Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Exhaust Decision for 2056, Stock heat exchangers or SSI
914Sixer
post Feb 16 2016, 05:50 PM
Post #1


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,123
Joined: 17-January 05
From: San Angelo Texas
Member No.: 3,457
Region Association: Southwest Region



I am trying to clean out all the spares I have. I have a choice of a good set of each type of heat exchangers. I like the light weight of the SSI but to me they do not sound as good as the stock one.

Right now I am leaning to the stock with a Dansk banana muffler. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Any thoughts?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
screenguy914
post Feb 16 2016, 05:56 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 249
Joined: 6-July 09
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 10,540
Region Association: Southern California



911 engine? If option A are early factory heat exchangers, there's little loss in choosing over the SSI versions (Option B). If option A are the post-73 type (single crossover), you would be giving up some power.

Sherwood
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914Sixer
post Feb 16 2016, 06:04 PM
Post #3


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,123
Joined: 17-January 05
From: San Angelo Texas
Member No.: 3,457
Region Association: Southwest Region



Not a -6 engine. Bumped 75 2.0 L.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EdwardBlume
post Feb 16 2016, 07:04 PM
Post #4


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,338
Joined: 2-January 03
From: SLO
Member No.: 81
Region Association: Central California



Tangerine. I know it's not an option but that's my answer.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bob L.
post Feb 16 2016, 07:09 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 848
Joined: 7-August 11
From: Austin TX
Member No.: 13,411
Region Association: Southwest Region



From what I have read, the stock '75/6 2.0 exhaust is a bit of a dog.
The SSI's would be a better performance choice.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914Sixer
post Feb 16 2016, 07:38 PM
Post #6


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,123
Joined: 17-January 05
From: San Angelo Texas
Member No.: 3,457
Region Association: Southwest Region



OOPS I forgot to mention that I was using 73-74 2.0L stock heat exchangers NOT 75-76 ones.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tom_T
post Feb 16 2016, 08:18 PM
Post #7


TMI....
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,321
Joined: 19-March 09
From: Orange, CA
Member No.: 10,181
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(914Sixer @ Feb 16 2016, 05:38 PM) *

OOPS I forgot to mention that I was using 73-74 2.0L stock heat exchangers NOT 75-76 ones.


In that case Marc, the performance would be about the same, the sound is all in your ears & taste - so your choice (but hang onto the SSIs for back-up), but you'd have to watch for rust both inside & outside on the stock mild steel set so you don't CO (IMG:style_emoticons/default/icon8.gif) yourself.

IMHO the new Dansk banana sounds the same as the OE ones did (except for the better flowing old Leistritz Sport version Banana, like the one sitting in my garage for my resto ;-) - plus you get a chrome tip with the Dansk!
(on the tail-pipe - not you ;-)

Cheers! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
Tom
///////
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 01:56 PM