Front bumper rubber tops - Fully erect, I mean with internal support, It has come to my attention that you may want a change Options

[Mikey914]

As many of you know I've been reproducing the the front bumper tops for some time. It has come to my attention that some folks thought that they should have an internal support like the rears I make.

When I set out to make these I did make some changes to the original design. The originals used a foam rubber as most of you know, and because the foam rubber would not hold up well in shipping and handling, and because it needed a solid structure to mount a steel insert was made to do this. We all know how well this combination worked out if you live in a wet climate.

When I made my version I decided to use a solid rubber,this allowed me to use a stainless steel "anchor point" for the attachment of the bumper. This the bumper is "floppy" when not installed. I felt that because the bumper top was being mounted to a large piece of steel that the internal support was redundant.

What I want to know is is it worth the extra $35 to put the internal stainless support in to the bumper?

I have just brought in 2000# of material and have the production line running again. As I make my own stuff I could make up some internal supports to include in the bumpers.

This also poses another question. As I'm back in full production, I will be lowering prices significantly, much greater that $35 per bumper. Would you rather take the $75 savings or do a net $40?

Please provide some input as I can easily make the change, but as you know I have tried to provide what I thought was the best product at the best price.

Your feedback is greatly appreciated

[realred914]

As many of you know I've been reproducing the the front bumper tops for some time. It has come to my attention that some folks thought that they should have an internal support like the rears I make.

When I set out to make these I did make some changes to the original design. The originals used a foam rubber as most of you know, and because the foam rubber would not hold up well in shipping and handling, and because it needed a solid structure to mount a steel insert was made to do this. We all know how well this combination worked out if you live in a wet climate.

When I made my version I decided to use a solid rubber,this allowed me to use a stainless steel "anchor point" for the attachment of the bumper. This the bumper is "floppy" when not installed. I felt that because the bumper top was being mounted to a large piece of steel that the internal support was redundant.

What I want to know is is it worth the extra $35 to put the internal stainless support in to the bumper?

I have just brought in 2000# of material and have the production line running again. As I make my own stuff I could make up some internal supports to include in the bumpers.

This also poses another question. As I'm back in full production, I will be lowering prices significantly, much greater that $35 per bumper. Would you rather take the $75 savings or do a net $45?

Please provide some input as I can easily make the change, but as you know I have tried to provide what I thought was the best product at the best price.

Your feedback is greatly appreciated

well the stainless I would pay extra for, my question is how much are teh bumper pads? didn't see that in your post.


thanks for helping out the 914's

[dr914@autoatlanta.com]

yes yes yes! That was always my complaint. We applaud you for commiting to make all of these 914 parts Mark, but to make them like the originals is always best especially for us concours weenies!
Put the aluminum in the bumper top and firm it up! No limp bumper tops expect the worn rusted ones anymore!

As many of you know I've been reproducing the the front bumper tops for some time. It has come to my attention that some folks thought that they should have an internal support like the rears I make.

When I set out to make these I did make some changes to the original design. The originals used a foam rubber as most of you know, and because the foam rubber would not hold up well in shipping and handling, and because it needed a solid structure to mount a steel insert was made to do this. We all know how well this combination worked out if you live in a wet climate.

When I made my version I decided to use a solid rubber,this allowed me to use a stainless steel "anchor point" for the attachment of the bumper. This the bumper is "floppy" when not installed. I felt that because the bumper top was being mounted to a large piece of steel that the internal support was redundant.

What I want to know is is it worth the extra $35 to put the internal stainless support in to the bumper?

I have just brought in 2000# of material and have the production line running again. As I make my own stuff I could make up some internal supports to include in the bumpers.

This also poses another question. As I'm back in full production, I will be lowering prices significantly, much greater that $35 per bumper. Would you rather take the $75 savings or do a net $45?

Please provide some input as I can easily make the change, but as you know I have tried to provide what I thought was the best product at the best price.

Your feedback is greatly appreciated

[rick 918-S]

Your offering us an improved product with a stainless reinforcement AND a $ 45.00 lower price? Sounds like a win/win to me. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

[FlatIV]

If it is not an actual improvement, I think it is goofy to change it......

Andrew

[Mikey914]

Maybe I misjudged the product, and that was what I was trying to figure out.
I have these and these sets listed on the website, but the price difference for the front is $35 with the internal stainless part.
So you'd be looking at $334 shipped instead of $299 shipped.

If there are those that want it, I can easily put it in. My problem is that I'm basically cheap. I will do something the most cost effective way I can, unless it affects the quality of the part, and if I can eliminate a nonessential redundancy I will.

From what I'm hearing here, there are at least a few of you that may want the additional internal support?

[Mikey914]

Your offering us an improved product with a stainless reinforcement AND a $ 45.00 lower price? Sounds like a win/win to me. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

It's actually an increase, but as I had lowered the prices it would be a decrease.

[Tom_T]

As many of you know I've been reproducing the the front bumper tops for some time. It has come to my attention that some folks thought that they should have an internal support like the rears I make.

When I set out to make these I did make some changes to the original design. The originals used a foam rubber as most of you know, and because the foam rubber would not hold up well in shipping and handling, and because it needed a solid structure to mount a steel insert was made to do this. We all know how well this combination worked out if you live in a wet climate.

When I made my version I decided to use a solid rubber,this allowed me to use a stainless steel "anchor point" for the attachment of the bumper. This the bumper is "floppy" when not installed. I felt that because the bumper top was being mounted to a large piece of steel that the internal support was redundant.

What I want to know is is it worth the extra $35 to put the internal stainless support in to the bumper?

I have just brought in 2000# of material and have the production line running again. As I make my own stuff I could make up some internal supports to include in the bumpers.

This also poses another question. As I'm back in full production, I will be lowering prices significantly, much greater that $35 per bumper. Would you rather take the $75 savings or do a net $45?

Please provide some input as I can easily make the change, but as you know I have tried to provide what I thought was the best product at the best price.

Your feedback is greatly appreciated

Hey Mark, I have an early one still packaged, but would pay the upcharge & swap if you make them with the support - if you can swap (it's still in your shipping package with the rear topper in my garage)?? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)

Otherwise, if I were buying now, I'd opt for the support at $45 less - or even $35 more - IMHO.

[markb]

Yes, add the support. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[mepstein]

I would want the support. (but might not buy for a while) Thanks, Mark

[montoya 73 2.0]

Add the support. Offering a better product than before is always good.

[bandjoey]

If I needed one - don't now - I'd go with the insert.
What I need is a good fitting front trunk seal now. I'll have to get one from XXX (insert name) before going to Musr. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)

[Niklas]

Hi Mark!

What is the freight to Sweden for :

914 early front and rear bumper rubber package


Niklas

[McMark]

I would want the support. The motivation would be that over the next 10-15 years we MIGHT notice some very slight bowing, warping or tweaking. I think the added support would help eliminate that possibility and I'd GLADLY pay $35 for some peace-of-mind.

[Niklas]

Yes support for a long life.


Niklas

[Nürburg Nomad]

I would want the support. The motivation would be that over the next 10-15 years we MIGHT notice some very slight bowing, warping or tweaking. I think the added support would help eliminate that possibility and I'd GLADLY pay $35 for some peace-of-mind.

Very well put... my 914Rubber bumper tops (Produced/Installed April 2010) look great installed and are so far holding up exceptionally well as I expected them too but yes $35.00 is well justified to futher enhance the rigidity of the bumper tops for long term peace of mind.

When you consider most of us teeners intend to keep our cars indefinitely plus those in the Euro market already have to pay additional freight costs $$$ $35 additional makes sense to get the best product possible. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/first.gif)

[JRust]

Yes add the Stainless!

[Jacob]

I see that the consensus is for the stainless support. But I can see that since you are using a solid rubber as opposed to the original foam rubber that it might be redundant. Over the years I have learned that when it comes to consumer products "perception is everything" apparently the perception is that an extra strip of stainless is worth the extra money. I would be happy with the switch to solid rubber since I don't think the bumper will move much and you are using superior material.

[computers4kids]

Your feedback is greatly appreciated

My 2 cents...
From my experience with your front bumpers, it seems they are made very well, but if it's possible I would suggest some sort of stainless inside the corners of the bumper tops. If you could make the corner stay in the shape of our bumpers, that would be great. I know you mentioned that the bumper tops are still curing even when strapped to the board that you ship them on. I know the first top I bought the corners were way out of shape, and the replacement one was still off but not enough to worry about it. As far as adding steel inside the run along the bumper...not necessary.

Once again, great workmanship.

[Gint]

I guess I'm in the minority. I don't see the need for it. And at the price you're offering these units if they last and look good for 10 years and then collapse after 10 years 1 month I'm still going to be really pleased. And ready to buy another!