Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> New (to me) 2.0 engine
srb7f
post Feb 15 2006, 07:47 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 157
Joined: 17-May 04
From: Roswell, GA
Member No.: 2,077
Region Association: None



I just purchased a 75' 2.0 engine to replace my tired 1.8 that's got about 95,000 miles on it. According to the seller, the compression ratios are 125, 130, 130, 125 in order. Uncertain on mileage, but I'm trying to decide what I want to do with the engine.
One option is cleaning it up, putting it in with the SSIs and bursch muffler for my 1.8.

I don't really want to get into expensive head work or engine rebuilds right now, but is there anything simple (like putting in new rings) and fairly inexpensive which will increase the compression and increase the power before I put the engine in?

I don't have too much experience with engine work, but as I rebuilt everything else on the 914, I'm sure I could learn. As far as my use for the engine, I basically drive the car aggressively on the street during nice days, but I do like to get to an autocross or two per year if time allows. Any input is greatly appreciated from someone with more experience with engines. Steve
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 7)
Allan
post Feb 15 2006, 07:49 PM
Post #2


Teenerless Weenie
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,373
Joined: 5-July 04
From: Western Mesopotamia
Member No.: 2,304
Region Association: Southern California



If it has good compression and turns freely why not just put it in, run it and see what you have.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post Feb 15 2006, 07:55 PM
Post #3


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,083
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Slap it in the car and drive it! (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/driving.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
yarin
post Feb 15 2006, 08:08 PM
Post #4


'14-X'in FOOL
***

Group: Members
Posts: 988
Joined: 13-May 03
From: Guttenberg, NJ
Member No.: 693
Region Association: North East States



It's so easy to install and drop a motor in these cars i'd say just slap it in and GO.

Compression sounds good. Any idea what leakdown is? You will notice a nice power difference between a 1.8 and good 2.0.

Sky is the limit as far as engine work goes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
type47
post Feb 15 2006, 09:16 PM
Post #5


Viermeister
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,254
Joined: 7-August 03
From: Vienna, VA
Member No.: 994
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE (Headrage @ Feb 15 2006, 05:49 PM)
If it has good compression and turns freely why not just put it in, run it and see what you have.

how complete? complete with induction system?

what they said. heck, you could L-jet it if you don't have the induction... just ask bd1308 (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
srb7f
post Feb 15 2006, 09:50 PM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 157
Joined: 17-May 04
From: Roswell, GA
Member No.: 2,077
Region Association: None



Induction system included. It's everything from intake to exhaust, with transmission included. Stock D-jet from 75, but I will be using my SSI from my 1.8 since they won't rust and will be less restrictive than the later style exhaust. Sounds like the thing to do is drop it in and go. I am pretty excited about the power difference.

Aren't the compression readings kinda low? The range was from like 120-156 in the haynes manual. I did notice that there was a minimum of 93, which is quite far away from the 125-130 of this motor.

It is my understanding that the reason the 75-76 2.0s were not as powerful as the 73-74s was the more restrictive exhaust. Is there anything else in the intake system that was better with the old style? Thanks for the suggestions.
Steve
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Allan
post Feb 15 2006, 09:55 PM
Post #7


Teenerless Weenie
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,373
Joined: 5-July 04
From: Western Mesopotamia
Member No.: 2,304
Region Association: Southern California



If those compression numbers are accurate they're not that bad. You want to look at consistancy.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EdwardBlume
post Feb 15 2006, 10:03 PM
Post #8


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,338
Joined: 2-January 03
From: SLO
Member No.: 81
Region Association: Central California



Definitely put it in and run it. If you keep the FI and need to replace any of the parts, it could ring up in a hurry. Run it for awhile and enjoy!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th June 2024 - 03:08 AM