![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
Kaduku |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 344 Joined: 1-January 13 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 15,324 Region Association: None ![]() |
I am new to 914s and have a chance to purchase my first 914, which is a 1.7. I know the 2.0s are faster and better, but is 1.7 good enough for me????
Please help me decide! |
![]() ![]() |
rmital |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Northeast optimist ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,954 Joined: 12-December 05 From: Park Ridge, NJ Member No.: 5,268 ![]() |
I've had both 1.7 and 2.0
I guess you could say the 2.0 has a little more "pull" off the line (best I could describe), but please if you've found a nice solid 1.7 that's mechanically sound, get it....better than a rusty 2.0! a friend has a '71 1.7, and when I drive it I get the same "yahhoooo" feeling when I hit the gas..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) |
Kaduku |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 344 Joined: 1-January 13 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 15,324 Region Association: None ![]() |
a friend has a '71 1.7, and when I drive it I get the same "yahhoooo" feeling when I hit the gas..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) Okay the "Buy It" meter just moved up one notch. Thanks, and yes it looks structurally and mechanically sound. And it's pretty too |
Kaduku |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 344 Joined: 1-January 13 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 15,324 Region Association: None ![]() |
Don't know if this matters, but it is a 1973 1.7
|
Tom_T |
![]()
Post
#5
|
TMI.... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,321 Joined: 19-March 09 From: Orange, CA Member No.: 10,181 Region Association: Southern California ![]() ![]() |
Don't know if this matters, but it is a 1973 1.7 That one looks like a nice 914, but you'll need a knowledgeable 914 person/mechanic to do a PPI. 1.7L's had 80 HP 70-72 MY's - in 73 it dropped to 76 HP & a very "doggy" 69 HP for CA sold cars! ...vs 95 HP for the 73-74 2L - which you will notice the difference IMHO having driven 70-72 & 73 1.7s & my own 73 2L. Then the 75-76 dropped the 2L to only 86 HP IIRC, so maybe Ray drove a later GC engined 2L, which wasn't much different than a 70-72 1.7 at 80 HP? However, I agree that a nice rust free 1.7 is better than a rusty 2.0. Try driving a few of both & see what YOU like or don't, then make your decision. Also the 73-74 2.0 will be a bit more pricey than a 1.7, so your budget may determine which works for you. .... as you'll see comparing here: http://www.nadaguides.com/Classic-Cars/197...arga-2-0/Values http://www.hagerty.com/valuationtools/HVT/...eport?vc=879762 ^ - back track to select different years & 1.7, 1.8, etc. on these two links Also use this to evaluate all you look at seriously: http://bowlsby.net/914/Classic/zTN_Gen_914CAF.pdf Also read up here & these links to "edumacate" yourself on 914s - http://bowlsby.net/914/Classic/ http://bowlsby.net/914/CanAm/ 914club.com p914.com Good Luck! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) Tom /////// |
JawjaPorsche |
![]()
Post
#6
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,463 Joined: 23-July 11 From: Clayton, Georgia Member No.: 13,351 Region Association: South East States ![]() |
Porsche put the 1.7 in their 70 thru 73 914's. It is a well-tested engine. The 914 is fun car to drive regardless if it has a 1.7 or 2.0.
|
Kaduku |
![]()
Post
#7
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 344 Joined: 1-January 13 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 15,324 Region Association: None ![]() |
QUOTE Try driving a few of both & see what YOU like or don't, then make your decision. Lol, You know I will want a 2.0 if I drive one, which I haven't yet. This is the reason why I want to hear from owners from their experience. In fact, I have only drove one 914 for like 500 yards, don't remember which model, but it could have been a 75 or 76. In other words, I am trying to find justifications to buy this particular car. Thanks for info Tom! |
mepstein |
![]()
Post
#8
|
914-6 GT in waiting ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 19,970 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE Member No.: 10,825 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region ![]() ![]() |
I like my little 1.7. Early cars are lighter. Always go for the least rusty car possible.
|
Kaduku |
![]()
Post
#9
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 344 Joined: 1-January 13 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 15,324 Region Association: None ![]() |
|
JawjaPorsche |
![]()
Post
#10
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,463 Joined: 23-July 11 From: Clayton, Georgia Member No.: 13,351 Region Association: South East States ![]() |
Porsche put the 1.7 in their 70 thru 73 914's. It is a well-tested engine. The 914 is fun car to drive regardless if it has a 1.7 or 2.0. Beautiful 914, looks like the one I am interested in. Thanks everyone, this is really helping me decide. Thank you so much for your kind words about my 914. I am blessed. |
somd914 |
![]()
Post
#11
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,171 Joined: 21-February 11 From: Southern Maryland Member No.: 12,741 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region ![]() |
I like my little 1.7. Early cars are lighter. Always go for the least rusty car possible. And rusty cars are even lighter! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Seriously engine swaps/upgrades are easier and cheaper to deal with than rust. My 73 started as a 1.7, PO swapped to a 2.0, I recently swapped in a 2056 with a mid_RPM cam and daul Webers (hope this doesn't spark the never ending FI/Carb religion battle). My 2056 has quite a bit more right foot response, but still not fast by any stretch of the imagination. I'm glad I swapped, but others are content with a 1.7 or 2.0, and then others go for sixes and V-8's. It all boils down to what you like, but avoid rust... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sawzall-smiley.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif) |
TheCabinetmaker |
![]()
Post
#12
|
I drive my car everyday ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,341 Joined: 8-May 03 From: Tulsa, Ok. Member No.: 666 ![]() |
Like the others have said, HP is the easy part. Rust repair is much harder and could be more costly.
|
cary |
![]()
Post
#13
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,900 Joined: 26-January 04 From: Sherwood Oregon Member No.: 1,608 Region Association: Pacific Northwest ![]() ![]() |
I'm putting a driven hard 1.7 in my restoration project when its finished. Going to paint the tin and clean up the fins and drive it till it gets too tired.
|
brant |
![]()
Post
#14
|
914 Wizard ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12,013 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() ![]() |
never buy a car without pulling the rockers
I would recommend always having a 914 knowledgeable person look it over too... |
Kaduku |
![]()
Post
#15
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 344 Joined: 1-January 13 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 15,324 Region Association: None ![]() |
|
rick 918-S |
![]()
Post
#16
|
Hey nice rack! -Celette ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 21,020 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Now in Superior WI Member No.: 43 Region Association: Northstar Region ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Heeltoe914 |
![]()
Post
#17
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,135 Joined: 31-January 06 From: Tujunga Calif, Member No.: 5,506 ![]() |
I've had both 1.7 and 2.0 I guess you could say the 2.0 has a little more "pull" off the line (best I could describe), but please if you've found a nice solid 1.7 that's mechanically sound, get it....better than a rusty 2.0! a friend has a '71 1.7, and when I drive it I get the same "yahhoooo" feeling when I hit the gas..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) A well tuned four 1.7 is a blast. Do not let that size stop you from buying a car thats clean or fits your needs in every other way. GL |
Spoke |
![]()
Post
#18
|
Jerry ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,193 Joined: 29-October 04 From: Allentown, PA Member No.: 3,031 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
Go for the 2L. I've owned both and the 2L is a lot more fun than the 1.7L
|
JawjaPorsche |
![]()
Post
#19
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,463 Joined: 23-July 11 From: Clayton, Georgia Member No.: 13,351 Region Association: South East States ![]() |
You said it was a 73? That is great because that the first year of Porsche changing to side shift tranny! Much better tranny!
|
Tilly74 |
![]()
Post
#20
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 5-June 12 From: Springfield, MO Member No.: 14,522 Region Association: None ![]() |
My first ride in a 914 was one with a 2.0 bus motor rated at 68 HP or something like that. I thought it was awesome. LOL shows how many rides I've had in a 914. As long as you're not expecting it to accelerate like a modern large displacement sports car, you'll be fine.
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th July 2025 - 04:14 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |