Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> scca IT cage rules question, Will it pass tech?
94teener2
post Nov 20 2005, 03:25 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: 2-October 05
From: livermore,ca
Member No.: 4,903




Putting in a cage for SCCA IT racing. Got main hoop to top of rockers (longs?). Am in process of putting in forward bar from main hoop to A pillar to either floor or top of rocker. Much prefer top of rock but the rules state to "floor"(gcr 18.3.c).

Anyone have any experience passing tech (getting logbook) with down tubes mounted to top of the rockers.

thanks
andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
groot
post Nov 20 2005, 03:42 PM
Post #2


Dis member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 17-December 03
From: Michigan
Member No.: 1,444



It's not required, but preferred (maybe recommended) to go to the floor. The tech inspector shouldn't give a sh@$.

My prod car's main hoop doesn't go to the floor and no tech inspector has said anything.

Check out a Miata sometime... with any reasonably sized driver, it's impossible to the main hoop on the floor unless you lean it back... no good.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Nov 20 2005, 03:59 PM
Post #3


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



It certainly shouldn't be preferred on a 914. The floor isn't a significant part of the structure. Mounting the base of the main hoops to the long is the right thing to do. Any tech inspector that so literally interprets the rules to insist it must be on the floor in such a car is not fit to be a tech inspector.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HotRod
post Nov 21 2005, 01:23 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 56
Joined: 13-January 03
From: Burke, Virginia
Member No.: 142



Do not go to the floor! Go to the top of the rocker. I believe that you have to have a reinforcment of a certian thickness and size (8 inches I think) if you go to the floor. The rocker provides a much more solid place to support both the rear main hoop and the front down tubes (the ones that go along the A pillar). In IT, if I remeber correctly, you can only have 6 mounting points.

Why IT? I would (and did) go production, I started in E Prod then moved to F when the changed the classification for the 1.8.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jhadler
post Nov 21 2005, 05:01 PM
Post #5


Long term tinkerer...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,879
Joined: 7-April 03
From: Lyons, CO
Member No.: 529



QUOTE (HotRod @ Nov 21 2005, 11:23 AM)
Do not go to the floor! Go to the top of the rocker. I believe that you have to have a reinforcment of a certian thickness and size (8 inches I think) if you go to the floor. The rocker provides a much more solid place to support both the rear main hoop and the front down tubes (the ones that go along the A pillar). In IT, if I remeber correctly, you can only have 6 mounting points.

Why IT? I would (and did) go production, I started in E Prod then moved to F when the changed the classification for the 1.8.

I wouldn't know Andy's actuall motivation, but IT is a whole lot less expensive than Production...

Just a hunch... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wink.gif)

-Josh2
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Nov 21 2005, 05:38 PM
Post #6


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,688
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



top of the long in the front!

(IMG:http://www.sirandy.com/pix/914/09.01.2002/andy8.jpg)

(IMG:http://www.sirandy.com/pix/914/09.01.2002/andy10.jpg)

(IMG:http://www.sirandy.com/pix/914/09.01.2002/andy7.jpg)

(IMG:http://www.sirandy.com/pix/914/09.01.2002/andy9.jpg)

(IMG:http://www.sirandy.com/pix/914/09.01.2002/andy6.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
94teener2
post Nov 21 2005, 09:51 PM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: 2-October 05
From: livermore,ca
Member No.: 4,903



Thanks Guys!!! Top of the longs it is.

Why IT? Much less expensive. Someday maybe I'll move up. Going with a 1.7 which is now in ITC. Should be reasonably competitive with 510s. I beat up on them with an ITA 2 liter a few years back. (not saying much, a ITA car beating up on a ITC car, but I'll take it)


Lots to do before drivers school!

thanks again

andy


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TC/914
post Nov 22 2005, 10:48 AM
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 203
Joined: 21-October 04
From: Southern MA
Member No.: 2,981



Oh, and make sure that the mounting plates have the required number of square inches. We had to re-do the rears, behind the seats, in the TR8 because they were too small.

Luck,

TC

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 02:27 AM