QUOTE(r_towle @ Mar 21 2009, 11:32 AM)
Maybe its me (shut up Scotty) but if I was to put flares on a car, and I knew that the flared rocker was ALWAYS in a fixed position....based upon the jack post, I would get the rocker cover before I measured and mocked up the flares.
The flares can move, the rocker cannot move.
The rocker is a certain fixed length...
Why do people always complain that the rocker does not fit there specific car...
There is no way to put the flares on and have them match an unknown rocker aside from sheer dumb luck.
Aside from that, I expect any fiberglass part to need sanding and prep prior to paint...you get what you pay for on those parts.
Rich
...I agree on one side of the issue and disagree on the other.
As far as my jack post position (on the car) being fixed, I would agree. Mine was within 3.17 mm from left to right. If one has a problem after replacing the jack post during a restoration, the hole in the rocker can be moved to accomodate the position. I wanted to place the steel flares based on hub centers and split the dimension of the opening in the flare.
My assumption was that the dimensions, from left to right, would be within .125, hopefully, and that the rockers were mirror image of each other. That assumption was incorrect.
Prior to all of this, I made a dimensionally square layout in solidworks and ran a tolerance study of the individual parts. I had the numbers before I started the fit check. My irritation was the numbers were, consistantly, not falling where they should have.
After three attempts to find the error in either my calcuations, or the deviations in the car, or the components.
The other incorrect assumption, on my part, was that the new front valance was dimensionally the same as the original. It was not.
The new part was beautiful, square, and manufactured better. It was thicker in section.
I found the deviation in the newer valance after I placed the original valance into position and screwed it into place. I aligned the passenger side steel flares with the original LE valance and then positioned the GT rocker covers into place. I was delighted to find that the rear flare fell within my original marks based on hub center.
I then went to the driver's side and did the same thing, and the driver's side fell within .125 of the original marks again.
Comparing notes against the installation versus the nominal data. I found that the car is not square.
I don't trust manufactured parts by nature. I deal with acceptance/rejection criteria everyday. Everything falls within zones of tolerance, diametrically, projection and planer, giving intermating part fit.
Sometimes we are so smart, that we're stupid.
My new rule on the 914, and the 911 for that matter, is make no assumptions.
This only convinced me that the car is organic in nature. From one car to the other, they may look like a toaster on wheels and similar in that fashion, but at the detail level they are different in all respects.
I am not an expert, I just have my own ways of doing things. Validation of my own thinking doesn't mean I'm smart. It just means that I'm aligned with the data.
I want to thank everyone who has communicated in this. It's like having all of you guys in my garage, sharing ideas and sweating the details.
I know once my car is finished, it will be a rolling example of all of our shared efforts. Each with its' own story of recreation.
Dave