Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Late Vs. early steering shafts, Didn't know there was a difference
Phoenix-MN
post May 17 2013, 10:31 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 927
Joined: 23-January 04
From: ST. Bonifacius,MN
Member No.: 1,590



Ever since I put my steering wheel and shaft in it's had an annoying "over center" notchy feel to it. Well I deceided to fix it and tore it apart today. I had read some threads to swap the shaft end for end to correct the problem but that doesn't index the u-joints any differently. I dug out a shaft from my spare parts to compare and the index slots are about 90 deg. different between the two.

Attached Image

Anyone else run into this before? Is there also a difference in the u-joints?

Paul
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 8)
SirAndy
post May 17 2013, 11:17 AM
Post #2


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,678
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Phoenix-MN @ May 17 2013, 09:31 AM) *
Anyone else run into this before? Is there also a difference in the u-joints?

The geometry is different between early and late cars.

When i installed the '74 steering column in my '70 car i had to re-notch the shaft because everything is aligned differently.
It was a *lot* more work than i had anticipated.

The mounts for the steering column are different early to late and the u-joint on the back of the column is not in the same exact place.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Phoenix-MN
post May 17 2013, 12:08 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 927
Joined: 23-January 04
From: ST. Bonifacius,MN
Member No.: 1,590



Thanks, that makes sense. Mine is a '71 and I had spare parts from a '74, when I put it together I must have used the shaft from the '74 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/mad.gif) Hopefully now when I get it back together all will be well (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

(the early one is the one with the tape on it)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MrHyde
post May 17 2013, 12:51 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 525
Joined: 13-October 10
From: Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 12,268
Region Association: None



Hmmm anybody know when the changeover was ??? I have 73' gear in a 72' body..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jeff Hail
post May 17 2013, 07:44 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,141
Joined: 3-May 07
From: LA/ CA
Member No.: 7,712



1970 to early 71 a different column was used on the 4/4 only for about 10 months. It was a single stalk column manufactured by SWF. Larger shaft at the steering wheel hub. The switch was incorporated in the column housing. It was sold as column assembly even though few individual pieces were shown in the PET separatley, cylinder with keys and turn signal switch assembly. The plug was the 911 style 12 pin (phone plug) not the 14 pin or later 914 wafer style columns with buzzer. It did not have clam shells as the later ones did.

The original PN# was 91461330610 for the earlier column assembly.
It was later changed in the PET to 30510 and now the part number is no longer listed. It was serviced under the switch group where the later columns were serviced with individual parts under the steering parts group.

Late late 71, 1972-73 the column tube housing changed again.
71 the upper shaft is unique
Late late 71, 72-74 the shafts should be the same.
1974 the column tube changed but I believe the shaft is the same through 76.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914Sixer
post May 18 2013, 06:52 AM
Post #6


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,903
Joined: 17-January 05
From: San Angelo Texas
Member No.: 3,457
Region Association: Southwest Region



I read this yesterday and I went out an looked at the shafts I had. They are all the same length but all three are different. If you line them up with one groove at the top all the bottom ones are at a different angle.






User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jeff Hail
post May 18 2013, 09:01 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,141
Joined: 3-May 07
From: LA/ CA
Member No.: 7,712



I have already differentiated the column differences. Let me see if I can break down the upper shaft and intermediate shaft differences.

Upper shafts:
Upper shaft early 70 had larger diameter at steering wheel hub/ spline differences. U-joint was unique to the shaft and serviced as part of the shaft assembly.

Late upper shaft had separate U-joints that are still serviced under 930 Part numbers. Oddly it shows 1 joint required for the 9144 and 2 joints for the 9146.
Will try to keep the 6 cyl parts out of this as its confusing enough.

Intermediate shafts:
9146
Early thru 71
72 on
72 on required 2 of the same U joints.

Column:
72 9146 used the 4 cyl column with the electric wiper switch.


I just figured out why. Early cars had an issue with the upper U joint, they changed the column and upper shaft which slightly altered the angle of attack on the intermediate shaft. This explains the keyway timing differences on the intermediate shafts.

72 on firewall with windscreen frame sheetmetal changed also.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Phoenix-MN
post May 18 2013, 11:09 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 927
Joined: 23-January 04
From: ST. Bonifacius,MN
Member No.: 1,590



Update.... I have put everything back together with the early shaft and it rotates smoothly now with no binding (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jeff Hail
post May 18 2013, 11:21 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,141
Joined: 3-May 07
From: LA/ CA
Member No.: 7,712



QUOTE(Phoenix-MN @ May 18 2013, 10:09 AM) *

Update.... I have put everything back together with the early shaft and it rotates smoothly now with no binding (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif)


Stellar!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 07:58 PM