Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> whats the best mpg, that you have done in your teener
messix
post Sep 12 2005, 10:46 PM
Post #1


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



on the a road run with the guys last month on back roads not even taken it easy i got 29.5mpg.
i'm trying something this tank while drivin to an fro to work, 8 miles of surface streets and a little freeway. short shift [edit; i ment skip shift] using 1st , 3rd, and 5th.
all on flat easy roads. use brakes only not down shifting while decel. or stopping.
its hard to not just row through the gears, but i'll try my best.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Pugbug
post Sep 12 2005, 10:59 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 449
Joined: 14-February 05
From: Victoria, BC
Member No.: 3,604



Downshifting while decelerating does not use gas, but not downshifting wears brakes faster.
I haven't checked my mileage....but not using nearly as much as my pickup, so i don't care... Gassed up today... $1.29 for a litre of 92 grade! 4.55 litres per imperial gallon. Yikes!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Sep 12 2005, 11:12 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



0 miles



1 gallon of gas


2 jackstands



(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/unsure.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
smg914
post Sep 12 2005, 11:13 PM
Post #4


Sahara Beige Steve
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 22-February 04
From: Tampa, FL
Member No.: 1,695
Region Association: None



Back in the 70's on a trip from New Jersey to Lynchburg Virginia I went 550 miles on one tank full in my 1973 914 2.0.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Sep 12 2005, 11:20 PM
Post #5


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



QUOTE (Pugbug @ Sep 12 2005, 08:59 PM)
Downshifting while decelerating does not use gas, but not downshifting wears brakes faster.
I haven't checked my mileage....but not using nearly as much as my pickup, so i don't care... Gassed up today... $1.29 for a litre of 92 grade! 4.55 litres per imperial gallon. Yikes!

So, would you rather use brake pads to slow the car, or use the clutch to slow the car? SOMETHING has to slip, and brake pads are a lot easier and cheaper to replace than clutches...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pete-stevers
post Sep 12 2005, 11:23 PM
Post #6


saved from fire!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,642
Joined: 10-October 04
From: Abbotsford,BC, Canada
Member No.: 2,914
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Well....the worst gas milage I got was when a gas line poped of, the motor shut off, I tried to start the car a couple of times....yup the ground was covered in gas, a nice big puddle.....but yippie (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/mueba.gif) ...no fire,
sorry for the (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/hijacked.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JoeSharp
post Sep 12 2005, 11:27 PM
Post #7


In Irvine, Ca. May 15-18
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,947
Joined: 9-July 03
From: DeLand, Florida
Member No.: 898
Region Association: South East States



Soo,,, What is this, most of us don't have wdorking odometers and the rest are too embarassed to say?????
:PERMAGRIN: Joe
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post Sep 12 2005, 11:38 PM
Post #8


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



if i understand l-jet f/i correctly the air valve senses fuel demand by how much air goes thru it. there for even when the throttle is closed there is still air going by the the throttle plate for idle. now under the high "vaccum" of decel. the engine is pulling more air passed the throttle plate even though its closed and this greater volume of air being sensed by the air valve and is firing longer fuel pulses to the injectors.

do i have this right or wrong
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Sep 12 2005, 11:40 PM
Post #9


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



I dunno... I cheat.

I had this Saab, with all that information up to the second.. I loved doing the back side of hills in that thing... "Ahhh 143 miles per gallon.. I rock"...



M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Sep 12 2005, 11:43 PM
Post #10


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



QUOTE (messix @ Sep 13 2005, 01:38 AM)

do i have this right or wrong

If the TPS is at idle, that's how much gas is flowing... I am pretty sure.

M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TravisNeff
post Sep 13 2005, 12:00 AM
Post #11


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 20-March 03
From: Mesa, AZ
Member No.: 447
Region Association: Southwest Region



With my recently transplanted injected 2056 I think I got in the neighborhood of 23mpg, mixed driving. Engine had sat for a year, then before that it sat longer - so I think I have some crap in the injectors, all other components check out fine (mps was tested and charted by Brad Anders).

With the injected 1.7 I got 34mpg going out to WCC.

Gotta figure out why the mileage isn't that great in the 2.0
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Type 4 Unleashed
post Sep 13 2005, 01:22 AM
Post #12


CREATIVE TYPE lV ENGINEERING
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 787
Joined: 20-June 04
From: Aliso Viejo, ca
Member No.: 2,231
Region Association: None



After, all these years, collecting speedo's, I finally got one with a working odometer, and I just checked it the other day, 21.4, and thats with a 2.6 4 cyl with 48 Dell's and I would get more if I could keep my foot out of it (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/happy11.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gustl
post Sep 13 2005, 01:23 AM
Post #13


914 enthusiast & historian
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,522
Joined: 16-June 04
From: TIROL / Austria
Member No.: 2,212
Region Association: Austria



if someone could tell me the conversion from liter to gallon I could calculate ...

normally my 1.8 L-Jet is about 8.5 - 9.0 liter on 100 km*
but I didn't try to save on fuel yet - the teener is my hobby, not my daily driver (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/dry.gif)

* 100 km = 62.5 miles (AFAIK)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SpecialK
post Sep 13 2005, 02:39 AM
Post #14


aircraft surgeon
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Pacific, MO
Member No.: 1,797



My '74 2.0L got 50.7 mpg on a 180 mile leg of a trip from Chicago to St. Louis...all highway. After I fixed all of the vacuum leaks (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/slap.gif) it got significantly worse (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/dry.gif) (time to start pokin' some holes in stuff!)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Hammy
post Sep 13 2005, 02:44 AM
Post #15


mr. Wonderful
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,826
Joined: 20-October 04
From: Columbia, California
Member No.: 2,978
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE (lapuwali @ Sep 12 2005, 10:20 PM)
QUOTE (Pugbug @ Sep 12 2005, 08:59 PM)
Downshifting while decelerating does not use gas, but not downshifting wears brakes faster.
  I haven't checked my mileage....but not using nearly as much as my pickup, so i don't care... Gassed up today... $1.29 for a litre of 92 grade!  4.55 litres per imperial gallon.   Yikes!

So, would you rather use brake pads to slow the car, or use the clutch to slow the car? SOMETHING has to slip, and brake pads are a lot easier and cheaper to replace than clutches...

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/dry.gif)
So do I downshift or not? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wacko.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cbenitah
post Sep 13 2005, 03:13 AM
Post #16


Protected by the Swedish Maffia
***

Group: Members
Posts: 848
Joined: 16-August 05
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 4,597



QUOTE (Gustl @ Sep 12 2005, 11:23 PM)
if someone could tell me the conversion from liter to gallon I could calculate ...

normally my 1.8 L-Jet is about 8.5 - 9.0 liter on 100 km*
but I didn't try to save on fuel yet - the teener is my hobby, not my daily driver (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/dry.gif)

* 100 km = 62.5 miles (AFAIK)

1 L = 10 DL = 100 CL = 1000 ML

1 Gallon = 3.7854118 L

Little help from Sweden (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/drunk.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
iamchappy
post Sep 13 2005, 06:22 AM
Post #17


It all happens so fast!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,893
Joined: 5-November 03
From: minnetonka, mn
Member No.: 1,315
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I was able to get 72 while averaging 90 to 105 mph on a cross country trip.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BarberDave
post Sep 13 2005, 06:26 AM
Post #18


Barberdave
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,605
Joined: 12-January 03
From: Wauseon Ohio
Member No.: 135
Region Association: Upper MidWest



(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smilie_pokal.gif)
From Maumee to Effingham Ill. for the Fun Fest 37 MPG
Return 39 MPG about 400 miles each leg all but 50 miles Xway.
Iam leaving Fri For Kerrys event in Eastern Pa. Map Quest says 502 miles all turnpike will post results Mon.
1.7with small Webers 34's Dave (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/slap.gif)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post Sep 13 2005, 06:43 AM
Post #19


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,083
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Bay area to Denver, all highway, averaged 44 mpg in a 72 1.7.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gustl
post Sep 13 2005, 08:00 AM
Post #20


914 enthusiast & historian
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,522
Joined: 16-June 04
From: TIROL / Austria
Member No.: 2,212
Region Association: Austria



QUOTE (cbenitah @ Sep 13 2005, 11:13 AM)
QUOTE (Gustl @ Sep 12 2005, 11:23 PM)
if someone could tell me the conversion from liter to gallon I could calculate ...

normally my 1.8 L-Jet is about 8.5 - 9.0 liter on 100 km*
but I didn't try to save on fuel yet - the teener is my hobby, not my daily driver  <_<

* 100 km = 62.5 miles (AFAIK)

1 L = 10 DL = 100 CL = 1000 ML

1 Gallon = 3.7854118 L

Little help from Sweden (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/drunk.gif)

now that was really helpful (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/beerchug.gif)

if my calculation was correct, my teener goes about 27.8 mpg - through Tyrolean mountains and so (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/rolleyes.gif)

I'd say not that bad ...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th June 2024 - 06:08 AM