Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Heat exchanger question
1bad914
post Jan 28 2007, 10:41 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 618
Joined: 6-May 04
From: Battle Creek, MI
Member No.: 2,028



I have built a 1911, I have the option of putting early 1.7 heat exchangers on or putting later two piece exchangers on, what is the opinion, I have always had problems with exhaust leaks with the one piece system, I was thinking that the two piece system may be better since the j-pipe would install very easily. ???
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 8)
Mueller
post Jan 28 2007, 10:47 AM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE(1bad914 @ Jan 28 2007, 08:41 AM) *

I have built a 1911, I have the option of putting early 1.7 heat exchangers on or putting later two piece exchangers on, what is the opinion, I have always had problems with exhaust leaks with the one piece system, I was thinking that the two piece system may be better since the j-pipe would install very easily. ???



if you mean the heat exchangers from a '75/'76 1.8 or 2.0, expect a loss of 4-8 hp and a increase in head temperatures.....

trust me, the single piece is a PITA as well....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brando
post Jan 28 2007, 02:03 PM
Post #3


BUY MY SPARE KIDNEY!!!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,935
Joined: 29-August 04
From: Santa Ana, CA
Member No.: 2,648
Region Association: Southern California



Scrounge the classifieds for a set of SSI 2.0 heat exchangers and heat hardware. They have a larger inside diameter than stock early 2.0 heat exchangers and should give you a wee bit of hp over those 4-2-1 late style heat exchangers.

Believe me, the backdate is worth it. You just gotta find all those little pieces.

Or if you don't care for heat, a guy named ed (willowcreeklane) has what looks like a euro race header available in anaheim hills, ca.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Jan 28 2007, 02:22 PM
Post #4


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



Go with 73-74 HEs with the appropriate hanger and muffler.....only thing better is a header...but no heat.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
1bad914
post Jan 28 2007, 02:25 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 618
Joined: 6-May 04
From: Battle Creek, MI
Member No.: 2,028



I just sold a full SSI HE setup last year, This wil be a daily driver, I have access to multiple early 1.7 HE's, since my wife and I will be using this car as a weekend beach cruiser also(yes we have beaches in Michigan) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I would like heat, so the one piece 1.7 HE with heat hardware will do the trick.

Thanks!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ottox914
post Jan 29 2007, 07:47 AM
Post #6


The glory that once was.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Mahtomedi, MN
Member No.: 1,438
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Go to the for sale section and buy my SSI package, everything you need but the gaskets and a few bolts. PM me of you want. I'm in NW wisconsin, hopefully shipping wouldn't be to bad, or if you come down to the Mpls/st paul area for work or play, we could meet and do the deal.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jan 29 2007, 09:36 AM
Post #7


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,585
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



The stock 1.7 and 2.0 liter 72-74 all have the same size inner diameter of the tube,so the difference is the upturned end on the 1.7 setup, the flange on the end is different as well as the gasket/muffler connection.

They do require different muffler hangers, and different mufflers, and gaskets.

The front side, head side/heat side is basically the same.

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Jan 29 2007, 11:11 AM
Post #8


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,035
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Hmm, why the different size gaskets at the HE to muffler? I measured the stockers years ago IIRC inside diameter is bigger on the 2.0L HE.

Now on the SSI HE's the pipe is the same dimension inside with only the upturn at the end being the difference.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jan 29 2007, 11:16 AM
Post #9


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,585
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



The inside diameter of the 1.7/1.8 versus the early 2.0 liter are the same. I have both on the floor.

the gasket is different cause the tubes are closer together on the 2.0 liter, and the flange is a different shape. They are close, but no cigar.

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 12:00 AM