jmill
Oct 16 2008, 01:02 PM
I've got a 73 17. and a 2.0. I can't afford a Raby 2270 now but until then I want the best bang I can get for the buck. A stock engine won't work for me. What is the cheapest way to upgrade without breaking the bank? Which block do I start with? I can toss about $2,000 at it. Can I build a stroker for that kind of money? Would I be better to build a small displacement rever? What p/c's do I go with? Thanks in advance guys.
Todd Enlund
Oct 16 2008, 01:14 PM
QUOTE(jmill @ Oct 16 2008, 11:02 AM)
I've got a 73 17. and a 2.0. I can't afford a Raby 2270 now but until then I want the best bang I can get for the buck. A stock engine won't work for me. What is the cheapest way to upgrade without breaking the bank? Which block do I start with? I can toss about $2,000 at it. Can I build a stroker for that kind of money? Would I be better to build a small displacement rever? What p/c's do I go with? Thanks in advance guys.
A stroker crank/rods/pistons would blow your budget... $1500 easy right there. Blocks are all the same. Use the 2.0 heads and crank. Get some 96mm pistons/cylinders and a new cam/lifters, and build a 2056. Get new bearings. Put money into machine work on the crank, rods and heads. Expect $600-$1000 to rebuild the heads alone. Make sure they repair the cracks and threads.
Pistons/cylinders - $300-$400
cam - $150-$200
lifters - $100-$150
bearings - $100
Machine work - $1000
Use the rest of your budget on gaskets and other small parts.
This is off the top of my head, and I'm far from an expert... I may have overlooked something important
Chris Hamilton
Oct 16 2008, 01:15 PM
As far as I have seen, the best bang for your buck would be a 1.8 motor made into a 2.0, or a 2.0 with ported heads, valve springs, longer connecting rods, a good pair of carburetors and webcam's "Ultimate street cam". You can stick with the stock cam, but above about 6,000rpm the engine isn't going to want to rev like with the webcam.
edit: woah, $2000 budget? that might be a problem
orange914
Oct 16 2008, 02:24 PM
$2000... not gonna happen with a type IV. maybe if you've been into them for sometime and have parts laying around or if you shop around and score some 96mm's or webers cheap. it can be done i guess but if you knew exactly what you wanted and fell into a few big ticket items for cheap. you'd be best off to find a members slightly used 2056, they do come up. or just stick the 2k away for the one you really want.
mike
davep
Oct 16 2008, 03:06 PM
With that kind of a budget, I'd do much as I am doing:
have Len Hoffman rebuild the 2.0 heads
use a Raby 9550 cam, matching lifters, and cam gear if using D-jet
use high compression pistons
toon1
Oct 16 2008, 03:18 PM
Are both the 1.7 and 2.0 in running condition?
Why won't a stock engine work?
put the 2.0 in, and call it a day. Save the money you would have spent on a an engine rebuild that is not your #1 desire and put it towards a 2270.
The 2056 is the most bang for the buck and should be able to be built for 2K. (that's cutting it close)
Todd Enlund
Oct 16 2008, 03:26 PM
QUOTE(orange914 @ Oct 16 2008, 12:24 PM)
$2000... not gonna happen with a type IV. maybe if you've been into them for sometime and have parts laying around or if you shop around and score some 96mm's or webers cheap. it can be done i guess but if you knew exactly what you wanted and fell into a few big ticket items for cheap. you'd be best off to find a members slightly used 2056, they do come up. or just stick the 2k away for the one you really want.
mike
I think it could be done... but I assumed that induction/ignition/exhaust were not included in the budget.
Some quick shopping:
96mm AA Piston/cylinder set on eBay - $259
Web #86b - $150
Web Cam Gear - $35
Web Lifters - $140
Main/Rod/Cam Bearings - $62
Gaskets/Seals - $92
$738
Machine work estimates:
Mag & Grind crank $200
Recondition rods $100
Valve job/seats/guides $600
$900
That leaves $362 for valves, springs, nuts, bolts, whatever.
For $150 over the cost of the Web cam and lifters, you could get a Raby basic valvetrain and a set of chromoly pushrods, use the 1.7 rockers, and still have $200 for other stuff.
This also assumes that between the 1.7 and the 2.0 there are enough re-usable ancillary parts to make the build work... oil cooler, etc.
Am I way off? If induction is needed, add a set of ICTs for $400, or a used set of IDFs for $600. Over budget, but still not bad...
Admittedly, it will not be the highest quality build that the world has ever seen... but it would beat the crap out of sitting on jackstands.
I'm tempted to go this route myself just to get my car on the road, and then continue to build my 2258 as a replacement. We'll see what the springtime brings...
SirAndy
Oct 16 2008, 03:48 PM
QUOTE(jmill @ Oct 16 2008, 11:02 AM)
I've got a 73 17. and a 2.0. I can't afford a Raby 2270 now but until then I want the best bang I can get for the buck. A stock engine won't work for me. What is the cheapest way to upgrade without breaking the bank? Which block do I start with? I can toss about $2,000 at it. Can I build a stroker for that kind of money? Would I be better to build a small displacement rever? What p/c's do I go with? Thanks in advance guys.
Use the 2.0L as a core and make it a 2056. If you don't have a set of 44 webers, you can go a bit milder on the cam and use the 2.0L D-Jet on it. Or even the 1.7L D-Jet.
Either way, it's still gonna be way more fun than a stock 2.0L and won't break your bank ...
Andy
jmill
Oct 16 2008, 05:14 PM
You were right Todd thats 2k just for the engine. Both engines run. They both have FI. I'm going to go with 44's. The stock engines are not quite peppy enough for me. I'm out of touch on part suppliers and machinists. Where's the best place to send the heads and buy p/c's?
Cap'n Krusty
Oct 16 2008, 05:28 PM
I have two sets of typically used 2.0 heads at the machine shop right now. Both engines ran fine, but had a lot of miles on 'em. Both had been done before.
MY COST, welding, seats, guides, stud and hole repairs, and surfacing, but NOT including valves or springs, $1500/set. The days of $600 cylinder head rebuilds are long gone for T4 heads .................
The Cap'n
Todd Enlund
Oct 16 2008, 05:37 PM
QUOTE(jmill @ Oct 16 2008, 03:14 PM)
You were right Todd thats 2k just for the engine. Both engines run. They both have FI. I'm going to go with 44's. The stock engines are not quite peppy enough for me. I'm out of touch on part suppliers and machinists. Where's the best place to send the heads and buy p/c's?
Best and
cheapest are not going to be the same place
Cheapest 96mm pistons/cylinders I've seen are the AA set on eBay. For the rest, shop type4store.com, aircooled.net, europeanmotorworks.com, webcamshaft.com...
For machine work... ask around local if you want cheap. If you want best... you'll pay more, and pay shipping. I plan on sending my heads to Len Hoffman, and having the crank done locally.
904svo
Oct 16 2008, 05:52 PM
Talk to Jake, ever now and then some body backs out of a engine build. Jake
will sell that engine for the remainer of the balance on that engine. But your
money in the bank and keep adding to it soon you will have enought to get
your dream engine.
jmill
Oct 17 2008, 07:34 AM
Thanks for all the info guys. I think I know what direction to head and who to call to get there. Looks like a 2056 with h/c pistons and send the heads to Len. Your right about the heads Capt. Thats going to take up most of my budget.
carr914
Oct 17 2008, 08:02 AM
Run the existing engines and save your money till you can do it right. Otherwise you're just throwing the money away.
T.C.
Mark Henry
Oct 17 2008, 08:16 AM
Guys wanting engines done on the cheap is just another reason I'm quitting building engines and working on VW/porsches.
My rep resting on a POS rebuild just isn't worth the hassle.
Going back to cabinets, women are way more picky, but they have no problem paying for what they want.
jmill
Oct 17 2008, 02:51 PM
Sorry to hear your getting out of the engine business Mark. If I was tripping over 5g's it would be a different story. Unfortunately, I'm not. I'll have to take my 2 nickles and do what I can with them. If that's a POS rebuild so be it.
sww914
Oct 17 2008, 05:11 PM
I think that here can be a happy balance between less expensive and perfect.
Everyone who tells you that every piece inside the engine should be brand new or reconditioned is right. It is better to renew everything every time. That said, I will never spend $10,000.00 on a goddamned VW Van motor.
Tolerances exist to determine how worn a given part is and when it should be replaced. The very finest parts will last longer, be more reliable and build more power. That's not the question. The real question is how much can you spend and is it enough to build an engine that will work for you. For 2K you can almost get it done. The big variable is the heads. If all these heads have cracks then all the cars running around have cracked heads. What fails? What are the failures?
My car has been running cracked heads for 9 years. I expected it to last a season or two, I didn't have another grand to throw at the heads right then.
It is possible to touch up the valves and seats, replace the guides if they need it, replace the springs if you're going to rev it or add a big cam and run it. Buy some Weber 44's, a cam and lifters, some 96's, bearings and gaskets and build an engine. Will it be as good or last as long? Hell no!
Will it be good enough? Probably.
749142
Oct 18 2008, 12:44 AM
Well, with my experience i built a couple 2056s and one 1.9 liter. the 1.9 had 2.0 heads with 96mm pistons on the 1.8 stroke. get some lighter rods, higher performance cam, exhuast, and go with a freer breathing intake. with the lighter rods that combo would be able to rev a lot better. my 1.9 had stock rods cam etc, however it stomped the crap out of the 2056s i built. why, the shorter stroke likes the higher rpm better, the 2056s pulled up until about 4800rpm. the 1.9 pulled all the way to redline even with a stock cam. all it had was a modified exhaust. i used that exhaust on both combos but found the 1.9 to pull harder in the higher rpms and it still had good low end pull. theoretically if you were to keep the 1.9 together at higher rpms it would produce more power if you revved it higher than redline and had the right parts to hold it together.my 2 cents.
sww914, must have had some really used up old parts. ive put together quite a bit of motors using old parts, did the old parts make them fail. no! a couple of them lasted 6-8 years and were pulled out in good running order only to be replaced by something with more power.if your parts dont have too many miles on them re use them youll save money, but remember to get the basics like new bearings, seals, gaskets, etc. and youl have pretty dependable engine.
sww914
Oct 18 2008, 01:06 AM
749142, I agree with you. The point of my whole post is that one can build an engine that is less than perfect parts, ie used or less expensive and have it be a good engine.
DBCooper
Oct 18 2008, 07:02 AM
You're right. When you build your own engines you can think that way, and that's the big advantage of having the skills to do it yourself. Key there is YOU can do it. But when you're building engines for other people profits aren't so big that you can afford to ever have a failure.
sww914
Oct 18 2008, 01:01 PM
That's why I don't scuff & squirt people's cars. When you're getting paid to do something for someone it's easy for them to say that it will be good enough when they're thinking about dollars but when they see the results they're less happy.
749142
Oct 19 2008, 12:59 AM
sww914. thats true. i thought you were saying never use old parts. ive never built engines for others or had them built for me but i see your point. you can get good service out of used parts, being that they are in good condition, but there are cases when new parts are best. although some new parts arent always best being that they are under developed and under tested. im currently int the process of building a 2056 with a mild cam and extensively ported 2.0l heads, and a custom dual exhuast.
using some old parts though. crank, rods, cam. the crank is almost perfect, like its not been run but about 15k miles. looks almost untouched, and its not ground.
Jake Raby
Oct 19 2008, 11:34 AM
More skill is required when building an engine with unknown or used parts. The inspection of old parts and identifying the issues that are critical is the key.
This is why guys with zero experience are the absolute best engine kit assemblers.. Just follow the video and bolt it together.
I put together the engine in my 912E with 85% used parts, only replacing the cam, lifters, bearings and valves with brand new parts. Most of the old stuff came from the original engine and my stash of parts from test engines that had failed in some way and still had other good parts left inside them.
That was 145K miles ago.
azbill
Oct 19 2008, 06:37 PM
QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Oct 19 2008, 10:34 AM)
More skill is required when building an engine with unknown or used parts. The inspection of old parts and identifying the issues that are critical is the key.
This is why guys with zero experience are the absolute best engine kit assemblers.. Just follow the video and bolt it together.
I put together the engine in my 912E with 85% used parts, only replacing the cam, lifters, bearings and valves with brand new parts. Most of the old stuff came from the original engine and my stash of parts from test engines that had failed in some way and still had other good parts left inside them.
That was 145K miles ago.
Now tell us how many engines you built be the one in the 912. Jake is right, don't skimp on the parts. Live with what you have, save your money and do ti right or don't do it.
Jake Raby
Oct 19 2008, 06:53 PM
QUOTE
Now tell us how many engines you built be the one in the 912
I have no idea!
jmill
Oct 20 2008, 08:04 AM
It can be done right without breaking the bank. I got a different take on Jakes post. What I think Jake was saying is that identifying which parts are good and which aren't is the key. If a part is still within spec why buy a replacement? The key here is actually recognizing what is good and what is bad. That takes some skill. I've seen engines filled with brand new goodies grenade shortly after startup. I believe an engines longevity is based more on the engine builder than the parts. I wont know how much I need to spend until I crack the cases and see what I have. If all is good I might actually get away cheaper. If not I'll save my nickels for the Raby 2270.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.