinder, but I ain't that bright. And I don't have a a spare $billion or two to get the computer together I'd need. blink.gif

Some research online turned up a couple patent applications that helped me with the above, but nothing really all that knowledgeable except other references to this same product. I did come across some people trying acetone with some limited but similar results claimed by the ester guy. Acetone is not an ester, but a ketone - somewhat similar to esters in that it has oxygen double bonded to carbon, as esters do, but lacking the complexity of esters. It's a great solvent, as I'm sure many people here could vouch for.

Also, I found that esterification is an important part of stablizing biodiesel fuels, particularly for colder climates. So having esters in diesel is desirable. Perhaps something similar is occuring in a gasoline mixture - esters can be reacted to their "parent" alcohols. In fact, a process called "saponification" is where esters in fats (animal or plant) are converted to alcohols and acid salts (glycerol and fatty acids respectively in this case), making soap. Maybe that's how it cleans the engine. rolleyes.gif

- Nelson (waiting for new brake rotors, with time on his hands)


SO... Can I replace my gas magnets with this or not?


scotty b
QUOTE(DNHunt @ May 2 2008, 12:23 PM) *

The guy offered 7 -19% improvement. I think if you keep your tires inlated well, the car tuned up and drive conservatively with a goal toward fuel economy and you can get those kind of results with almost any vehicle. Granted that's not easy for a bunch like us. Also, how easy is it to measure a 7% increase.



Reminds me of an episode of Top Gear where Jeremy Clarkson drove an Audi IIRC with the sole intent of seeing just how good gas mileage it could get. I htink they stated it typically got around 28 mpg and by the end of testing they were getting close to if not 40 mpg. Driving speed lijmit, windows up, no A.C. shifting at the exact appropriate rpm, driving like a gandma Very interesting to see what is possible vs what we actually get. I'll see if I can find the episode or better memories blink.gif
Elliot Cannon
QUOTE(SirAndy @ May 2 2008, 12:09 PM) *

IMHO, anybody who ends a sentence/headline with " - Guaranteed" is lying ...

shades.gif Andy

PS: the whole ad sounds like one of them fake viagra webpages ...


VIAGRA IS FAKE!!!?????
scotty b
Memory refreshed smile.gif Audi A8 diesel.

Clip here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4113162060604318409
So.Cal.914
***GUARANTEED***

Yes thats right, your eyes are not deceiving you. Just $29.95 and you too can have this Analog Throttle Control System. Just minutes to install, it replaces the original stop bolt under the Accelerator Peddle. Only $29.95, PM me NOW.

Click to view attachment

Eric_Shea
QUOTE
I'm a chemical engineer working in the nuclear field now, but I do remember something of my combustion engineering course and organic chemistry courses. My first read of this, and some brief research, seemed to indicate that it actually could be effective ... but it depends on the car, driver, conditions, and probably some no small amount of psychology. I've observed that when it comes to things like this, people want to see improvement and will actually changing their driving habits, in the process becoming more efficient drivers.

This whole website is touting the effects of adding organic chemicals of the family called "esters" to gasoline. I know this is done for diesel, both to stablize it for burning at lower temperatures and to improve efficiency and performance, so it would seem perhaps this would positively affect gasoline engines as well. Probably a different ester (there are whole slews of them, they're a family of organic compounds that actually tend to smell very nice - look up a Wiki article on "ester" for much more).

I think this is not so much about a product that will lower the effective volatility of the gasoline mixture (which seems to be a lot of what the initial discussion / background over-simplification discussion seems to be about). Gas companies already add all sorts of things to improve volatility, and most modern cars (unless they're made in Britain it seems) don't have serious issues with lower-volatility fuels even in extreme heat (vapor lock), probably due to improved fuel pumps operating at higher pressures, as well as better fuel lines.

Also, I don't think the explanation that esters "break up" the "thick, heavy gasoline molecules" is entirely accurate - it's more of an explanation one would give to a child, and isn't really explaining much. I don't think esters are actually catalyzing the gasoline-oxygen chemical reactions as much as they are helping combust the initial byproducts of some of the first, or quickest combustion reactions that occur - overall, improving the combustion process to more simpler end products (reducing pollution, but actually increasing carbon dioxide output). This is what probably is reducing the so-called "engine wear" due to buildup as well as all the carbon black that's all over our exhaust pipes.

I have to be honest. I'm not entirely certain what's going on exactly with the esters being added, but I think it's probably some sort of reverse esterification reaction that affects some of the fuel and it's volatility. Esters can react to form alcohols that in turn burn "better" than some of the things in gasoline, as most people already know or have been told many times over ("ethanol added to improve fuel economy"). That apparently is part of the formulation, a smaller ester molecule (there are two, it appears) in this "Ethos" that improves full combustion of hydrocarbon molecules to the ultimate carbon dioxide, instead of carbon black that sticks to metal. The second ester molecule apparently helps reduce that "sticking" of carbon black to metals, and is apparently good for lubricity as well. (I love that word ... lubricity ... )

The timing of the multiple combustion reactions that occur is nothing short of superultramegacomplex. There are people at DOE laboratories (I've met a couple) that use some of the fastest supercomputers in the world to try to model all of the combustion reactions occurring in a few milliseconds in the cylinder of a combustion-chamber powered engine. It's seriously complicated shit, in other words. I've wanted to study the myriad of chemical reactions that occur in a cylinder, but I ain't that bright. And I don't have a a spare $billion or two to get the computer together I'd need.

Some research online turned up a couple patent applications that helped me with the above, but nothing really all that knowledgeable except other references to this same product. I did come across some people trying acetone with some limited but similar results claimed by the ester guy. Acetone is not an ester, but a ketone - somewhat similar to esters in that it has oxygen double bonded to carbon, as esters do, but lacking the complexity of esters. It's a great solvent, as I'm sure many people here could vouch for.

Also, I found that esterification is an important part of stablizing biodiesel fuels, particularly for colder climates. So having esters in diesel is desirable. Perhaps something similar is occuring in a gasoline mixture - esters can be reacted to their "parent" alcohols. In fact, a process called "saponification" is where esters in fats (animal or plant) are converted to alcohols and acid salts (glycerol and fatty acids respectively in this case), making soap. Maybe that's how it cleans the engine.

- Nelson (waiting for new brake rotors, with time on his hands)


And he plays a mean guitar! wink.gif
SLITS
I was gettin' 27. Then I drank a 750 ml bottle of Cassadores and pissed in my tank. I got 33 after that.
Rand
chairfall.gif drunk.gif
championgt1
QUOTE(SirAndy @ May 2 2008, 12:09 PM) *

IMHO, anybody who ends a sentence/headline with " - Guaranteed" is lying ...

shades.gif Andy

PS: the whole ad sounds like one of them fake viagra webpages ...



agree.gif It is a guaranteed piece of shit.
Elliot Cannon
QUOTE(SLITS @ May 2 2008, 09:24 PM) *

I was gettin' 27. Then I drank a 750 ml bottle of Cassadores and pissed in my tank. I got 33 after that.
av-943.gif


My Dad: Seetheart, if you die before me I promise I'll pour a bottle of the best bourbon on your grave every week.

My Mom: Thank you dear, that's sweet.

My Dad: 'Course I'll have to drink it first!! av-943.gif


Not sure why I posted this but Ron seems to stir up the funnest memories.
jimtab
QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ May 2 2008, 06:34 PM) *

QUOTE(SirAndy @ May 2 2008, 12:09 PM) *

IMHO, anybody who ends a sentence/headline with " - Guaranteed" is lying ...

shades.gif Andy

PS: the whole ad sounds like one of them fake viagra webpages ...


VIAGRA IS FAKE!!!?????


See Elliot, like Dumbo's magic feather, and all this time you've been doing it by yourself....... biggrin.gif
So.Cal.914
QUOTE(jimtab @ May 3 2008, 01:14 AM) *

QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ May 2 2008, 06:34 PM) *

QUOTE(SirAndy @ May 2 2008, 12:09 PM) *

IMHO, anybody who ends a sentence/headline with " - Guaranteed" is lying ...

shades.gif Andy

PS: the whole ad sounds like one of them fake viagra webpages ...


