Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> another fuel line question-, would this work, why or why not?
ottox914
post Nov 28 2005, 07:29 PM
Post #1


The glory that once was.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Mahtomedi, MN
Member No.: 1,438
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I was using NAPA fuel injection hose to replace some lines to the fuel injectors. Ran out. NAPA was out also. Went to another shop for more hose. They sold me some "multi use" hose, said it was good to 300 psi, could be used for fuel, hydrolic (SP?), or other liquids, and BONUS, it was less than 1/2 the cost of the "real" FI hose from NAPA. Have had no issues with it so far.

So, can I use this hose from the tank to the motor? Why or why not? It'd be flexable, to snake thru the tunnel if you wanted to go that way... or thru the long... (my car has headers and no heat thru the long), or route it along side the long like oil cooler lines... or inside the car next to the tunnel and put a metal cover over it?

Waddya all think?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 4)
r_towle
post Nov 28 2005, 08:59 PM
Post #2


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,594
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



I read a great tip here...

Run a small electrical wire....16 or 18 guage up through the old plastic line from front to back BEFORE you pull it out...

Then pull out the plastic line, but leave the wire behind...

Then, when you put the new line in, put it over the electric line and it will guide the new line up through the tunnel.

I vote for running it in the tunnel...

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
736conver
post Nov 28 2005, 09:26 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 25-May 03
From: SE Wisconsin
Member No.: 736
Region Association: None



Why not just metal lines through or next to the tunnel. Cost cant be much different from the rubber if not cheaper.
And not like it would happen but what if it sprung a leak inside the long. Why take any chances. Something that is as cheap as this I say do in metal.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SLITS
post Nov 28 2005, 09:38 PM
Post #4


"This Utah shit is HARSH!"
**********

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 13,602
Joined: 22-February 04
From: SoCal Mountains ...
Member No.: 1,696
Region Association: None



Reasons for running braided or metal lines is chafing from vibration. If you are willing to inspect the rubber lines through the tunnel / longs as often as you check the lines in the engine compartment....ain't no problem.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sean_v8_914
post Nov 28 2005, 10:40 PM
Post #5


Chingon 601
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,011
Joined: 1-February 05
From: San Diego
Member No.: 3,541



I just ran steel lines through the tunnel to replace the hard plastic. I paid $3.58 at NAPA for each (5/16th & 7/16ths) 6 foot pc. This is a much cheaper and better way to go. Rubber hose would be easier to snake through the tunnel. I also bought a brake line bender for $4.39
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 11:47 AM