Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Cylinder head flow data
lmcchesney
post Jan 28 2004, 06:26 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 24-November 03
From: Ocala, Fl.
Member No.: 1,381
Region Association: None



Does anyone have ranges for Type IV cylinder head flows with customary pocket porting and port matching? I believe is about 200-225CFM at each port. Also, any data on the effect of large valves on the flow rates? Any data on port velocities?
Yes, I know that miminal changes can produce significant changes in flow. However, in reality, there is not a lot of variations in the P/P of these heads.

Thanks,
L. McChesney
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DNHunt
post Jan 28 2004, 08:05 AM
Post #2


914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,099
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Member No.: 598



Check over on Shop Talk Forums. I remember seeing some of that stuff. A buddy of Jake with the handle Ham is a head guy and seems real sharp. Somebody over there will have it.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Jan 28 2004, 10:40 AM
Post #3


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 42,234
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(lmcchesney @ Jan 28 2004, 04:26 AM)
Also, any data on the effect of large valves on the flow rates?

i have some of that at home, can post it later tonight ...

Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lmcchesney
post Jan 28 2004, 01:39 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 24-November 03
From: Ocala, Fl.
Member No.: 1,381
Region Association: None



Thanks Dave.
Did a search on Shoptalkforums for author Ham. No results. However, there is some data by others. Seems to suggest 200-230CFM per intake port.

Thanks Andy. I await your posting.
Here's a sampling of our P/P job thus far:


L. McChesney


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) Still can't seem to post pictures.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Jan 28 2004, 02:18 PM
Post #5


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Don't worry about the intake..... the exhaust is the BIG issue.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lmcchesney
post Jan 28 2004, 03:51 PM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 24-November 03
From: Ocala, Fl.
Member No.: 1,381
Region Association: None



Can you expand on that Jake?
Increased porting of the Exhaust ports?
Use of CF's headers?
Increase exhaust duration?
All of the above?

L. McChesney
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jan 28 2004, 03:54 PM
Post #7


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,705
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



Cant seem to upload spreadsheets....... <_< <_<

Error message telling me no bad boy go away...

So try to decipher this

Intake/Exhaust Diameter 1.88 1.5 47mm+- 37mm+-
Valve lift/diameter L/D 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
Intake Valve Lift 0.094 0.188 0.282 0.376 0.47 0.564
Exhaust Valve Lift 0.075 0.15 0.225 0.3 0.375 0.45

Test Orifice Flow at 10" pressure 156.3 CFM
Test Flow correction factor 0.98

Flow Range (cfm) 10 18 29 40 59 84 105 140 185
Corrected Range 9.8 17.64 28.4 39.2 57.8 82.3 102.9 137.2 181.3

Test Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Port I or E Intake Intake Intake Intake Intake Intake Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust
Test Pressure 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Valve Lift (in) 0.094 0.188 0.282 0.376 0.47 0.564 0.075 0.15 0.225 0.3 0.375 0.45
Corrected Flow range 39.2 57.8 102.9 102.9 102.9 102.9 28.4 39.2 57.8 57.8 82.3 82.3
Flow meter 0.78 0.95 0.735 0.83 0.875 0.885 0.62 0.805 0.685 0.825 0.665 0.715
Chart CFM (Line 17*Line16) 30.58 54.91 75.63 85.4 90 91.1 17.6 31.6 39.6 47.7 54.7 58.9
Temp Difference 25 25 25 30 35 35 15 30 30 30 30 35
Temp Diff Factor 0.981 0.981 0.981 0.977 0.973 0.973 1.012 102.3 1.023 1.023 1.023 1.027
Corr test CFM 29.9 53.9 74.2 83.4 87.6 88.6 17.8 32.3 40.5 48.8 55.9 60.5
Corr CFM 11.1 19.9 27.5 30.9 32.5 32.8 10.5 19.1 23.9 28.9 33.1 35.8
Potential CFM 13.6 27.3 41 47 50.2 52.3 13.6 27.3 41 54.9 58.5 60.1
% Flow rating 82 73 67 65 65 62 77 70 58 53 57 60


R
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jan 28 2004, 03:56 PM
Post #8


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,705
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



Looks like if you copy all of it and put it in a spread sheet it will make sense...

Sorry, not my board...
XLS files are not permitted...

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/headbang.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Jan 28 2004, 04:16 PM
Post #9


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,036
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Do it as a screen shot then we can look at it.

Geoff
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jan 28 2004, 04:32 PM
Post #10


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,705
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



try this


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lmcchesney
post Jan 28 2004, 07:02 PM
Post #11


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 24-November 03
From: Ocala, Fl.
Member No.: 1,381
Region Association: None



Thanks R_Towle

Am I reading this right. 74mm intake at .564 lift has a corrected flow of 88.6CFM?

Can you provide the amount of head preperation done?
Valves 47 x 37mm
Was the exhaust boss removed?
Is the head port matched to 2.0L or 35mm intake 30mm exhaust?
How much bowl porting done?
Was the intakes cleaned to 60 grit?


Thanks for the informaiton.
L. McChesney
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Jan 29 2004, 10:37 AM
Post #12


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Stock intake ports flow over 200 CFM... Getting over 150 out the exhaust is a chore..
Thats why we use split duration- and alot of it!

The more work you do to the intake- the worse the ratio of intake/ exhaust is.... Most of my heads get no port work on the intake.

Flowbenches are great but they are dealing with air that has not gobne through a burning process already.. They give base line numbers- but don't live by one.

I have not flowed a set of heads in over a year on my bench.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lmcchesney
post Jan 29 2004, 12:36 PM
Post #13


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 24-November 03
From: Ocala, Fl.
Member No.: 1,381
Region Association: None



Thanks Jake,
That is what we are thinking. The Intake ports have had the protruding seams smoothed and ports matched only and polished to 60grit smoothness. The exhaust ports have had the work with removal of the boss and opening of the port sides while keeping the short radius smoothed but not changed. The port has also been patched.
Denny McNutt, Autocraft Engines, also believes stock heads flow at 200-225CFM and that is the data we have been using in the simulators. The crux seems to find a cam grind with about Intake dur of 260-265 but have an exhaust dur of 270-275.
By the way, Sean Rupp says hello and is still working on his Type IV.

Thanks again,
L. McChesney(Andrew, Eric and David)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brett W
post Jan 29 2004, 06:16 PM
Post #14


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,859
Joined: 17-September 03
From: huntsville, al
Member No.: 1,169
Region Association: None



The last set of heads I did were some 2.0 heads with stock valve sizes 42int 37 exh. I managed to get something like 190 on the intake side and something like 145 on the exhaust side. I wasn't happy with them but they will work well for the application. I figure I could have broken 200 on the intakes with 7mm valves and 150 on the exhaust, but the exhaust will definitley take a bunch of research to help them. I am trying to build a flow bench so I can do that shortly.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lmcchesney
post Jan 30 2004, 04:51 AM
Post #15


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 24-November 03
From: Ocala, Fl.
Member No.: 1,381
Region Association: None



Thanks everyone,
I pulled out the data from the Grassroots Motorsports article 8(6): 114 Dec 2001 on the head preperation they done and what the flow results were. Very similar.
Intake flow at .5 went from 175 to 188(+7%) and exhaust at .5 from 129 to 157(+22%) with a final E:I of 84%.
On the desktop dyno with a cam of IVD 262° IVO 12°BTDC IVC 70°ABDC and EVD 275° EVO 70.5°BBDC EVC 24.5 with a seperation of 116° and a timing of -5°.
Any thoughts?
Brent, I found an article on making your own flow bench, using six vacum cleaner motors and pitots for flow measurments. Cost estimates $800 with $600 in vacum cleaner motors. It is, "Flow Bench"
by Michael Doty but I don't remember where it is from. With the images, it is too big for attachment. If you email me, I can attach it to the email.
Thanks,
L. McChesney
lamcchesney@netzero.net
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Jan 30 2004, 09:07 AM
Post #16


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Those intakes are flowing WAY too much! Sounds like a "Typical" head job.....

Don't mean to be negative, but that throws the entire combination so far off that you can never get the engine to respond to tuning measures!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cnavarro
post Jan 30 2004, 10:58 AM
Post #17


Cylinder Guru
**

Group: Members
Posts: 472
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Chicagoland!
Member No.: 49
Region Association: None



There is a past thread where I uploaded a flow chart for my 42 x 38 specials :-) I have back in the office flow numbers for a dozen different head configurations that I can post if you guys want them. Here's the link to the thread:

http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?act...st=0&hl=nickies

Charles Navarro
LN Engineering
http://www.LNengineering.com
Aircooled Precision Performance
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brett W
post Jan 30 2004, 12:00 PM
Post #18


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,859
Joined: 17-September 03
From: huntsville, al
Member No.: 1,169
Region Association: None



I have seen the article on the flow bench. Not impressed. If you want to flow weedeater heads that might do the job. If you want to do some serious flow research you need to be testing at a minimum of 28 inches of water. I have a three hp motor with a large cetrifugal blower attached that I am going to use for my basis. I suspect the motor will be a little small. I would like to see a 10 hp motor but I didn't have one laying around.

Check out the bench Smokey used to use. Powered by a 100hp electric motor.

http://www.smokeyyunick.com/

look at the ebay items section.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Jan 30 2004, 01:39 PM
Post #19


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Is that an implication that I have inferior equipment??

I don't need to "Impress" anyone! Our works speaks for its self- argue with that

Fact is all I use that bench for is to measure the splits between ports, I don't even worry about whole numbers.

I already have 95% of all my head combinations matched to my engine combinations. As far as I'm concerned trying to flow heads for days is a waste of time anyway! it just gives you and IDEA on what to do...(how the hell do you think I designed 32 different split duration cams?)

The only way to prove it- is to build it. Unless someone builds as many engines as we do and make small changes and compare the results you will never know what you head numbers did - if you wasted all that time or not.

In my experience, the flow bench is basically a huge waste of time, just something to advertise with. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/bs.gif)

If I need a bench, my buddy is the shope Foreman over at Ernie Elliot Inc... They have 3 different benchs and the smallest one has 9 motors, biggest one has 27. It flows enough to test heads that have SEVEN POUNDS of aluminum removed from their ports.... Guess what else they have- a superflow 120 just like mine, and its not collecting dust either!

Hell I wouldn't even have one if I had not TRADED for it! It sat here for a year before I ever plugged it in.

Word of advise- Don't ever doubt me or my work, and we'll get along just fine. If you do doubt me you might just find yourself with an ultimate challenge of proving me wrong- better bring your supper with ya when you take that one on, and be ready for 3 days without sleep just to keep up with me!!

We all have our own ideas, I respect yours, just don't imply that I'm working with junk- That REALLY pisses me off.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Jan 30 2004, 01:51 PM
Post #20


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 42,234
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Jan 30 2004, 11:39 AM)
Word of advise- Don't ever doubt me or my work

thanks for the laugh (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

now go back and build engines, LOL

Andy

PS: finally, a pissing match where i'm only a spectator ...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd July 2025 - 10:56 PM