VIAGRA IS FAKE!!!?????


See Elliot, like Dumbo's magic feather, and all this time you've been doing it by yourself....... biggrin.gif


Sorry Elliot, But Jim, that was damned funny, good use of a metaphor... smile.gif
Justinp71
Did you see how expensive it is??? $54 for two bottles... Can't buy just one, its probably just some sort of octane booster... SCAM. Definetly trying to sheeplove.gif everyone.

Edit: If you watch the video the stuff they used was different and it cost less...
BarberDave
smilie_pokal.gif

O.K. This is a 914 World, Exclusive only offered here !!!

For $15.00 i will fart in a 1/2 qt. mason jar,send it to you,open jar,place over

gas filler leave there for 2 yrs. it will combine will gasoline by my secret

process , And I guarantee a 32.6143 0/0 increase in fuel economy. Hurry

while the supply lasts. Dave slap.gif
SLITS
QUOTE(BarberDave @ May 3 2008, 09:21 PM) *

smilie_pokal.gif

O.K. This is a 914 World, Exclusive only offered here !!!

For $15.00 i will fart in a 1/2 qt. mason jar,send it to you,open jar,place over

gas filler leave there for 2 yrs. it will combine will gasoline by my secret

process , And I guarantee a 32.6143 0/0 increase in fuel economy. Hurry

while the supply lasts. Dave slap.gif


I'll go you one better .... you buy the bottle ... I'll drink it and piss for free .... AND it won't make the gasoline smell icon8.gif
BarberDave
smilie_pokal.gif

SLITS:

My process is better, 914 will only smell like . B. Ribs and baked beans

In the other post of mine I forgott to add, exhaust system must be in excellent

condition, because when combustion occures , that law of action-reaction goes

into affect. Hurry call while the operators are on duty. For the guys N. of the border

there is a additional ser charge of .067342 0/0 on each bottle. Hurry they are

floating out the door as I set her. PPPPPPPPPPPTTTTTTTTTT
Dave slap.gif
zymurgist
Great post, Nelson!

QUOTE(Madswede @ May 2 2008, 07:15 PM) *

I don't think esters are actually catalyzing the gasoline-oxygen chemical reactions as much as they are helping combust the initial byproducts of some of the first, or quickest combustion reactions that occur - overall, improving the combustion process to more simpler end products (reducing pollution, but actually increasing carbon dioxide output).


OK, here's my question... if the goal is to improve the combustion of the fuel in the cylinder, doesn't an MSD box do essentially the same thing? It sends a bunch of sparks into the plug, in theory starting multiple flame fronts in the turbulent fuel-air mix.
SLITS
QUOTE(zymurgist @ May 4 2008, 07:19 AM) *

Great post, Nelson!

QUOTE(Madswede @ May 2 2008, 07:15 PM) *

I don't think esters are actually catalyzing the gasoline-oxygen chemical reactions as much as they are helping combust the initial byproducts of some of the first, or quickest combustion reactions that occur - overall, improving the combustion process to more simpler end products (reducing pollution, but actually increasing carbon dioxide output).


OK, here's my question... if the goal is to improve the combustion of the fuel in the cylinder, doesn't an MSD box do essentially the same thing? It sends a bunch of sparks into the plug, in theory starting multiple flame fronts in the turbulent fuel-air mix.


Multiple spark only occurs at lower rpms to more complete the combustion process. Twin plugging is another method of improving flame travel.

The same thing can be achieved by injecting an oxygen donor like nitrous ........... wheeeeeeee.
zymurgist
QUOTE(SLITS @ May 4 2008, 10:49 AM) *

Multiple spark only occurs at lower rpms to more complete the combustion process. Twin plugging is another method of improving flame travel.


D'oh! I should know that... I've been reading books on Porsche 911 engines (Wayne Dempsey's rebuild book and Bruce Anderson's 911 Performance Handbook) and yes, the twin plug benefit is evident at high (think race) rpm's. The PO of my 911 was supposedly building a 2.0 twin-plug motor, but I haven't heard whether he ever put it in a car.
LowGT
I'm a forensic chemist and have done some GC/MS work with gasoline and petroleum products for arson cases. There are a few statements in the article I don't like.

1. The "fake" gas savers use alcohol and petroleum products.

An ester is a carboxylic acid, usually with an alcohol group.

2. Gasoline is a large clumpy molecule.

Nope, gasoline consists of 150-200 individual compounds, it doesn't have a single compound structure. The majority of the compunds have low molecular weights and are volitile, however some compounds aren't even volitile, i.e. black soot in tailpipe.


Their two main points are quite flawed.
Richard Casto
So if I use this new "Ethos" stuff, splitfire plugs, gas magnets, 'run on water" and acetone (Am I missing anything) maybe my car will run with zero fuel costs? biggrin.gif
ericread
QUOTE(jimtab @ May 3 2008, 01:14 AM) *

QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ May 2 2008, 06:34 PM) *

QUOTE(SirAndy @ May 2 2008, 12:09 PM) *

IMHO, anybody who ends a sentence/headline with " - Guaranteed" is lying ...

shades.gif Andy

PS: the whole ad sounds like one of them fake viagra webpages ...


VIAGRA IS FAKE!!!?????


See Elliot, like Dumbo's magic feather, and all this time you've been doing it by yourself....... biggrin.gif


So where can I get this "Dumbo's Magic Feather" stuff?
Pat Garvey
QUOTE(Madswede @ May 2 2008, 05:15 PM) *

I'm a chemical engineer working in the nuclear field now, but I do remember something of my combustion engineering course and organic chemistry courses. My first read of this, and some brief research, seemed to indicate that it actually could be effective ... but it depends on the car, driver, conditions, and probably some no small amount of psychology. I've observed that when it comes to things like this, people want to see improvement and will actually changing their driving habits, in the process becoming more efficient drivers.

This whole website is touting the effects of adding organic chemicals of the family called "esters" to gasoline. I know this is done for diesel, both to stablize it for burning at lower temperatures and to improve efficiency and performance, so it would seem perhaps this would positively affect gasoline engines as well. Probably a different ester (there are whole slews of them, they're a family of organic compounds that actually tend to smell very nice - look up a Wiki article on "ester" for much more).

I think this is not so much about a product that will lower the effective volatility of the gasoline mixture (which seems to be a lot of what the initial discussion / background over-simplification discussion seems to be about). Gas companies already add all sorts of things to improve volatility, and most modern cars (unless they're made in Britain it seems) don't have serious issues with lower-volatility fuels even in extreme heat (vapor lock), probably due to improved fuel pumps operating at higher pressures, as well as better fuel lines.

Also, I don't think the explanation that esters "break up" the "thick, heavy gasoline molecules" is entirely accurate - it's more of an explanation one would give to a child, and isn't really explaining much. I don't think esters are actually catalyzing the gasoline-oxygen chemical reactions as much as they are helping combust the initial byproducts of some of the first, or quickest combustion reactions that occur - overall, improving the combustion process to more simpler end products (reducing pollution, but actually increasing carbon dioxide output). This is what probably is reducing the so-called "engine wear" due to buildup as well as all the carbon black that's all over our exhaust pipes.

I have to be honest. I'm not entirely certain what's going on exactly with the esters being added, but I think it's probably some sort of reverse esterification reaction that affects some of the fuel and it's volatility. Esters can react to form alcohols that in turn burn "better" than some of the things in gasoline, as most people already know or have been told many times over ("ethanol added to improve fuel economy"). That apparently is part of the formulation, a smaller ester molecule (there are two, it appears) in this "Ethos" that improves full combustion of hydrocarbon molecules to the ultimate carbon dioxide, instead of carbon black that sticks to metal. The second ester molecule apparently helps reduce that "sticking" of carbon black to metals, and is apparently good for lubricity as well. (I love that word ... lubricity ... laugh.gif)

The timing of the multiple combustion reactions that occur is nothing short of superultramegacomplex. There are people at DOE laboratories (I've met a couple) that use some of the fastest supercomputers in the world to try to model all of the combustion reactions occurring in a few milliseconds in the cylinder of a combustion-chamber powered engine. It's seriously complicated shit, in other words. I've wanted to study the myriad of chemical reactions that occur in a cylinder, but I ain't that bright. And I don't have a a spare $billion or two to get the computer together I'd need. blink.gif

Some research online turned up a couple patent applications that helped me with the above, but nothing really all that knowledgeable except other references to this same product. I did come across some people trying acetone with some limited but similar results claimed by the ester guy. Acetone is not an ester, but a ketone - somewhat similar to esters in that it has oxygen double bonded to carbon, as esters do, but lacking the complexity of esters. It's a great solvent, as I'm sure many people here could vouch for.

Also, I found that esterification is an important part of stablizing biodiesel fuels, particularly for colder climates. So having esters in diesel is desirable. Perhaps something similar is occuring in a gasoline mixture - esters can be reacted to their "parent" alcohols. In fact, a process called "saponification" is where esters in fats (animal or plant) are converted to alcohols and acid salts (glycerol and fatty acids respectively in this case), making soap. Maybe that's how it cleans the engine. rolleyes.gif

- Nelson (waiting for new brake rotors, with time on his hands)

I'd have to be really concerned about using ketones of any derivitive in a 35+ year old, high-pressure fuel injected engine. Those ketones are not going to be very friendly to injector seals, fuel lines, intake seals, etc - you name it. Those of use with these old motors whose valve seals loved (and were designed for) leaded fuel have problems enough. Oh yeah, I'm sure that a squirt of acetone in the fuel would surely help de-carbon some interior components, but at what price?

Sorry, I know you aren't condoning the practice, just wanted to add my 2 cents. Oh, and don't get me wrong - I LOVE acetone. It's one of the best cleaning products out there. Also one the most explosive.

Be very, very careful with acetone. Used it for many years to dry lab glassware. How many of my brain cells were destroyed by it? What was the question? Oh yeah, '32 Packard. Catch my drift?
Pat
Rick L
Here's the bottom line...they want us to use the stuff to save money on gas. How 'bout some simple math?

$80 for 48oz = $1.66/oz (1oz/10 gal tank)

Avg price difference between regular and premium gas = 15 cents

0.15 x 10 gal = $1.50

I'll save my 16 cents, thank you!
(and I didn't count shipping costs!)

bs.gif confused24.gif KMA.gif

"momma may have raised an ugly child, but she didn't raise a stupid one!"
Brando
Rig it up to fire a shot of acetone through your cold start valve or something if you're aiming for a cheap octane boost/carbon cleaning.
Cap'n Krusty
To answer your original question: Yes, it could be for real. But it's not. The Cap'n
Elliot Cannon
QUOTE(jimtab @ May 3 2008, 01:14 AM) *

QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ May 2 2008, 06:34 PM) *

QUOTE(SirAndy @ May 2 2008, 12:09 PM) *

IMHO, anybody who ends a sentence/headline with " - Guaranteed" is lying ...

shades.gif Andy

PS: the whole ad sounds like one of them fake viagra webpages ...


VIAGRA IS FAKE!!!?????


See Elliot, like Dumbo's magic feather, and all this time you've been doing it by yourself....... biggrin.gif


DUMBOS MAGIC FEATHER WAS FAKE!!!!??????
Madswede
QUOTE(ericread @ May 2 2008, 08:28 PM) *

Snippo™ ... for windproof snippage.
SO... Can I replace my gas magnets with this or not?


Yeah sure. You could replace them things with your old dirty gym socks if you wanted. Probably notice several benefits right off the bat. biggrin.gif

- Nelson
ericread
GREAT STUFF av-943.gif

Can we put this to bed now??? yellowsleep[1].gif
zymurgist
Oh noes... the thread that just won't die.

Some friends sent me this, but I suspect that it is a load of BS as well. I'd love to hear opinions on this one...

http://www.runyourcarwithwater.com/?hop=watertt

Sounds like a waste of $50 to me.
SGB
A Regular $297 Value!

(click here to see our sale price) its $49.00

This sale expires on May 12th, 2008!


Oh no. Sale ends TOMORROW. I better order RIGHT NOW, before I think about it.
Dave_Darling
The short version: More snake oil.

--DD
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2024 Invision Power Services, Inc.