QUOTE(Tom_T @ Sep 21 2009, 12:24 PM)
QUOTE(gothspeed @ Sep 21 2009, 12:12 PM)
Is there any reason this would not work with a 1.7 D-Jet??
I would think that the pick-up points on the board would be different on the 1.7 version, in order to match the throttle's performance profile of the smaller engine.
Maybe Dave could elaborate &/or do one for the 1.7 D-Jet.........?
This exact topic arose over on the other site. Here is my answer:
The circuit trace serrations on the TPS board act as triggers for additional fuel delivery. This additional fuel functions to reduce the lean excursion (and resulting torque drop) that occurs on a throttle tip-in transient. (Much like the accelerator pump on your Holley 750, remember those?)
The late 1.7 boards and the 2.0 boards are functionally identical:
1. They each have 18 serrations.
2. The serrations are spaced 3 degrees apart.
3. The serrations take up roughly 54 degrees of throttle rotation, or roughly 65% of the total throttle travel.
4. The serrations start from the idle position.
BUT, here is the key difference in the 1.7 and 2.0 boards -- the throttles rotate different directions. This means (by point 4 in the list above) that if you mis-match the board with the throttle, you will have serrations that are in the 35%-100% throttle region, rather than in the 0% to 65% region. You'll be missing the fuel in the throttle region where lean transients are most sensitive. Clearly not what Porsche intended.
But will it work? Yeah, sorry, I don't know that. It won't be great, but maybe better than nothing? Here's where experimentation trumps theory. Book learnin' vs street smarts. Try it and see...
Or you could wait until we get the 1.7 boards done. Maybe a month or so.