Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 1.7 Owners or Previous Owners ........ Opinions Needed
Kaduku
post Feb 10 2013, 01:23 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: 1-January 13
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 15,324
Region Association: None



I am new to 914s and have a chance to purchase my first 914, which is a 1.7. I know the 2.0s are faster and better, but is 1.7 good enough for me????

Please help me decide!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rmital
post Feb 10 2013, 01:30 PM
Post #2


Northeast optimist
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,954
Joined: 12-December 05
From: Park Ridge, NJ
Member No.: 5,268



I've had both 1.7 and 2.0
I guess you could say the 2.0 has a little more "pull" off the line (best I could describe), but please if you've found a nice solid 1.7 that's mechanically sound, get it....better than a rusty 2.0!

a friend has a '71 1.7, and when I drive it I get the same "yahhoooo" feeling when I hit the gas..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kaduku
post Feb 10 2013, 01:40 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: 1-January 13
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 15,324
Region Association: None



QUOTE(rmital @ Feb 10 2013, 11:30 AM) *


a friend has a '71 1.7, and when I drive it I get the same "yahhoooo" feeling when I hit the gas..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)


Okay the "Buy It" meter just moved up one notch. Thanks, and yes it looks structurally and mechanically sound. And it's pretty too
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kaduku
post Feb 10 2013, 01:46 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: 1-January 13
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 15,324
Region Association: None



Don't know if this matters, but it is a 1973 1.7
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tom_T
post Feb 10 2013, 02:11 PM
Post #5


TMI....
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,321
Joined: 19-March 09
From: Orange, CA
Member No.: 10,181
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Kaduku @ Feb 10 2013, 11:46 AM) *

Don't know if this matters, but it is a 1973 1.7


That one looks like a nice 914, but you'll need a knowledgeable 914 person/mechanic to do a PPI.

1.7L's had 80 HP 70-72 MY's - in 73 it dropped to 76 HP & a very "doggy" 69 HP for CA sold cars!

...vs 95 HP for the 73-74 2L - which you will notice the difference IMHO having driven 70-72 & 73 1.7s & my own 73 2L.

Then the 75-76 dropped the 2L to only 86 HP IIRC, so maybe Ray drove a later GC engined 2L, which wasn't much different than a 70-72 1.7 at 80 HP?

However, I agree that a nice rust free 1.7 is better than a rusty 2.0.

Try driving a few of both & see what YOU like or don't, then make your decision. Also the 73-74 2.0 will be a bit more pricey than a 1.7, so your budget may determine which works for you.

.... as you'll see comparing here:
http://www.nadaguides.com/Classic-Cars/197...arga-2-0/Values

http://www.hagerty.com/valuationtools/HVT/...eport?vc=879762
^ - back track to select different years & 1.7, 1.8, etc. on these two links

Also use this to evaluate all you look at seriously:
http://bowlsby.net/914/Classic/zTN_Gen_914CAF.pdf

Also read up here & these links to "edumacate" yourself on 914s -
http://bowlsby.net/914/Classic/
http://bowlsby.net/914/CanAm/
914club.com
p914.com

Good Luck! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
Tom
///////


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JawjaPorsche
post Feb 10 2013, 02:20 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,463
Joined: 23-July 11
From: Clayton, Georgia
Member No.: 13,351
Region Association: South East States



Porsche put the 1.7 in their 70 thru 73 914's. It is a well-tested engine. The 914 is fun car to drive regardless if it has a 1.7 or 2.0.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kaduku
post Feb 10 2013, 02:30 PM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: 1-January 13
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 15,324
Region Association: None



QUOTE


Try driving a few of both & see what YOU like or don't, then make your decision.


Lol, You know I will want a 2.0 if I drive one, which I haven't yet. This is the reason why I want to hear from owners from their experience. In fact, I have only drove one 914 for like 500 yards, don't remember which model, but it could have been a 75 or 76.

In other words, I am trying to find justifications to buy this particular car.

Thanks for info Tom!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Feb 10 2013, 02:34 PM
Post #8


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,970
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I like my little 1.7. Early cars are lighter. Always go for the least rusty car possible.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kaduku
post Feb 10 2013, 02:49 PM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: 1-January 13
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 15,324
Region Association: None



QUOTE(JawjaPorsche @ Feb 10 2013, 12:20 PM) *

Porsche put the 1.7 in their 70 thru 73 914's. It is a well-tested engine. The 914 is fun car to drive regardless if it has a 1.7 or 2.0.


Beautiful 914, looks like the one I am interested in.

Thanks everyone, this is really helping me decide.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JawjaPorsche
post Feb 10 2013, 03:26 PM
Post #10


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,463
Joined: 23-July 11
From: Clayton, Georgia
Member No.: 13,351
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Kaduku @ Feb 10 2013, 03:49 PM) *

QUOTE(JawjaPorsche @ Feb 10 2013, 12:20 PM) *

Porsche put the 1.7 in their 70 thru 73 914's. It is a well-tested engine. The 914 is fun car to drive regardless if it has a 1.7 or 2.0.


Beautiful 914, looks like the one I am interested in.

Thanks everyone, this is really helping me decide.


Thank you so much for your kind words about my 914. I am blessed.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
somd914
post Feb 10 2013, 04:41 PM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,171
Joined: 21-February 11
From: Southern Maryland
Member No.: 12,741
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(mepstein @ Feb 10 2013, 03:34 PM) *

I like my little 1.7. Early cars are lighter. Always go for the least rusty car possible.


And rusty cars are even lighter! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)

Seriously engine swaps/upgrades are easier and cheaper to deal with than rust.

My 73 started as a 1.7, PO swapped to a 2.0, I recently swapped in a 2056 with a mid_RPM cam and daul Webers (hope this doesn't spark the never ending FI/Carb religion battle). My 2056 has quite a bit more right foot response, but still not fast by any stretch of the imagination. I'm glad I swapped, but others are content with a 1.7 or 2.0, and then others go for sixes and V-8's. It all boils down to what you like, but avoid rust... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sawzall-smiley.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TheCabinetmaker
post Feb 10 2013, 04:56 PM
Post #12


I drive my car everyday
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,341
Joined: 8-May 03
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Member No.: 666



Like the others have said, HP is the easy part. Rust repair is much harder and could be more costly.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cary
post Feb 10 2013, 08:16 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,900
Joined: 26-January 04
From: Sherwood Oregon
Member No.: 1,608
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I'm putting a driven hard 1.7 in my restoration project when its finished. Going to paint the tin and clean up the fins and drive it till it gets too tired.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Feb 10 2013, 09:37 PM
Post #14


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



never buy a car without pulling the rockers
I would recommend always having a 914 knowledgeable person look it over too...

User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kaduku
post Feb 10 2013, 10:27 PM
Post #15


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: 1-January 13
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 15,324
Region Association: None



QUOTE(brant @ Feb 10 2013, 07:37 PM) *

never buy a car without pulling the rockers
I would recommend always having a 914 knowledgeable person look it over too...



I guess this has to be done!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rick 918-S
post Feb 10 2013, 10:31 PM
Post #16


Hey nice rack! -Celette
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 21,020
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Now in Superior WI
Member No.: 43
Region Association: Northstar Region



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Heeltoe914
post Feb 11 2013, 10:31 AM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,135
Joined: 31-January 06
From: Tujunga Calif,
Member No.: 5,506



QUOTE(rmital @ Feb 10 2013, 11:30 AM) *

I've had both 1.7 and 2.0
I guess you could say the 2.0 has a little more "pull" off the line (best I could describe), but please if you've found a nice solid 1.7 that's mechanically sound, get it....better than a rusty 2.0!

a friend has a '71 1.7, and when I drive it I get the same "yahhoooo" feeling when I hit the gas..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)




A well tuned four 1.7 is a blast. Do not let that size stop you from buying a car thats clean or fits your needs in every other way. GL
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Spoke
post Feb 11 2013, 12:31 PM
Post #18


Jerry
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,193
Joined: 29-October 04
From: Allentown, PA
Member No.: 3,031
Region Association: None



Go for the 2L. I've owned both and the 2L is a lot more fun than the 1.7L
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JawjaPorsche
post Feb 11 2013, 12:32 PM
Post #19


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,463
Joined: 23-July 11
From: Clayton, Georgia
Member No.: 13,351
Region Association: South East States



You said it was a 73? That is great because that the first year of Porsche changing to side shift tranny! Much better tranny!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tilly74
post Feb 11 2013, 12:44 PM
Post #20


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 96
Joined: 5-June 12
From: Springfield, MO
Member No.: 14,522
Region Association: None



My first ride in a 914 was one with a 2.0 bus motor rated at 68 HP or something like that. I thought it was awesome. LOL shows how many rides I've had in a 914. As long as you're not expecting it to accelerate like a modern large displacement sports car, you'll be fine.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th July 2025 - 04:36 PM