Tale of the dyno, It's SuperTrapp over Magna Flow |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Tale of the dyno, It's SuperTrapp over Magna Flow |
drew365 |
Jul 25 2003, 03:58 PM
Post
#1
|
These are the good old days! Group: Members Posts: 2,004 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Sunny So. Cal. Member No.: 37 |
I dyno'd my car today. We did three pulls and the end results are SuperTrapps with 15 disks gave the most h.p., Magna Flow's were second and SuperTrapps with no disks was the weakest combo. Here's the numbers:
SuperTrapps w/ 15 disks: 196.5 h.p. @ 6600rpm Torque 165.4 @ 5200rpm Magna Flows: 188.6 h.p. @ 6450 rpm Torque 165.8 @ 5200 rpm SuperTrapps w/ no disks: 186.8 h.p. @ 6600 rpm Torque 162.7 @ 5250 rpm Air fuel ratio was about 14.7:1 with the SuperTrapps. Is this too lean? I screwed up and forgot to put some racing gas in the tank before I left the house so all the results are using 91 pump fuel. |
seanery |
Jul 25 2003, 04:07 PM
Post
#2
|
waiting to rebuild whitey! Group: Retired Admin Posts: 15,852 Joined: 7-January 03 From: Indy Member No.: 100 Region Association: None |
you have a 2.7, right? any mods? headers?
|
Brad Roberts |
Jul 25 2003, 04:09 PM
Post
#3
|
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 19,148 Joined: 23-December 02 Member No.: 8 Region Association: None |
Why did the MagnaFlow pulls stop at 6450 instead of 6600 like the other two pulls ??
B |
drew365 |
Jul 25 2003, 04:30 PM
Post
#4
|
These are the good old days! Group: Members Posts: 2,004 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Sunny So. Cal. Member No.: 37 |
The engine is a twin plug, electromotive crankfire ignition, 11.5:1 Mahle pistons, S cam, stainless steel headers w/o heater crap.
We ran all the dyno's to 7k. The rpm that I posted is where the h.p. peaked. It stayed pretty level from peak to 7k. |
garyh |
Jul 25 2003, 04:47 PM
Post
#5
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 170 Joined: 8-January 03 From: San Mateo, CA Member No.: 114 |
QUOTE(drew365 @ Jul 25 2003, 01:58 PM) Air fuel ratio was about 14.7:1 with the SuperTrapps. Is this too lean? 14.7 is minimum emissions. 13.2 is maximum power |
Jeroen |
Jul 25 2003, 05:21 PM
Post
#6
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 7,887 Joined: 24-December 02 From: The Netherlands Member No.: 3 Region Association: Europe |
The max torque is pretty high up in the rpm range. How's the torque curve?
Can you post the graphs from the dyno? cheers, Jeroen |
drew365 |
Jul 25 2003, 05:47 PM
Post
#7
|
These are the good old days! Group: Members Posts: 2,004 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Sunny So. Cal. Member No.: 37 |
I'll try to scan the graphs and post them over the weekend. I'll have to request time on my wifes scanner. The torque bottoms at about 139 @ 4600 rpm and climbs to 165 @ 5250 rpm and then starts to slowly drop off.
