Lesser of two evils?, Dual34ICTs or Weber progressive ? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Lesser of two evils?, Dual34ICTs or Weber progressive ? |
Brotherbob |
Dec 21 2005, 07:49 PM
Post
#1
|
Lazy Hack Group: Members Posts: 152 Joined: 6-September 05 From: Granbury TX Member No.: 4,756 |
I have a 1.8 carb engine that I want to hear run soon, maybe over the holi-daze.
What would you use ? The 34 ICTS seem to be a tidy set up that would allow some much needed room under the hood. But.....I hear they are a pain the ass to tune - I feel froggy. The Weber really has a bad name but there sure are a bunch of them out there and ease of tuning, parts, etc. Wadda think? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/screwy.gif) |
davep |
Dec 21 2005, 07:51 PM
Post
#2
|
914 Historian Group: Benefactors Posts: 5,154 Joined: 13-October 03 From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0 Member No.: 1,244 Region Association: Canada |
Does either one pass the "float test"?
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/popcorn[1].gif) |
Brotherbob |
Dec 21 2005, 08:02 PM
Post
#3
|
Lazy Hack Group: Members Posts: 152 Joined: 6-September 05 From: Granbury TX Member No.: 4,756 |
Float test ? Throw em in the lake and see if they float ?
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif) |
davep |
Dec 21 2005, 08:08 PM
Post
#4
|
914 Historian Group: Benefactors Posts: 5,154 Joined: 13-October 03 From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0 Member No.: 1,244 Region Association: Canada |
Yeah. Thats the one. Certainly is a question of two evils. Best of luck. I'm sticking with original FI for a while yet, then I'll look at at other FI options.
|
JoeSharp |
Dec 21 2005, 08:13 PM
Post
#5
|
In Irvine, Ca. May 15-18 Group: Members Posts: 3,947 Joined: 9-July 03 From: DeLand, Florida Member No.: 898 Region Association: South East States |
I've been pulling the injection systems and installing carbs (notice the s). The lesser of your 2 evils is twins.
:PERMAGRIN: Joe |
Dave_Darling |
Dec 21 2005, 08:16 PM
Post
#6
|
914 Idiot Group: Members Posts: 14,991 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona Member No.: 121 Region Association: Northern California |
Yup--anything at all is better than the single-carb setup. Unless you go to a lot of trouble to heat up the manifolds. Then maybe--maybe--it can work OK.
--DD |
Brotherbob |
Dec 21 2005, 10:33 PM
Post
#7
|
Lazy Hack Group: Members Posts: 152 Joined: 6-September 05 From: Granbury TX Member No.: 4,756 |
So the twins it is.
I really want this as a back up plan for FI but I am lacking a few pcs. I have no idea if the FI ECM is good and the injectors look like hell. So the big problem with single carbs is the " heating of the manifold" ? Maybe like the old type 1 engines that frosted the intake with ice? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/chatsmiley.gif) |
LvSteveH |
Dec 21 2005, 10:38 PM
Post
#8
|
I put the Poor in Porsche Group: Members Posts: 1,080 Joined: 22-April 03 From: Las Vegas, Nevada Member No.: 600 |
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/cool_shades.gif) You could always go twin progressives
|
Jake Raby |
Dec 21 2005, 10:56 PM
Post
#9
|
Engine Surgeon Group: Members Posts: 9,394 Joined: 31-August 03 From: Lost Member No.: 1,095 Region Association: South East States |
Anything is better than the piece of shit progressive.... The ICT isn't a bad carb at all, the only thing that sucks about them is having to remove the top of the carb to make a jet change...
|
dlo914 |
Dec 21 2005, 10:57 PM
Post
#10
|
||
Whatchu' lookin' at?!?! Group: Members Posts: 3,432 Joined: 6-September 04 From: San Gabriel, CA Member No.: 2,697 |
ive got a 1.7L ECU and harness i have no use for...i'll let it go for $50. |
||
Trekkor |
Dec 21 2005, 11:21 PM
Post
#11
|
I do things... Group: Members Posts: 7,809 Joined: 2-December 03 From: Napa, Ca Member No.: 1,413 Region Association: Northern California |
I've seen what the FOUR guys can do with carbs.
