Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Original 6 - Rebuild or upgrade
kenschipper
post Aug 8 2009, 01:02 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 186
Joined: 5-May 04
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 2,025
Region Association: Northern California



May need to rebuild the original 2.0 6 in my 914-6. Trying to decide whether I should do the rebuild or replace the motor with a 3.0 or 3.2.

I love the sound of the original 6 but would appreciate a little more low end torque. I'm not sure that rebuilding the original 6 would be any cheaper that the 3.0/2.3 swap. There is a 3.0 with fresh rebuild on ebay right now that will go for less than $9,000. Those with experience may want to chime in.

Another question is whether to go with fuel injection or back to Weber's or PMO's. I know of all of the advantages of injection (more reliable, less power loss in the mountains, probably better milage) but the sound of carbs is hard to beat.

Do the 3.0/2.3 engines require an external oil cooler, don't remember at the moment.

Does anyone remember a link here on the site dealing with a 3.0/3.2 transplant.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914Sixer
post Aug 8 2009, 02:27 PM
Post #2


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,183
Joined: 17-January 05
From: San Angelo Texas
Member No.: 3,457
Region Association: Southwest Region



Keep the original motor for resale with car. Then stuff whatever you want in it. If you go carbs go with the PMO.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PanelBilly
post Aug 8 2009, 02:33 PM
Post #3


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,904
Joined: 23-July 06
From: Kent, Wa
Member No.: 6,488
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I'm going to run a 3.0 with the small engine mounted cooler, but I don't intend on driving the car that hard. If the 2.0 is original to the body, I say put it away and run the 3.0 Save the 2.0 and get it rebuilt when you have extra $ or save it for the future owner to put back in.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brp986s
post Aug 8 2009, 03:06 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 434
Joined: 27-September 07
From: los angeles
Member No.: 8,167



It's hard to answer this in a sentence or 2. I my case (original 6) I opted for 3.2, not so much for power, but b/c the motronic is the first really good fuel system. I was fed up with webers. That said, I did what porsche did as far as external cooler and wevo box. But be forewarned - slippery slope situation. Both timewise and $-wise. Good luck!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jt914-6
post Aug 8 2009, 03:52 PM
Post #5


Driving & working on teeners 41 years
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,787
Joined: 3-May 08
From: Bryant, Arkansas
Member No.: 9,003
Region Association: South East States



I've got a 3.0 in my '74 conversion. I once had it in an orignal six, but sold the body (getting weak). If you got a 3.0/3.2 I would add an oil cooler either up front or under rear trunk with a thermostat. Others who have them in the rear can tell you how they work. Mine is up front. Out today for a drive in mid 90's weather and oil never got above 190-200.
I'm using a kit from PMS for the 3.0 clutch. Went with the "puck" disc. Gives me no problem street driving. The kit lets you use the stock 901 box with the 3.0 flywheel/ring gear.
I've got Webers. What I had already. A friend has a 3.6 with FI and it's sure nice to start it up and GO.
You might consider upgrading brakes too with the larger engine?
That's the only issues I can think of, oil cooling and engine to tranny. If I've missed anything others will chime in.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kenschipper
post Aug 8 2009, 08:37 PM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 186
Joined: 5-May 04
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 2,025
Region Association: Northern California



What size webers did you go with?



QUOTE(jt914-6 @ Aug 8 2009, 02:52 PM) *

I've got a 3.0 in my '74 conversion. I once had it in an orignal six, but sold the body (getting weak). If you got a 3.0/3.2 I would add an oil cooler either up front or under rear trunk with a thermostat. Others who have them in the rear can tell you how they work. Mine is up front. Out today for a drive in mid 90's weather and oil never got above 190-200.
I'm using a kit from PMS for the 3.0 clutch. Went with the "puck" disc. Gives me no problem street driving. The kit lets you use the stock 901 box with the 3.0 flywheel/ring gear.
I've got Webers. What I had already. A friend has a 3.6 and it's sure nice to start it up and GO.
You might consider upgrading brakes too with the larger engine?
That's the only issues I can think of, oil cooling and engine to tranny. If I've missed anything others will chime in.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kenschipper
post Aug 8 2009, 08:41 PM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 186
Joined: 5-May 04
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 2,025
Region Association: Northern California



Are you referring to the standard cooler? I have seen one with the cooler mounted to the grate above the engine as well as ones with the cooler under the rear trunk. Both with thermostatically controlled fans.

The current 6 is a 914-6 engine (not 911) but is not original to this car.



QUOTE(PanelBilly @ Aug 8 2009, 01:33 PM) *

I'm going to run a 3.0 with the small engine mounted cooler, but I don't intend on driving the car that hard. If the 2.0 is original to the body, I say put it away and run the 3.0 Save the 2.0 and get it rebuilt when you have extra $ or save it for the future owner to put back in.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kenschipper
post Aug 8 2009, 08:44 PM
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 186
Joined: 5-May 04
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 2,025
Region Association: Northern California



Are you referring to the standard cooler? I have seen one with the cooler mounted to the grate above the engine as well as ones with the cooler under the rear trunk. Both with thermostatically controlled fans.

The current 6 is a 914-6 engine (not 911) but is not original to this car.



QUOTE(PanelBilly @ Aug 8 2009, 01:33 PM) *

I'm going to run a 3.0 with the small engine mounted cooler, but I don't intend on driving the car that hard. If the 2.0 is original to the body, I say put it away and run the 3.0 Save the 2.0 and get it rebuilt when you have extra $ or save it for the future owner to put back in.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kenschipper
post Aug 8 2009, 08:51 PM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 186
Joined: 5-May 04
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 2,025
Region Association: Northern California



Any thoughts on this particular configuration. Would this work with 3.0 fuel injection our would it be smarter to go weber or PMO to get it to perform right.

I remember reading somewhere what the advantages of a big bore/short stroke engine was but do not remember right now. Any insight on this?

We have a very rare 1979 porsche 911sc engine , built to big bore/ short stroke 3.2 liter, complete rebuild to original specs. Has Std crank that has been magged & polished, new bearings, rebuilt oil pump, new chains, ramps and 930 turbo tensioners , new JE pistons (10.5 to 1 comp) & mahle 97mm nikesil cylinders .. Cams are 964/3.6 grind specs, this engithe pistons do have deep valve pockets, so you can run larger cams. The heads have been rebuilt, ported and polished , 3 angle valve grind, new valve guides, new springs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kenschipper
post Aug 8 2009, 08:51 PM
Post #10


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 186
Joined: 5-May 04
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 2,025
Region Association: Northern California



Any thoughts on this particular configuration (see last paragraph). Would this work with 3.0 fuel injection our would it be smarter to go weber or PMO to get it to perform right.

I remember reading somewhere what the advantages of a big bore/short stroke engine was but do not remember right now. Any insight on this?

We have a very rare 1979 porsche 911sc engine , built to big bore/ short stroke 3.2 liter, complete rebuild to original specs. Has Std crank that has been magged & polished, new bearings, rebuilt oil pump, new chains, ramps and 930 turbo tensioners , new JE pistons (10.5 to 1 comp) & mahle 97mm nikesil cylinders .. Cams are 964/3.6 grind specs, this engithe pistons do have deep valve pockets, so you can run larger cams. The heads have been rebuilt, ported and polished , 3 angle valve grind, new valve guides, new springs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jt914-6
post Aug 8 2009, 11:23 PM
Post #11


Driving & working on teeners 41 years
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,787
Joined: 3-May 08
From: Bryant, Arkansas
Member No.: 9,003
Region Association: South East States



Ken, I've got 40 webers.....I have the standard oil cooler mounted to the engine and an Earl's cooler in front with a thermostat......

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Van914
post Aug 9 2009, 06:54 AM
Post #12


Van914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 702
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Member No.: 90
Region Association: Upper MidWest



On the 3.0 conversion unless you want to cut up the car for the CIS to fit, Go to Webers or PMO's. I have PMO 40mm on mine. Richard makes a intake manifold for the 3.0 Cis motor. Have the distributor recurved by Jerry Woods or Barry at I.A.E. You will not need a front mounted cooler if you are only street driving. Mine has a front mounted cooler and like jt914-6 stays very cool. I too used the PM flywheel kit and it works. Stock trans with stock gearing is what I have found works for me.
Good Luck
Van914
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jt914-6
post Aug 9 2009, 07:10 AM
Post #13


Driving & working on teeners 41 years
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,787
Joined: 3-May 08
From: Bryant, Arkansas
Member No.: 9,003
Region Association: South East States



I knew I left something out. Thanks Van914, yes if using Webers have dizzy recurved.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd July 2025 - 08:15 PM