|
TimT |
Jul 25 2003, 07:13 PM
Post
#8
|
retired Group: Members Posts: 4,033 Joined: 18-February 03 From: Wantagh, NY Member No.: 313 |
flat torque curve is cool.... you would prefer a rising torque curve, but you dont want a torque curve that peaks then falls to zero.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer.gif)
|
ChrisReale |
Jul 25 2003, 10:08 PM
Post
#9
|
Sleazy Group: Members Posts: 2,665 Joined: 20-January 03 From: San Francisco Member No.: 176 |
QUOTE(drew365 @ Jul 25 2003, 04:47 PM) . The torque bottoms at about 139 @ 4600 rpm Poor you! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) Just kidding. How loud is the Supertrapp with fifteen disks? |
Qarl |
Jul 25 2003, 10:10 PM
Post
#10
|
Shriveled member Group: Benefactors Posts: 5,233 Joined: 8-February 03 From: Florida Member No.: 271 Region Association: None |
Schweet dude... and that's rear wheel horsepower too.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/boldblue.gif)
Wonder what the power is at the flywheel? Woohoo! |
Joe Bob |
Jul 25 2003, 10:37 PM
Post
#11
|
Retired admin, banned a few times Group: Members Posts: 17,427 Joined: 24-December 02 From: Boulder CO Member No.: 5 Region Association: None |
Interesting,,,,,I always thought I had less oomph all around with no discs....thought I was going or getting MORE bonkers.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)
|
Jeroen |
Jul 26 2003, 04:42 AM
Post
#12
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 7,887 Joined: 24-December 02 From: The Netherlands Member No.: 3 Region Association: Europe |
QUOTE(mikez @ Jul 26 2003, 06:37 AM) Interesting,,,,,I always thought I had less oomph all around with no discs....thought I was going or getting MORE bonkers.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) Mikey, that does make sense... compared to a stock setup Lack of backpressure will cause a drop in torque in the lower rpm range (which is where you experience the "oomph") cheers, Jeroen |
drew365 |
Jul 26 2003, 08:47 AM
Post
#13
|
These are the good old days! Group: Members Posts: 2,004 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Sunny So. Cal. Member No.: 37 |
I recounted the SuperTrapp disks now that they are off the car and there are 18. The sound in the upper rpm range is nice but it is much quieter than the Magna Flows are. On the street the Magna Flows set off alarms constantly, good cheap thrill.
|
Joe Bob |
Jul 26 2003, 09:38 AM
Post
#14
|
Retired admin, banned a few times Group: Members Posts: 17,427 Joined: 24-December 02 From: Boulder CO Member No.: 5 Region Association: None |
The guy that built my 3.6 conversion claimed an extra 8 hp w/o discs on the dyno. Iwas unable to feel any diff when running un corked. That's why I made that comment.
There is LOUD and too fucking loud......I would rather hear my shifts than have to wear earplugs on the track and watch the tach ALL the time.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif) |
drew365 |
Jul 26 2003, 05:15 PM
Post
#15
|
These are the good old days! Group: Members Posts: 2,004 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Sunny So. Cal. Member No.: 37 |
I'll see if I scanned the graphs right so they can be posted. The first is SuperTrapps with the recounted 18 disks. The guy printed a test run and the first run together so that's why there's double lines. The air / fuel ratio didn't pickup on this one through the disks.
Attached thumbnail(s) |
drew365 |
Jul 26 2003, 05:17 PM
Post
#16
|
These are the good old days! Group: Members Posts: 2,004 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Sunny So. Cal. Member No.: 37 |
What do you know, it worked. The second is SuperTrapps with no disks.
Attached thumbnail(s) |
drew365 |
Jul 26 2003, 05:18 PM
Post
#17
|
These are the good old days! Group: Members Posts: 2,004 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Sunny So. Cal. Member No.: 37 |
Third pull was with the Magna Flow mufflers.
Attached thumbnail(s) |
drew365 |
Jul 28 2003, 06:05 PM
Post
#18
|
These are the good old days! Group: Members Posts: 2,004 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Sunny So. Cal. Member No.: 37 |
Can someone tell me by looking at the second and third graphs what my air / fuel ratio is? I don't know if it's the peak which appears to be about 14.7:1 or an average. Just trying to figure out if my carbs could be dialed in better. Thanks.
|
TimT |
Jul 28 2003, 06:47 PM
Post
#19
|
retired Group: Members Posts: 4,033 Joined: 18-February 03 From: Wantagh, NY Member No.: 313 |
Those graphs look pretty good.
what rpm and gear were you doing the pulls from? looks like things get rich around 4000rpm then hover around stoi from 400+ too rich at 4000 then safe at 5000+ you could use a touch smaller main jet, and a different emulsion tube. This is a case were I wouldnt use a 125 instead of a 130 main jet, I would ream a 125 till i got the power that is available. (dont know if your using 130's its just an example) |
drew365 |
Jul 28 2003, 07:14 PM
Post
#20
|
These are the good old days! Group: Members Posts: 2,004 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Sunny So. Cal. Member No.: 37 |
Thanks for the advice Tim; all the pulls were done in 3rd gear except the original test run was in 2nd. A weber guru set up the carbs so I could run the Virginia City Hillclimb last year and they haven't been changed since. I believe he set them pretty lean since the hillclimb is at 8,000ft. I'm not sure what size main's he put in but I seem to remember 150's being mentioned.
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th May 2024 - 01:58 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |