|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| ThePaintedMan |
Aug 25 2013, 10:30 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,887 Joined: 6-September 11 From: St. Petersburg, FL Member No.: 13,527 Region Association: South East States
|
Hey guys,
Just finishing up the prep on getting my spare motor back in the car. Came across something a little "fishy". So, I swapped over just about everything that was on my 1.7, and this engine is *supposed* to be a 1.8. Everything fits just fine, except for the intake manifolds and gaskets. There are 4 intake manifold studs, but the outer studs are about 3/8 inches further apart than on the 1.8. So much so, that the new 1.7/1.8 phenolic spacers that I have do not fit over the studs. I noticed that the previous owner had cut the spacers in half to make two separate pieces, for each intake port. They still didn't fit quite right though, and part of the spacer protrudes into the intake hole/bore. I'm wondering if these are some kind of other Type 4 head, perhaps from a bus? Pictures to follow in a moment... Attached thumbnail(s) |
![]() ![]() |
| euro911 |
Aug 25 2013, 11:07 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Retired & living the dream. God help me if I wake up! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,937 Joined: 2-December 06 From: So.Cal. & No.AZ (USA) Member No.: 7,300 Region Association: Southern California
|
Can you post the # on the heads? (gotta pull the tins back off) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)
What's the part #s on the intake manifolds? |
| ThePaintedMan |
Aug 25 2013, 12:52 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,887 Joined: 6-September 11 From: St. Petersburg, FL Member No.: 13,527 Region Association: South East States
|
Hey Mark...
Where are the casting numbers on the heads, when I pull them off? These are (I believe) CB Performance manifolds - for a dual carb setup. The manifolds worked fine on my other motor. As did these manifold spacers (from Pelican). |
| Dave_Darling |
Aug 25 2013, 01:27 PM
Post
#4
|
|
914 Idiot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,335 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona Member No.: 121 Region Association: Northern California
|
I think the casting numbers are in the rocker box.
--DD |
| ThePaintedMan |
Aug 25 2013, 01:28 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,887 Joined: 6-September 11 From: St. Petersburg, FL Member No.: 13,527 Region Association: South East States
|
It was under the valve cover, not the engine tin.
022-101-372, which, according to : http://www.tunacan.net/t4/reference/cylhead.htm is a 1.7 head. This engine is supposed to be a 1.8, but that doesn't matter to me. I'm just curious why the dimensions of the studs are different than my 1.7. |
| ThePaintedMan |
Aug 25 2013, 01:34 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,887 Joined: 6-September 11 From: St. Petersburg, FL Member No.: 13,527 Region Association: South East States
|
That site also lists 022-101-372G as a 2.0. I couldn't see a "G" on the casting number for these heads, but I suppose it's a possibility. And the 2.0 bus heads are supposed to be four bolts as well.
Unfortunately that doesn't really help with the dimensions though. |
| euro911 |
Aug 25 2013, 01:39 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Retired & living the dream. God help me if I wake up! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,937 Joined: 2-December 06 From: So.Cal. & No.AZ (USA) Member No.: 7,300 Region Association: Southern California
|
|
| ThePaintedMan |
Aug 25 2013, 01:45 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,887 Joined: 6-September 11 From: St. Petersburg, FL Member No.: 13,527 Region Association: South East States
|
I know, right? Raby would know this one for sure.
I suspect they must be Bus heads. The three types of carb manifolds I have seen from CB Performance and various other manufacturers all have the outer holes elongated that seem to make up for this difference. Unfortunately the phenolic spacers do not. Had I known that they were bus heads, I could have ordered the correct spacers weeks ago. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/headbang.gif) |
| type47 |
Aug 25 2013, 01:47 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Viermeister ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,254 Joined: 7-August 03 From: Vienna, VA Member No.: 994 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
How about the alignment with the holes on the intake manifold? (seems to me that's what matters)
|
| ThePaintedMan |
Aug 25 2013, 01:52 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,887 Joined: 6-September 11 From: St. Petersburg, FL Member No.: 13,527 Region Association: South East States
|
The intake manifolds line up fine, from what I can tell. As I stated, they came pre-drilled, it seems, for both dimensions. I.e. the outer holes in the manifolds are elongated as if they were intended for dual-uses.
|
| ThePaintedMan |
Aug 26 2013, 11:46 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,887 Joined: 6-September 11 From: St. Petersburg, FL Member No.: 13,527 Region Association: South East States
|
Well, I ended up installing them as-is with a gasket on both sides of the spacer. I'd still like to know what the difference is here and why the dimensions on these heads are what they are, but for now, hopefully it'll do.
|
| euro911 |
Aug 26 2013, 12:19 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Retired & living the dream. God help me if I wake up! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,937 Joined: 2-December 06 From: So.Cal. & No.AZ (USA) Member No.: 7,300 Region Association: Southern California
|
Well, I ended up installing them as-is with a gasket on both sides of the spacer. I'd still like to know what the difference is here and why the dimensions on these heads are what they are, but for now, hopefully it'll do. Krusty should be able to answer the question ...PM him if he doesn't pop in on this thread (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) |
| JamesM |
Aug 26 2013, 12:57 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,187 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Kearns, UT Member No.: 5,834 Region Association: Intermountain Region |
The intake manifolds line up fine, from what I can tell. As I stated, they came pre-drilled, it seems, for both dimensions. I.e. the outer holes in the manifolds are elongated as if they were intended for dual-uses. I thought the outer hole elongation on the manifolds was to cover the difference between the outer bolts to work with both the 4 bolt and 3 bolt setups. I had no idea there were 2 different spacing of 4 bolt heads? |
| skeates |
Aug 26 2013, 01:10 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 219 Joined: 28-February 05 From: Sacramento, ca Member No.: 3,684 Region Association: Northern California |
Was the mis-match the same on both heads? Could be that one of the studs pulled and the PO installed a crooked helicoil?
|
| Cap'n Krusty |
Aug 26 2013, 01:21 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Cap'n Krusty ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,794 Joined: 24-June 04 From: Santa Maria, CA Member No.: 2,246 Region Association: Central California |
I have seen ONLY one 4 bolt intake manifold bolt pattern and one 3 bolt intake manifold bolt pattern on T4 heads, be they T2, T4, or 914. Lotsa heads over 40 years, no variations on the 4 bolt pattern. The Spanish heads, all for 2 liter bus, are the same, too.
The Cap'n |
| euro911 |
Aug 26 2013, 01:31 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Retired & living the dream. God help me if I wake up! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,937 Joined: 2-December 06 From: So.Cal. & No.AZ (USA) Member No.: 7,300 Region Association: Southern California
|
Was the mis-match the same on both heads? Could be that one of the studs pulled and the PO installed a crooked helicoil? I was thinking similar when I saw the pix George posted, ("The tins fit normal - what would be the difference?")George, did you snap any pix of the intake ports without the gaskets? Is there any evidence that the original studs may have been relocated (possibly to fit some oddball intake manifold somebody kludged together)? |
| euro911 |
Aug 26 2013, 01:33 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Retired & living the dream. God help me if I wake up! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,937 Joined: 2-December 06 From: So.Cal. & No.AZ (USA) Member No.: 7,300 Region Association: Southern California
|
I have seen ONLY one 4 bolt intake manifold bolt pattern and one 3 bolt intake manifold bolt pattern on T4 heads, be they T2, T4, or 914. Lotsa heads over 40 years, no variations on the 4 bolt pattern. The Spanish heads, all for 2 liter bus, are the same, too. I've seen different exhaust ports, but not intakes.The Cap'n |
| Cap'n Krusty |
Aug 26 2013, 01:55 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Cap'n Krusty ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,794 Joined: 24-June 04 From: Santa Maria, CA Member No.: 2,246 Region Association: Central California |
Yup. "Race track" looking exhaust ports and "square" ports (78 and up T2s and Vanagons).
The Cap'n |
| ThePaintedMan |
Aug 26 2013, 02:04 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,887 Joined: 6-September 11 From: St. Petersburg, FL Member No.: 13,527 Region Association: South East States
|
Yeah I knew about the square exhaust ports on the Vanagon heads, but not the intakes.
Both heads were the same (had the exact same dimension). I did see some welding on the backside of the intake stud (i.e. down in the fins area), but nothing blatantly obvious suggesting that it had been helicoiled before. Of course I was in too much of a rush to snap more pics. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/headbang.gif) The intakes that came on the engine are a little odd. They're very short and used bolts instead of studs, so I guess it is possible the PO decided it would be easier to fill in the original stud holes, then re-drill it for these manifolds? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) They definitely weren't helicoiled though. I got the engine from billh1963 off of that purty pink car with the flares he had sitting in his driveway. I don't think he knew much else about the history of the car, other than the engine had been rebuilt at some point. |
| r_towle |
Aug 26 2013, 08:11 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Custom Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 24,705 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Taxachusetts Member No.: 124 Region Association: North East States
|
Could be the 2.0 liter heads that someone removed the middle stud and added two studs to match the manifolds.
I believe the outer studs on a 2.0 liter are wider in spacing than either the 1.7 or 1.8 heads. Rich |
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd April 2026 - 04:08 PM |
| All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
|
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |