Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> CHT sensors GB PN 0280130012, $25 each need 10 takers
Mikey914
post Sep 23 2017, 10:10 AM
Post #1


The rubber man
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,679
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Hillsboro, OR
Member No.: 3,348
Region Association: None



I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.

The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul.

If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine.

-Mark
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
seanpaulmc
post Sep 23 2017, 10:37 AM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 305
Joined: 6-December 16
From: Orlando, FL
Member No.: 20,649
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Mikey914 @ Sep 23 2017, 12:10 PM) *

I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.

The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul.

If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine.

-Mark


Bump
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
markhoward
post Sep 23 2017, 11:00 AM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 379
Joined: 5-March 17
From: Lafayette, CA
Member No.: 20,897
Region Association: Northern California



count me in
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Sep 23 2017, 11:32 AM
Post #4


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,205
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



I'm in Mark....for the next motor.

Need two inner door seals as well for my passenger side.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/icon_bump.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
walterolin
post Sep 23 2017, 11:38 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 685
Joined: 30-November 11
From: Louisville, Ky
Member No.: 13,838
Region Association: South East States



More crack - I'm in for one.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914Next
post Sep 23 2017, 11:46 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 28-July 14
From: Ephraim Wisconsin
Member No.: 17,695
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Mikey914 @ Sep 23 2017, 12:10 PM) *

I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.

The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul.

If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine.

-Mark



Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Olympic 914
post Sep 23 2017, 06:25 PM
Post #7



***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,680
Joined: 7-July 11
From: Pittsburgh PA
Member No.: 13,287
Region Association: North East States



What is the cold Ohm resistance ?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mikey914
post Sep 23 2017, 07:15 PM
Post #8


The rubber man
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,679
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Hillsboro, OR
Member No.: 3,348
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Olympic 914 @ Sep 23 2017, 05:25 PM) *

What is the cold Ohm resistance ?

Depends on the temperature.
These are matched to the 2.0 curve.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
draganc
post Sep 23 2017, 08:26 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 725
Joined: 2-November 09
From: central new jersey
Member No.: 11,000
Region Association: North East States



Mark,

Count me in for one.

Thanks,
dc
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Porschef
post Sep 24 2017, 06:18 AM
Post #10


How you doin'
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,168
Joined: 7-September 10
From: LawnGuyland
Member No.: 12,152
Region Association: North East States



I'll give one a whirl
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Freezin 914
post Sep 24 2017, 06:26 AM
Post #11


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 880
Joined: 27-July 14
From: Wisconsin
Member No.: 17,687
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I will take one, (IMG:style_emoticons/default/icon_bump.gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Olympic 914
post Sep 24 2017, 06:45 AM
Post #12



***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,680
Joined: 7-July 11
From: Pittsburgh PA
Member No.: 13,287
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(Mikey914 @ Sep 23 2017, 09:15 PM) *

QUOTE(Olympic 914 @ Sep 23 2017, 05:25 PM) *

What is the cold Ohm resistance ?

Depends on the temperature.
These are matched to the 2.0 curve.


I'll give one a try also, send me the code...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
whitetwinturbo
post Sep 24 2017, 09:19 AM
Post #13


Honey, does this wing make my ass look fat?
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,391
Joined: 22-October 11
From: Newport Beach/Kalefornya/USA
Member No.: 13,704
Region Association: Southern California



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mikey914
post Sep 25 2017, 02:06 AM
Post #14


The rubber man
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,679
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Hillsboro, OR
Member No.: 3,348
Region Association: None



QUOTE(914Next @ Sep 23 2017, 10:46 AM) *

QUOTE(Mikey914 @ Sep 23 2017, 12:10 PM) *

I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.

The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul.

If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine.

-Mark



Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks.

The only difference is that some have a ballast in line with it. If you have one and all your components are in the factory configuration, otherwise do not add one.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mikey914
post Sep 25 2017, 02:09 AM
Post #15


The rubber man
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,679
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Hillsboro, OR
Member No.: 3,348
Region Association: None



I will be sending out codes here late today. I also have 3 other GBs running so you can combine.
They are -
- The CHT for D jet PN 0280130012
-shift bushings GB
-GB for Mirror - Late
-GB for the positive terminal block that will be launching tonight and I'm working on a complete cable option.


Thanks all!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
turk22
post Sep 25 2017, 08:04 PM
Post #16


Treetop Flyer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 735
Joined: 27-July 12
From: Cincinnati OH
Member No.: 14,725
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I will take one as well
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mikey914
post Sep 26 2017, 09:07 PM
Post #17


The rubber man
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,679
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Hillsboro, OR
Member No.: 3,348
Region Association: None



PMs sent to all so far
Closing this sunday.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JamesM
post Oct 2 2017, 02:04 AM
Post #18


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,922
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Kearns, UT
Member No.: 5,834
Region Association: Intermountain Region



QUOTE(Mikey914 @ Sep 25 2017, 12:06 AM) *

QUOTE(914Next @ Sep 23 2017, 10:46 AM) *

QUOTE(Mikey914 @ Sep 23 2017, 12:10 PM) *

I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.

The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul.

If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine.

-Mark



Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks.

The only difference is that some have a ballast in line with it. If you have one and all your components are in the factory configuration, otherwise do not add one.


Double check that. If my memory serves me the "proper" sensor for a 73 2.0 setup had a resistance curve that was quite a bit different off by something like >1k ohms when cold. 73 was an odd duck setup as it used a unique CHT and MPS to get the 2.0 to run correctly on the 72 1.7 ECU. 74 the 2.0 got a unique ECU and went back to using sensors with curves closer to the 1.7s.

Ill see if I can dig up the data, if not I have both a 73 and 74 setup I can compare.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JamesM
post Oct 2 2017, 02:31 AM
Post #19


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,922
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Kearns, UT
Member No.: 5,834
Region Association: Intermountain Region



Looks like Brand Anders has some of the data on his site.
https://members.rennlist.com/pbanders/DJetParts.htm

At operating temp they are similar but the warm-up curve is significantly different. Long time ago I had a 73 with a miss matched CHT sensor, ran like absolute garbage until it came up to temp. It will run, warmup is trash though. That was actually the motor i did my first Megasquirt build on because even 15 years ago it was near impossible to find the 017 sensor a 73 2.0 needs.

If you want to save guys running 73 2.0s a lot of headaches make a run of these with a thermistor that has the same curve as the 0 280 130 017 sensor.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 04:35 AM