Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> So whose using a rising-rate fuel pump regulator?, Not turbos; or using a cold start valve as a 5th injector?
computers4kids
post Jan 22 2007, 07:42 PM
Post #1


Love these little cars!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,443
Joined: 11-June 05
From: Port Townsend, WA
Member No.: 4,253
Region Association: None



Who has played with a rising-rate regulator or adding a switch to a cold start valve to be used as a 5th injector to get a little extra pony power?
Here's one...
MicroDynamics RisingRate Regulators are designed for use with all types of fuel injection systems. Added to standard systems they increase the mixture range for high performance or provide "boost or load enrichment" on both turbo and naturally aspirated engines. Rising-Rate will also give more fuel at the top end without going over-rich lower down the rev/power range.

A MicroDynamics RisingRate Regulator is often the only form of fuel enrichment required for many retrofit turbo conversions and is usually the easiest way to obtain increased fuelling on production injected race vehicles.

Here's one by Bell Engineering $179

Here is an interesting article how to make your own rising-rate pressure regulator from a stock 914 regulator



Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 13)
pbanders
post Jan 22 2007, 08:11 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 939
Joined: 11-June 03
From: Phoenix, AZ
Member No.: 805



QUOTE(computers4kids @ Jan 22 2007, 06:42 PM) *

Here is an interesting article how to make your own rising-rate pressure regulator from a stock 914 regulator


Funny, I was just thinking about this today. Wonder if you could use the ported adjuster from a decel valve to do the same thing instead of the mod described? The decel valve and the FPR are very similar in construction.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Jan 22 2007, 08:26 PM
Post #3


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



I have popping issues while under boost and cold on my Type I motor.....hmm, this looks interesting.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
banger
post Jan 22 2007, 09:07 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 354
Joined: 12-November 06
From: Santa Clarita
Member No.: 7,205
Region Association: Southern California



Didnt the 1.8s have a manifold referenced fuel pressure regulator? Most modern cars have a manifold referenced regulator. It is a bit amazing that the d-jet cars didnt have one. Since the d-jet cars didnt have one, adding one would probably make it run worse, since they have already compensated for the differences in flow between open and closed throttle.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Twystd1
post Jan 22 2007, 09:22 PM
Post #5


You don't want to know... really.....
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,514
Joined: 12-September 04
From: Newport Beach, California
Member No.: 2,743



Z,

Are you running cards or FI?

Cause if you are running a carb (or carbs)

Unless you have a blow through setup.

I don't see how a rising rate fuel regulator will help you.

I can see a 5th injector helping you... if you need one.

Conversely, if you have a draw through carb. A rising rate won't really help you. As the carb never see the boost signal.

And have you dyno'd that engine yet????

I have some more mindless questions coming later.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/drooley.gif)

C
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
computers4kids
post Jan 22 2007, 10:02 PM
Post #6


Love these little cars!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,443
Joined: 11-June 05
From: Port Townsend, WA
Member No.: 4,253
Region Association: None



QUOTE(banger @ Jan 22 2007, 07:07 PM) *

Didnt the 1.8s have a manifold referenced fuel pressure regulator? Most modern cars have a manifold referenced regulator. It is a bit amazing that the d-jet cars didnt have one. Since the d-jet cars didnt have one, adding one would probably make it run worse, since they have already compensated for the differences in flow between open and closed throttle.



QUOTE(Twystd1 @ Jan 22 2007, 07:22 PM) *

Z,

Are you running cards or FI? djet & an extra Ljet laying around...which really sounds interesting.

Cause if you are running a carb (or carbs)

Unless you have a blow through setup.

I don't see how a rising rate fuel regulator will help you. Setting the regulator to start increasing fuel pressure in the higher rpms should result in more fuel being pushed through the injectors. Lower rpms, fuel stays closer to stock pressure, 29. ECU can be left alone--idle mixture OK. MPS perhaps?

I can see a 5th injector helping you... if you need one.

Conversely, if you have a draw through carb. A rising rate won't really help you. As the carb never see the boost signal.

