![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
Mikey914 |
![]()
Post
#1
|
The rubber man ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12,679 Joined: 27-December 04 From: Hillsboro, OR Member No.: 3,348 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.
The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul. If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine. -Mark |
![]() ![]() |
seanpaulmc |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 305 Joined: 6-December 16 From: Orlando, FL Member No.: 20,649 Region Association: South East States ![]() ![]() |
I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7. The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul. If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine. -Mark Bump |
markhoward |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 379 Joined: 5-March 17 From: Lafayette, CA Member No.: 20,897 Region Association: Northern California ![]() ![]() |
count me in
|
914_teener |
![]()
Post
#4
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,205 Joined: 31-August 08 From: So. Cal Member No.: 9,489 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
I'm in Mark....for the next motor.
Need two inner door seals as well for my passenger side. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/icon_bump.gif) |
walterolin |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 685 Joined: 30-November 11 From: Louisville, Ky Member No.: 13,838 Region Association: South East States ![]() |
More crack - I'm in for one.
|
914Next |
![]()
Post
#6
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 699 Joined: 28-July 14 From: Ephraim Wisconsin Member No.: 17,695 Region Association: Upper MidWest ![]() ![]() |
I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7. The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul. If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine. -Mark Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks. |
Olympic 914 |
![]()
Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,680 Joined: 7-July 11 From: Pittsburgh PA Member No.: 13,287 Region Association: North East States ![]() ![]() |
What is the cold Ohm resistance ?
|
Mikey914 |
![]()
Post
#8
|
The rubber man ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12,679 Joined: 27-December 04 From: Hillsboro, OR Member No.: 3,348 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
|
draganc |
![]()
Post
#9
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 725 Joined: 2-November 09 From: central new jersey Member No.: 11,000 Region Association: North East States ![]() |
Mark,
Count me in for one. Thanks, dc |
Porschef |
![]()
Post
#10
|
How you doin' ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,168 Joined: 7-September 10 From: LawnGuyland Member No.: 12,152 Region Association: North East States ![]() ![]() |
I'll give one a whirl
|
Freezin 914 |
![]()
Post
#11
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 880 Joined: 27-July 14 From: Wisconsin Member No.: 17,687 Region Association: Upper MidWest ![]() ![]() |
I will take one, (IMG:style_emoticons/default/icon_bump.gif)
|
Olympic 914 |
![]()
Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,680 Joined: 7-July 11 From: Pittsburgh PA Member No.: 13,287 Region Association: North East States ![]() ![]() |
|
whitetwinturbo |
![]()
Post
#13
|
Honey, does this wing make my ass look fat? ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,391 Joined: 22-October 11 From: Newport Beach/Kalefornya/USA Member No.: 13,704 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
|
Mikey914 |
![]()
Post
#14
|
The rubber man ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12,679 Joined: 27-December 04 From: Hillsboro, OR Member No.: 3,348 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7. The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul. If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine. -Mark Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks. The only difference is that some have a ballast in line with it. If you have one and all your components are in the factory configuration, otherwise do not add one. |
Mikey914 |
![]()
Post
#15
|
The rubber man ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12,679 Joined: 27-December 04 From: Hillsboro, OR Member No.: 3,348 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
I will be sending out codes here late today. I also have 3 other GBs running so you can combine.
They are - - The CHT for D jet PN 0280130012 -shift bushings GB -GB for Mirror - Late -GB for the positive terminal block that will be launching tonight and I'm working on a complete cable option. Thanks all! |
turk22 |
![]()
Post
#16
|
Treetop Flyer ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 735 Joined: 27-July 12 From: Cincinnati OH Member No.: 14,725 Region Association: Upper MidWest ![]() |
I will take one as well
|
Mikey914 |
![]()
Post
#17
|
The rubber man ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12,679 Joined: 27-December 04 From: Hillsboro, OR Member No.: 3,348 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
PMs sent to all so far
Closing this sunday. |
JamesM |
![]()
Post
#18
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,922 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Kearns, UT Member No.: 5,834 Region Association: Intermountain Region ![]() |
I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7. The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul. If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine. -Mark Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks. The only difference is that some have a ballast in line with it. If you have one and all your components are in the factory configuration, otherwise do not add one. Double check that. If my memory serves me the "proper" sensor for a 73 2.0 setup had a resistance curve that was quite a bit different off by something like >1k ohms when cold. 73 was an odd duck setup as it used a unique CHT and MPS to get the 2.0 to run correctly on the 72 1.7 ECU. 74 the 2.0 got a unique ECU and went back to using sensors with curves closer to the 1.7s. Ill see if I can dig up the data, if not I have both a 73 and 74 setup I can compare. |
JamesM |
![]()
Post
#19
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,922 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Kearns, UT Member No.: 5,834 Region Association: Intermountain Region ![]() |
Looks like Brand Anders has some of the data on his site.
https://members.rennlist.com/pbanders/DJetParts.htm At operating temp they are similar but the warm-up curve is significantly different. Long time ago I had a 73 with a miss matched CHT sensor, ran like absolute garbage until it came up to temp. It will run, warmup is trash though. That was actually the motor i did my first Megasquirt build on because even 15 years ago it was near impossible to find the 017 sensor a 73 2.0 needs. If you want to save guys running 73 2.0s a lot of headaches make a run of these with a thermistor that has the same curve as the 0 280 130 017 sensor. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 04:58 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |