I'm not sure if the weight column includes the jack stands engine on bench.

I want one of those rare '72 2.0s, or perhaps a '73 1.8. With all the bogus info, these figures have no credibility.

was thinking the same thing

It's nice to see that 2.0 914's have passed the N/A 911 value in '75 and '76, but I think that most of us would prefer a '73 or '74 2.0 over a '75 or '76. Did you notice the value of an RS? Wow!

Its like they are encouraging us to crash out for the insurance....
C...R.A......Z................Y man!

I think the weight includes the jackstands since they are integral to the car.

Interesting how the values decrease for the 75/76 cars; must be the Rugged Rubber Baby Buggy Bumpers.

Actually that value may be a little low for a 73RS; I think most nowadays are fetching more than $200K even in this economy.

that's it! i'm putting my car on ebay for the 1973 excellent price of $19,650 as a buy it now!

and why is a 74 2.0 nearly 3 large more than a 73 2.0? inquiring minds want to know.....

Don't think the '74s are more sought after than the '73s, but hey I'm not gonna argue.

I bet the LE has somehow skewed the 74 value.

I like the fact the my 76 appearently weighs 100 pounds less then a 74, and about 20 pounds less then a 73.

ROCK ON!

Zach