And have you dyno'd that engine yet???? Unfortuately not...would be interesting to play with this idea on a dyno.
I have some more mindless questions coming later.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/drooley.gif)

C

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Jan 22 2007, 10:06 PM
Post #7


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



Dual throttle bodies.....we got 160hp with 5lbs of boost.

I put a heavier (10lbs) spring in but I am either losing pressure thru the BOV or the seals on top of the throttle bodies.

We did the dyno, the exhaust got white hot....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Twystd1
post Jan 22 2007, 10:21 PM
Post #8


You don't want to know... really.....
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,514
Joined: 12-September 04
From: Newport Beach, California
Member No.: 2,743



What were the EGTs when the exhaust was white hot????


C
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Jan 22 2007, 10:27 PM
Post #9


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



1450F
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Jan 23 2007, 12:15 AM
Post #10


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,991
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(computers4kids @ Jan 22 2007, 05:42 PM) *

Who has played with a rising-rate regulator or adding a switch to a cold start valve to be used as a 5th injector to get a little extra pony power?


Well, that would be awfully nice if you could get more air into the engine to go with that fuel. Otherwise, you're just richening up the mixture, most likely to the point where you get worse power and beyond that.

The only people I know of who did the RRFPR thing and seemed to have it work OK were running boost. Jeff Shyu (Jenny's brother) did that on his D-jet turbo 914. (Yeah, I know--you can't turbo a 914!) Otherwise, it's just a way to richen the mixture with higher throttle settings in a way that is diffcult to reconcile with the way the stock D-jet is working.

The L-jet FPR used on the 1.8 is supposed to keep the fuel pressure at a constant difference from the manifold air pressure, so you get a consistent amount of fuel going in for a given injector opening time. It's one way to remove one of the variables that occurs within the intake system, and probably the most useful when you are designing and/or programming the EFI system.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Twystd1
post Jan 23 2007, 12:32 AM
Post #11


You don't want to know... really.....
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,514
Joined: 12-September 04
From: Newport Beach, California
Member No.: 2,743



QUOTE(mikez @ Jan 22 2007, 08:27 PM) *

1450F



Uhhhhh.... No wonder the headers were white....

I B surprised the engine didn't take a shit on you.

Is this the MS brained engine?

Even better... Do you have pics and a build sheet for induction, spark, turbo, brain, complete fuel system setup, etc....

Cause that thang needs a fixin...................

This way we can hijack the entire thread... Just like the good old days......

C
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Jan 23 2007, 12:33 AM
Post #12


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,541
Joined: 1-February 03
From: OC
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



ive heard good things....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Twystd1
post Jan 24 2007, 10:01 AM
Post #13


You don't want to know... really.....
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,514
Joined: 12-September 04
From: Newport Beach, California
Member No.: 2,743



QUOTE(Aaron Cox @ Jan 22 2007, 10:33 PM) *

ive heard good things....



What things have you heard AA?

C'mon... people want to know...

Are the voices getting clearer???

Do you know where they are coming from.....????????????
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ischmitz
post Jan 27 2007, 04:58 AM
Post #14


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 24-June 06
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Member No.: 6,295



QUOTE(Twystd1 @ Jan 22 2007, 11:32 PM) *



Uhhhhh.... No wonder the headers were white....

I B surprised the engine didn't take a shit on you.

Is this the MS brained engine?

Even better... Do you have pics and a build sheet for induction, spark, turbo, brain, complete fuel system setup, etc....

Cause that thang needs a fixin...................

This way we can hijack the entire thread... Just like the good old days......

C



Yep - that's the one. It does run MS-II with an LS-1 wideband O2 sensor. It has a raising rate fuel pressure regulator sensing manifold pressure. However, I think we are running too lean under boost. I need to get the laptop hooked up again to read the wideband data while under boost...

Last time we had to sort out timing since we got some pinging under boost. The MS-II software is sort of buggy. Often doesn't remember changes to the 12x12 tables and reverts back to an older setting. This makes tuning cumbersome but it needs more work....


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 12:09 AM