Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> OT: Best Linux Distrubution, Red Hat or SUSE
thomasotten
post Oct 5 2004, 09:35 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,546
Joined: 16-November 03
From: San Antonio, Texas
Member No.: 1,349



I am looking at upgrading our Linux workstations at work. We run Redhat 7.0 right now, and would normally just upgrade to the latest Red Hat but now they charge $$ now for the OS, which used to be a free download. I am considering SUSE Linux as well. We use Linux as a technical desktop in an engineering firm, and I also use it to run application servers like Tomcat and other Java apps. Any recommendations?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Oct 5 2004, 09:54 PM
Post #2


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



The only thing "official" you can get from RedHat now is the Enterprise server. The desktop stuff has been dropped. Fedora is their free "experimental" version, which (I believe) still has the desktop stuff. However, from every report I've heard, Fedora has all kinds of problems.

I'm still running RH 9.0, which is the last "free" desktop version they delivered. Much better than 7.0, esp. for desktop stuff.

I'm facing a similar decision soon myself, and will probably go to Slackware for servers. Old and familiar to me. For desktop, I haven't a clue what to tell you.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mikey
post Oct 5 2004, 09:56 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 423
Joined: 30-January 03
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 214
Region Association: None



I use Fedora Core 2 at home. Not sure if there are restrictions that would prevent you from using it in a business environment. If there are SuSE would be a good choice.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thomasotten
post Oct 5 2004, 10:03 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,546
Joined: 16-November 03
From: San Antonio, Texas
Member No.: 1,349



Well Red Hat does have "Enterprise Workstation", so they do have a non-server product. But it starts at $179. SUSE is $89. We also run VMWare for access to Windows, so you can see that the costs start to add up to set up a single system.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ThinAir
post Oct 5 2004, 10:53 PM
Post #5


Best friends
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,543
Joined: 4-February 03
From: Flagstaff, AZ
Member No.: 231
Region Association: Southwest Region



SuSe is gonna charge you also. Personally, I use Xandros. Yes they charge for it, but it installs very easily and works great for people to are coming from Windows. I've never managed to be successful with SuSe and had only limited success with Mandrake. I also like the fact that Xandros is based upon Debian which has the best package management stuff around.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Oct 5 2004, 11:04 PM
Post #6


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,669
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



freeBSD is still free ...

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ThinAir
post Oct 5 2004, 11:06 PM
Post #7


Best friends
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,543
Joined: 4-February 03
From: Flagstaff, AZ
Member No.: 231
Region Association: Southwest Region



I forgot - Xandros now has a free edition that you can download. The Business Edition comes with Crossover Office so if you need to run Windoze programs you get a lot for your money.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fiid
post Oct 6 2004, 12:50 AM
Post #8


Turbo Megasquirted Subaru Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,827
Joined: 7-April 03
From: San Francisco, CA
Member No.: 530
Region Association: Northern California



I am running Fedora Core 2. I have not seen any serious reasons to use anything else. When RedHat dropped "support" for RH9 and went to Fedora, I tried Debian, and it sucked. Core is nice, and has an excellent package manager/update tool called yum. This should be the last upgrade you have to reinstall for. I reinstalled my server in a weekend. Did a little config work, and nearly all the software I needed I installed with "yum install foo" or "yum install andyPhotoFuzzifier".

It mostly comes down to what you are used to though - all the distros put stuff in different places. I happen to know all the redhat config directory structures inside out, and like working with RPM and yum, so Core works best for me. Feel free to IM or email me if I can help at all with getting your setup running.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fiid
post Oct 6 2004, 12:51 AM
Post #9


Turbo Megasquirted Subaru Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,827
Joined: 7-April 03
From: San Francisco, CA
Member No.: 530
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Oct 5 2004, 09:04 PM)
freeBSD is still free ...

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Andy

NetBSD and OpenBSD are free too.

There is a rumour that Oracle for Linux is quicker under Linux emulation on FreeBSD than it is on linux. I think that was prior to linux 2.4 though.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sechszylinder
post Oct 6 2004, 02:24 AM
Post #10


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 247
Joined: 9-April 03
From: /earth/europe/germany/berlin
Member No.: 545
Region Association: None



hilow,

I'm running RH 9.0 which I upgraded to the newest 2.6 kernel. very stable, but you have to install
most of the software from different sources (in my opinion the best way to have an up to date system).

Fedora is based on the latest rh distibution, features the latest kernel and is free of charge ...

As you might guess , i hate the suse distributions ...

Benno

greetings from old europe (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_flagge6.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
anthony
post Oct 6 2004, 09:45 AM
Post #11


2270 club
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 3,107
Joined: 1-February 03
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Member No.: 218



QUOTE
a technical desktop in an engineering firm


How about a dual 2.5ghz Apple G5? I love OSX. It's easy to administer and provides all the benefits of BSD unix.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post Oct 6 2004, 09:47 AM
Post #12


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,119
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE
Red Hat or SUSE?

SUSE (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_pokal.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Hi_Fi_Guy
post Oct 6 2004, 10:02 AM
Post #13


Tuetonic terror
**

Group: Members
Posts: 375
Joined: 12-August 03
From: Sunny Phoenix, AZ
Member No.: 1,019



Another vote for Mac OS X. The best Linux box you can share with non Linux people too (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Steve Thacker
post Oct 6 2004, 10:18 AM
Post #14


UMMMPH Yea Baby Yea ! UMMMPH
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,089
Joined: 8-January 03
From: Pickerington, Ohio
Member No.: 113
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I'm a SuSE guy. Redhat just didn't cut it for me
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brando
post Oct 6 2004, 10:56 AM
Post #15


BUY MY SPARE KIDNEY!!!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,935
Joined: 29-August 04
From: Santa Ana, CA
Member No.: 2,648
Region Association: Southern California



Fedora Core 2 and Red Hat 9 tickle my fancy.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Oct 6 2004, 10:57 AM
Post #16


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,331
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Suse, but it has been a while.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
airsix
post Oct 6 2004, 11:26 AM
Post #17


I have bees in my epiglotis
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,196
Joined: 7-February 03
From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State)
Member No.: 266



Another vote for SuSE. I hate RH. My two favorites are Debian (and Debain derivatives) and SuSE. Don't think I'd deploy raw Debian on desktops (but use it exclusively on servers). For desktop deployment I wouldn't hesitate at all to use SuSE.

-Ben M.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kafermeister
post Oct 6 2004, 03:09 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 778
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Cincinnati/Northern KY
Member No.: 174



I've got two Fedora Core1 machines. One is dual boot Win98/Core1. Both were upgraded to Core1 from either RH9 or RH8. No problems. Everything works that worked before. Yum rocks.

.....although I'm a closet Suse fan. I like the interface but I don't have any seat time with it.

If you like the RH stuff, Fedora will be a nice fit.

Rick
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
froggie
post Oct 7 2004, 03:43 PM
Post #19


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 24-October 03
From: Van Nuys, CA
Member No.: 1,274



SuSE
I think they give a lot more for the money. Support is good. Updates easy. Windows runs well in VMware except for sound.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bryanthompson
post Oct 7 2004, 03:51 PM
Post #20


Check it out... 3 loops!
**

Group: Members
Posts: 208
Joined: 23-April 04
From: elwood, ne
Member No.: 1,970



I've been using Redhat 9 forever and just moved to Fedora 2.

To save yourself from package dependency HELL, download apt and synaptic right away. it's the best way to keep all of your packages up-to-date and friendly with each other.

Happy Linux'n (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rocking nana.gif)
If you haven't used linux before... just stick with it. If you dual boot and think you'll end up breaking away from windows eventually, you probably won't. The only way to do it, imho, is to just format your windows drive and never look back. Try to keep yourself from thinking, "damn this was a ton easier to do in windows." At first it's hard as heck to make the switch, but you'll be glad in the end. That... or just get an Apple and never worry again (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 02:03 AM