Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Question for track only 4 corner coil over 914s...., what spring rates are you running?
nine14cats
post Apr 26 2006, 06:35 PM
Post #1


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



The Beast is built for coil overs on all 4 corners. What spring rates are you guys with 4 wheel coil overs using?

I know TimT has coilovers if memory serves....

And if you have Fr / Rr weight distribution that would be great.....

My previous track 914-6 had T-bars front / springs rear.

Thanks,

Bill P.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nine14cats
post Apr 26 2006, 10:09 PM
Post #2


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/icon_bump.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
9146R
post Apr 26 2006, 10:16 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 223
Joined: 28-September 04
From: alamo ca
Member No.: 2,849



Bill,

I have koni yellow shox in back on adjustable perches. 2.4 litre motor - car weighs 2069 without me. Running 250 lb rear springs. Let me know if you want anything else.
Greg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nine14cats
post Apr 26 2006, 11:11 PM
Post #4


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



Hi Greg,

Are you running coil overs in the front? On our first track only 914-6 we ran 23mm T bars up front and 400 lbs springs in the back.

For The Beast, I'm looking for what spring ratio front to back guys are running. For example: Fronts 550lbs, rears 450lbs...etc....

Thanks,

Bill P.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Apr 26 2006, 11:20 PM
Post #5


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



I vaugely remember a cali guy with a 2.0 in his car that ran 300 front and 250 backs....

havent seen him in a year and a half...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
9146R
post Apr 26 2006, 11:40 PM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 223
Joined: 28-September 04
From: alamo ca
Member No.: 2,849



Bill,

Front shox are (older) green Bilsteins. Were in car when I bot it 5-6 years ago...not adjustable but still feel pretty solid. I have 22mm front torsion bars. Just had it aligned at Roger Krause shop, corner wtd lf=512lb, rf=454lb, lr=687lb,rr=608lb. With me in car total weight 2261. Front wt 966, Rear wt 1295. Car handles nicely with the 225x45x15 R3s0s Hoosiers.
Look fwd to seeing you up there this weekend...we are leaving Alamo ~5am Sat.
Greg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
db9146
post Apr 27 2006, 08:14 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 953
Joined: 21-December 04
From: Atlanta, GA
Member No.: 3,315
Region Association: None



Bill,

Have you reinforced the front strut towers to take the load that was being carried by the torsion bars?

I am going to run coil-overs all around but I will not have a cage with the usual suspension pick-up point re-inforcements...this will be just a hot street car. I'm very interested in any responses as well.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jeroen
post Apr 27 2006, 09:02 AM
Post #8


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,887
Joined: 24-December 02
From: The Netherlands
Member No.: 3
Region Association: Europe



Cary Eisenlohr (from ERP) posted on the PP board a while ago that even a 911 (which has weeker front shock towers than a 914) doesn't need reinforcements to run coilovers
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nine14cats
post Apr 27 2006, 09:17 AM
Post #9


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



My car has been reinforced in the front with camber boxes and tubing.

Here is a pic of it.

Bill P.



Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
slivel
post Apr 27 2006, 09:30 AM
Post #10


Old car....... older driver
***

Group: Members
Posts: 510
Joined: 10-July 04
From: San Diego
Member No.: 2,332
Region Association: Southern California



I have run as high as 450 front and 350 rear but have been going softer over the last two seasons. This year I am trying stacked springs - a main and a tender. This gives a progressive rate and feels good on the tracks that I run. For linear rate springs I liked 350 front and 250 rear a lot for my setup. Car weighs 2050 minus driver. I have both front and rear sway bars but selectively hook up the rear bar at certain tracks.

Steve
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TimT
post Apr 27 2006, 10:13 AM
Post #11


retired
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,033
Joined: 18-February 03
From: Wantagh, NY
Member No.: 313



Im running 450# front, and 350# rears. I found this combo works well on all except really rough tracks.

When I bought my car it had 600# all around (IMG:style_emoticons/default/screwy.gif) that was a bit much
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nine14cats
post Apr 27 2006, 10:17 AM
Post #12


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



Thanks for the info Tim. What I find interesting is how much different the coil overs spring rates are in comparison to T-bars and spring combo's.

On my previous 914-6 the equivalent front to back rates had the softer setup up front, similar to a 911. But I've heard from a couple of people including yourself that they have a heavier rate in the front. I wonder what the physics are behind that? The way T-bars transmit resistance versus a coil spring?

Thanks again!

Bill P.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
slivel
post Apr 27 2006, 02:25 PM
Post #13


Old car....... older driver
***

Group: Members
Posts: 510
Joined: 10-July 04
From: San Diego
Member No.: 2,332
Region Association: Southern California



Part of the answer is found in the motion ratio and wheel rate. The front on a coil over car is .83 and the rear is 1.86. So multiply those numbers times your spring rate to get an approximation of what rate the wheel is experiencing.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
byndbad914
post Apr 27 2006, 02:50 PM
Post #14


shoehorn and some butter - it fits
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,547
Joined: 23-January 06
From: Broomfield, CO
Member No.: 5,463
Region Association: None



QUOTE(nine14cats @ Apr 27 2006, 09:17 AM) *

But I've heard from a couple of people including yourself that they have a heavier rate in the front. I wonder what the physics are behind that?
Bill P.


Bill, with my V8 car I had 300 fronts and 450 rears as a "starting point". I can tell you this much - I needed heavier rate fronts for sure. My car was 2305lbs without me in it and 59.5% rear weight distribution. With equal sized 9" wide tires all the way around it oversteered like no other car I have driven!! I maxed the Tarret sway bar in the front to stiffen it up and still had oversteer, but could throttle in understeer slightly.

Ergo the desire for a higher front spring rate for me with that combo. Slivel is correct about different length "advantages" f to r, but rates are dependant on a lot of factors. If you are running the same size tire front and rear, and have a 60% rear weight with an aluminum head 350 Chevy, I would guess a 400-500lb/in front rate with a 450 rear rate would be good to start with. Now I will have 1.5" wider rear tires than fronts, so I may not have to change the front spring rate much to tune out oversteer.

Spring rates will have to be tuned to your combo and what feels good to you, no other way around it and there is so much flex in a tub car anyway.... Some like a car with a little oversteer, others a little understeer. That can be tuned in with spring rates and and adjustable bar(s).

edit - I just realized your "beast" is a six... so somewhat irrelevant on the rears - maybe around 350-400 rears with 350-450 fronts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KenH
post Apr 27 2006, 07:26 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 680
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Gilroy, CA
Member No.: 156



Bill,

Stop by the RV Saturday or Sunday and we can discuss some Spring Rate ideas.

Ken
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nine14cats
post Apr 27 2006, 09:13 PM
Post #16


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



Hi Ken,

I will see you this weekend.

Thanks!

Bill P.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 01:20 AM