Steve N., Nathan, Albert, Sir Andy... If I was running a FOUR again, Webers would be on board. KT |
eg914 |
Dec 22 2005, 12:33 AM
Post
#12
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 319 Joined: 17-June 04 From: Elk Grove, CA Member No.: 2,223 Region Association: None |
I ran 34ICTs on a type III for years. Easy to tune, ran great, warmed up quickly. I have the progressive on my 914. Absolutely horrible. RUN AWAY! RUN AWAY!
Anything would be better than the single progressive on a flat 4. |
bd1308 |
Dec 22 2005, 12:37 AM
Post
#13
|
Sir Post-a-lot Group: Members Posts: 8,020 Joined: 24-January 05 From: Louisville,KY Member No.: 3,501 |
everytime someone puts a progressive carb on a 914, a kitten dies....
please think of the kittens..... b Attached image(s) |
Bleyseng |
Dec 22 2005, 07:54 AM
Post
#14
|
||
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,035 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
Only witha cam change, otherwise its a waste of time (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/mad.gif) |
||
davep |
Dec 22 2005, 08:18 AM
Post
#15
|
||
914 Historian Group: Benefactors Posts: 5,154 Joined: 13-October 03 From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0 Member No.: 1,244 Region Association: Canada |
Sure, but just look what can be done with modern FI. I've driven a car with two dual Webers, and it was nowhere as good as the original FI. I'm not saying it cannot be done because it certainly has been. However it takes a much greater skill, and lots of parts, to do so correctly. |
||
URY914 |
Dec 22 2005, 08:30 AM
Post
#16
|
I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind. Group: Members Posts: 121,070 Joined: 3-February 03 From: Jacksonville, FL Member No.: 222 Region Association: None |
I've got a Progressive that I would be happy to send to you.
|
Brotherbob |
Dec 22 2005, 09:24 AM
Post
#17
|
Lazy Hack Group: Members Posts: 152 Joined: 6-September 05 From: Granbury TX Member No.: 4,756 |
Well I guess we could make up a progressive dual set up !
Twice as much to complain about. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/sawzall-smiley.gif) |
LvSteveH |
Dec 22 2005, 12:30 PM
Post
#18
|
I put the Poor in Porsche Group: Members Posts: 1,080 Joined: 22-April 03 From: Las Vegas, Nevada Member No.: 600 |
I agree with the suggestion to go with the ICT's, but having "dual" progressives actually solves most of the problems they are known for on 914's. I've got electric chokes, and for the most part you wouldn't have any idea you were running carbs. The only issues I've had were going to higher elevation in Moab for the Red Rock Classic. I've got my idle rpm set pretty low in vegas, but up there, the fat mixture had me down to 400 rpms or so. When I got back down here, the idle jumped back up, and I haven't touched it since. I'm guessing very few kits were made to put dual progressives in a 914.
|
IronHillRestorations |
Dec 22 2005, 12:31 PM
Post
#19
|
I. I. R. C. Group: Members Posts: 6,731 Joined: 18-March 03 From: West TN Member No.: 439 Region Association: None |
I'm voting for the dual ICTs. Not optimum, but better than the progressive.
I've only seen/drove one car that ran decent with the single progressive carb set up. It had small intake runners though, which would help with the world famous low end gasp the single is known for, and the guy did a lot of tinkering with the jetting to get it optimized. Or at least as optimized as you can get with a set up that's ill suited for the application. If you don't mind having the engine totally fall on it's face when you punch it from idle; or if you don't mind the engine never really running well in cool weather; then the single is for you (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/laugh.gif) They could be considered fool proof though. If it isn't a piece of corroded crap, the car will run, not the best but it will run. Don't be intimidated by syncronizing dual carbs. It's not black magic. The problem lots of guys run into with carbs is having the wrong carbs (usually too big) or the wrong venturi and jet package for the displacement and cam (again usually too big). If you have the wrong size carbs and/or the wrong venturi and jet package, you may as well have a single progressive. The european 1.8's had dual Solex carbs(IIRC), which are similar to the ICTs. I'd like to see the air cleaner set up for those first hand. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th June 2024 - 05:22 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |